[3D printing in spinal surgery-Update].
3D-Druck in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie – Update.
Anatomic models
Education
Patient-specific modeling
Precision medicine
Surgery, computer-assisted
Journal
Der Unfallchirurg
ISSN: 1433-044X
Titre abrégé: Unfallchirurg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8502736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
accepted:
19
01
2022
pubmed:
18
2
2022
medline:
12
5
2022
entrez:
17
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The technique of 3D printing offers a high potential for further optimization of spinal surgery. This new technology has been published for different areas in the field of spinal surgery, e.g. in preoperative planning, intraoperative use as well as to create patient-specific implants. For example, it has been demonstrated that preoperative 3‑dimensional visualization of spinal deformities is helpful in planning procedures. Moreover, insertion of pedicle screws seems to be more accurate when using individualized templates to guide the drill compared to freehand techniques. This review summarizes the current literature dealing with 3D printing in spinal surgery with special consideration of the current applications, the limitations and the future potential. Die Technik des 3D-Drucks bietet viel Potenzial in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Diese neue Technologie fand bereits in unterschiedlichen Bereichen der spinalen Chirurgie Anwendung; hierzu zählen die präoperative Planung sowie die intraoperative Insertion und Herstellung von patientenspezifischen Implantaten. Zum Beispiel konnte gezeigt werden, dass die präoperative dreidimensionale Visualisierung spinaler Deformitäten in der Operationsplanung hilfreich ist und die Platzierung von Pedikelschrauben durch individuelle Templates präziser ist als in der Freihandtechnik. Das vorliegende Review fasst die aktuelle Literatur über den 3D-Druck in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie systematisch unter Berücksichtigung des aktuellen Stands der Anwendungen, der Limitierungen und des Potenzials zusammen.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Die Technik des 3D-Drucks bietet viel Potenzial in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Diese neue Technologie fand bereits in unterschiedlichen Bereichen der spinalen Chirurgie Anwendung; hierzu zählen die präoperative Planung sowie die intraoperative Insertion und Herstellung von patientenspezifischen Implantaten. Zum Beispiel konnte gezeigt werden, dass die präoperative dreidimensionale Visualisierung spinaler Deformitäten in der Operationsplanung hilfreich ist und die Platzierung von Pedikelschrauben durch individuelle Templates präziser ist als in der Freihandtechnik. Das vorliegende Review fasst die aktuelle Literatur über den 3D-Druck in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie systematisch unter Berücksichtigung des aktuellen Stands der Anwendungen, der Limitierungen und des Potenzials zusammen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35175406
doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01150-7
pii: 10.1007/s00113-022-01150-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351-360Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
Références
Ahmed AK, Pennington Z, Molina CA et al (2019) Multidisciplinary surgical planning for en bloc resection of malignant primary cervical spine tumors involving 3D-printed models and neoadjuvant therapies: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18607
doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18607
pubmed: 31860825
Amelot A, Colman M, Loret JE (2018) Vertebral body replacement using patient-specific three-dimensional-printed polymer implants in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an encouraging preliminary report. Spine J 18:892–899
pubmed: 29408349
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.019
Arbogast M, Haas JP (2020) Verletzungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Unfallchirurg 123:607–615
pubmed: 32444884
doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00818-2
Berry E, Cuppone M, Porada S et al (2005) Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219:111–118
pubmed: 15819482
doi: 10.1243/095441105X9273
Burkhard M, Fürnstahl P, Farshad M (2019) Three-dimensionally printed vertebrae with different bone densities for surgical training. Eur Spine J 28:798–806
pubmed: 30511245
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5847-y
Choy WJ, Mobbs RJ, Wilcox B et al (2017) Reconstruction of thoracic spine using a personalized 3D-printed vertebral body in adolescent with T9 primary bone tumor. World Neurosurg 105:1032.e13–1032.e17
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.133
Clifton W, Damon A, Valero-Moreno F et al (2020) The spinebox: a freely available, open-access, 3D-printed simulator design for lumbar pedicle screw placement. Cureus 12:e7738
pubmed: 32455058
pmcid: 7241219
Clifton W, Nottmeier E, Damon A et al (2019) The future of biomechanical spine research: conception and design of a dynamic 3D printed cervical myelography phantom. Cureus 11:e4591
pubmed: 31309016
pmcid: 6609301
D’urso PS, Askin G, Earwaker JS et al (1999) Spinal biomodeling. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1247–1251
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199906150-00013
Decker S, Omar M, Krettek C et al (2014) Elective thoracotomy for pedicle screw removal to prevent severe aortic bleeding. World J Clin Cases 2:100–103
pubmed: 24749121
pmcid: 3985037
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i4.100
Deng T, Jiang M, Lei Q et al (2016) The accuracy and the safety of individualized 3D printing screws insertion templates for cervical screw insertion. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 21:143–149
doi: 10.1080/24699322.2016.1236146
Dong J, Zhang S, Liu H et al (2014) Novel alternative therapy for spinal tuberculosis during surgery: reconstructing with anti-tuberculosis bioactivity implants. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 11:299–305
pubmed: 24328922
doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.872625
Garg B, Gupta M, Singh M et al (2019) Outcome and safety analysis of 3D-printed patient-specific pedicle screw jigs for complex spinal deformities: a comparative study. Spine J 19:56–64
pubmed: 29730456
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.001
Girolami M, Boriani S, Bandiera S et al (2018) Biomimetic 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction in the thoracolumbar spine: a tailored option following en bloc resection for spinal tumors : Preliminary results on a case-series of 13 patients. Eur Spine J 27:3073–3083
pubmed: 30039254
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5708-8
Izatt MT, Thorpe PL, Thompson RG et al (2007) The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:1507–1518
pubmed: 17846803
pmcid: 2200746
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3
Jiang L, Dong L, Tan M et al (2017) A modified personalized image-based drill guide template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement: a clinical study. Med Sci Monit 23:1325–1333
pubmed: 28301445
pmcid: 5365048
doi: 10.12659/MSM.900066
Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S et al (2011) Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 20:860–868
pubmed: 21384205
pmcid: 3099153
doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2
Kim D, Lim JY, Shim KW et al (2017) Sacral reconstruction with a 3D-printed implant after hemisacrectomy in a patient with sacral osteosarcoma: 1‑year follow-up result. Yonsei Med J 58:453–457
pubmed: 28120579
pmcid: 5290028
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.2.453
Kim MP, Ta AH, Ellsworth WA et al (2015) Three dimensional model for surgical planning in resection of thoracic tumors. Int J Surg Case Rep 16:127–129
pubmed: 26453940
pmcid: 4643475
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.09.037
Li C, Yang M, Xie Y et al (2015) Application of the polystyrene model made by 3‑D printing rapid prototyping technology for operation planning in revision lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Sci 20:475–480
pubmed: 25822935
doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0706-8
Lu S, Zhang YZ, Wang Z et al (2012) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patient-specific drill template. Med Biol Eng Comput 50:751–758
pubmed: 22467276
doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0900-1
Mao K, Wang Y, Xiao S et al (2010) Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study. Eur Spine J 19:797–802
pubmed: 20213294
pmcid: 2899953
doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1359-0
Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H et al (2016) Advantages and disadvantages of 3‑dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159:1485–1500
pubmed: 26832986
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017
Merc M, Drstvensek I, Vogrin M et al (2013) A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:893–899
pubmed: 23632782
doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1755-0
Merc M, Recnik G, Krajnc Z (2017) Lumbar and sacral pedicle screw placement using a template does not improve the midterm pain and disability outcome in comparison with free-hand method. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27:583–589
pubmed: 28101631
doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1904-1
Mizutani J, Matsubara T, Fukuoka M et al (2008) Application of full-scale three-dimensional models in patients with rheumatoid cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:644–649
pubmed: 18247063
pmcid: 2367409
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0611-3
Mobbs RJ, Choy WJ, Wilson P et al (2018) L5 en-bloc vertebrectomy with customized reconstructive implant: comparison of patient-specific versus off-the-shelf implant. World Neurosurg 112:94–100
pubmed: 29366999
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.078
Nasser R, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG et al (2010) Complications in spine surgery: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 13:144–157
pubmed: 20672949
doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09369
Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S et al (2016) Utility of a custom screw insertion guide and a full-scale, color-coded 3D plaster model for guiding safe surgical exposure and screw insertion during spine revision surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:94–102
pubmed: 26967985
doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15678
Pijpker PAJ, Kuijlen JMA, Kraeima J et al (2018) Three-dimensional planning and use of individualized osteotomy-guiding templates for surgical correction of kyphoscoliosis: a technical case report. World Neurosurg 119:113–117
pubmed: 30077023
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.219
Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R (2005) Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2280–2287
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182275.31425.cd
Rong X, Wang B, Chen H et al (2016) Use of rapid prototyping drill template for the expansive open door laminoplasty: a cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 150:13–17
pubmed: 27567386
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.08.013
Siu TL, Rogers JM, Lin K et al (2018) Custom-made titanium 3‑dimensional printed Interbody cages for treatment of osteoporotic fracture-related spinal deformity. World Neurosurg 111:1–5
pubmed: 29223522
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.160
Spetzger U, Frasca M, König SA (2016) Surgical planning, manufacturing and implantation of an individualized cervical fusion titanium cage using patient-specific data. Eur Spine J 25:2239–2246
pubmed: 26931333
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4473-9
Sugawara T, Kaneyama S, Higashiyama N et al (2018) Prospective multicenter study of a multistep screw insertion technique using patient-specific screw guide templates for the cervical and thoracic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:1685–1694
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002810
Swartman B, Franke J, Schnurr C et al (2020) Digitaler OP. Unfallchirurg 123:849–855
pubmed: 33034666
doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00886-4
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P et al (2016) 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. BioMed Eng OnLine 15:115
pubmed: 27769304
pmcid: 5073919
doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Thayaparan GK, Owbridge MG, Linden M et al (2020) Measuring the performance of patient-specific solutions for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. J Clin Neurosci 71:43–50
pubmed: 31843436
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.11.008
Vaishya R, Vijay V, Vaish A et al (2018) Three-dimensional printing for complex orthopedic cases and trauma: a blessing. Apollo Med 15:51–54
Wei F, Li Z, Liu Z et al (2020) Upper cervical spine reconstruction using customized 3D-printed vertebral body in 9 patients with primary tumors involving C2. Ann Transl Med 8:332–332
pubmed: 32355776
pmcid: 7186708
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.32
Wei R, Guo W, Ji T et al (2017) One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis after total en bloc sacrectomy: a technical note. Eur Spine J 26:1902–1909
pubmed: 27844229
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4871-z
Wei R, Guo W, Yang R et al (2019) Reconstruction of the pelvic ring after total en bloc sacrectomy using a 3D-printed sacral endoprosthesis with re-establishment of spinopelvic stability: a retrospective comparative study. Bone Joint J 101:880–888
pubmed: 31256665
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1010.R2
Weiss MY, Melnyk R, Mix D et al (2019) Design and validation of a cervical laminectomy simulator using 3D printing and hydrogel phantoms. Oper Neurosurg 18:202–208
doi: 10.1093/ons/opz129
Xiao JR, Huang WD, Yang XH et al (2016) En bloc resection of primary malignant bone tumor in the cervical spine based on 3‑dimensional printing technology. Orthop Surg 8:171–178
pubmed: 27384725
pmcid: 6584397
doi: 10.1111/os.12234
Yang M, Li C, Li Y et al (2015) Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine 94:e582
pubmed: 25715261
pmcid: 4554159
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000582