Distal radius fractures in the superelderly: an observational study of 8486 cases from the Swedish fracture register.
Distal radius fracture
Patient-related outcome measures
Wrist function
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2022
19 02 2022
Historique:
received:
06
11
2021
accepted:
08
02
2022
entrez:
20
2
2022
pubmed:
21
2
2022
medline:
19
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture in adults. With an ageing population, the number of wrist fractures in the superelderly (≥ 80 years) is expected to rise. Optimal treatment for displaced DRFs remains controversial, especially in the superelderly group. In addition, basic knowledge of the outcome after a DRF in this heterogenic group is lacking. The aim of this study was to study injury characteristics, treatment and outcome of DRFs in superelderly patients using data from a large national register. We used prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register. All distal radius fractures registered between April 2012 and December 2018 in patients ≥ 80 years of age were included. Data on epidemiology, fracture type, trauma mechanism and treatment are registered by the physician treating the patient. Patients are also sent a subjective outcome questionnaire including EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-score) at the time of injury and after 12 months. The 12-month questionnaire was sent to those who had completed the questionnaire at the time of injury. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess differences between treatment methods. Mean age for this population was 86 years (80-105 years), a majority of the patients were female (86.7%). The dominating injury mechanism was a simple fall (74.6%) in the patient's residence. The majority of fractures were AO type A (70%) followed by AO type C (20.9%) and type B (8.6%). The incidence of open fractures was significantly higher in females (2.6%) compared to males (1.5%). A majority of the fractures were treated with a cast (87.5%) with volar locking plate as the second most common treatment method (6.6%). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and the Arm Hand Function Index of the SMFA-score deteriorated somewhat one year after injury compared to pre-injury. PROMs did not correlate to treatment with cast or a volar plate. This nationwide register study provides detailed data on DRFs in the superelderly regarding epidemiology, treatment and self-reported outcome. A good self-reported outcome is possible, but many patients do not recover completely. PROMs did not correlate to type of treatment. The frequency of open fractures was significantly higher in females. The reason for this is unclear but different skin thickness in older males versus females may be one explanation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture in adults. With an ageing population, the number of wrist fractures in the superelderly (≥ 80 years) is expected to rise. Optimal treatment for displaced DRFs remains controversial, especially in the superelderly group. In addition, basic knowledge of the outcome after a DRF in this heterogenic group is lacking. The aim of this study was to study injury characteristics, treatment and outcome of DRFs in superelderly patients using data from a large national register.
METHODS
We used prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register. All distal radius fractures registered between April 2012 and December 2018 in patients ≥ 80 years of age were included. Data on epidemiology, fracture type, trauma mechanism and treatment are registered by the physician treating the patient. Patients are also sent a subjective outcome questionnaire including EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-score) at the time of injury and after 12 months. The 12-month questionnaire was sent to those who had completed the questionnaire at the time of injury. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess differences between treatment methods.
RESULTS
Mean age for this population was 86 years (80-105 years), a majority of the patients were female (86.7%). The dominating injury mechanism was a simple fall (74.6%) in the patient's residence. The majority of fractures were AO type A (70%) followed by AO type C (20.9%) and type B (8.6%). The incidence of open fractures was significantly higher in females (2.6%) compared to males (1.5%). A majority of the fractures were treated with a cast (87.5%) with volar locking plate as the second most common treatment method (6.6%). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and the Arm Hand Function Index of the SMFA-score deteriorated somewhat one year after injury compared to pre-injury. PROMs did not correlate to treatment with cast or a volar plate.
CONCLUSIONS
This nationwide register study provides detailed data on DRFs in the superelderly regarding epidemiology, treatment and self-reported outcome. A good self-reported outcome is possible, but many patients do not recover completely. PROMs did not correlate to type of treatment. The frequency of open fractures was significantly higher in females. The reason for this is unclear but different skin thickness in older males versus females may be one explanation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35183121
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02825-x
pii: 10.1186/s12877-022-02825-x
pmc: PMC8857784
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2020 Mar;25(1):26-31
pubmed: 32000600
ISRN Orthop. 2014 Mar 04;2014:189803
pubmed: 24967123
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Nov;29(6):1121-7
pubmed: 15576226
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10 Suppl):S1-133
pubmed: 18277234
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Apr;22(4):1211-8
pubmed: 20552329
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7
pubmed: 16814787
Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jun;3(2):101-105
pubmed: 22798966
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):818-23
pubmed: 26033063
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 10;18(1):251
pubmed: 28601085
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2579-2583
pubmed: 27645617
J Wrist Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):305-311
pubmed: 31404224
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug;70(4):649-51
pubmed: 3403617
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):572-580
pubmed: 28836456
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487-92
pubmed: 22881367
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Dec;74(6):756-63
pubmed: 14763711
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jan;44(1):18-26
pubmed: 30420192
Injury. 2005 Dec;36(12):1435-9
pubmed: 16256994
J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):939-42; discussion 942-3
pubmed: 21986738
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 26;22(1):587
pubmed: 34174861
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Feb;74(1):98-100
pubmed: 12635802
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):453-8
pubmed: 773941
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Apr;31(4):633-9
pubmed: 16632059
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1851-7
pubmed: 20686059
Dermatoendocrinol. 2012 Jul 1;4(3):280-4
pubmed: 23467395
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):963-9
pubmed: 24986952
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):278
pubmed: 28659134
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):27-32
pubmed: 12357561
Acta Orthop. 2021 Dec;92(6):739-745
pubmed: 34309486
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Sep;32(7):962-70
pubmed: 17826547
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207702
pubmed: 30444926
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):189-94
pubmed: 25192864
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May 21;13:325-333
pubmed: 34045902
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50393
pubmed: 23226273
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):40-46
pubmed: 33103546
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):388-395
pubmed: 33042641
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 May 31;8:48
pubmed: 17540030
Injury. 2009 Oct;40(10):1111-4
pubmed: 19596316
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Nov;43(9):974-982
pubmed: 30016904
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):961-969
pubmed: 31169572
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127-137
pubmed: 28194657
Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):478-82
pubmed: 26620119
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 8;21(1):88
pubmed: 32035488
Injury. 2018 Jun;49 Suppl 1:S29-S32
pubmed: 29929689