The conceptual framework for a combined food literacy and physical activity intervention to optimize metabolic health among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda.
Food literacy
Intervention mapping protocol
Metabolic health
Physical activity
Women of reproductive age
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2022
18 02 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2021
accepted:
08
02
2022
entrez:
20
2
2022
pubmed:
21
2
2022
medline:
20
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metabolic health of urban Ugandans, mostly women, has increasingly become sub-optimal. As women are strategic for family behavioral change and do not meet WHO recommendations regarding dietary and physical activity (PA), there is an urgent need for science-based interventions to tackle unhealthy dietary and PA behaviors. To develop a food literacy and PA promotion intervention to optimise metabolic health among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda. Steps 1- 6 of the Intervention Mapping protocol were used to design the intervention. Notable determinants from Step 1 were health/beauty paradox, nonfactual nutrition information, socio-cultural misconceptions around moderate PA, fruits, and vegetables. Others included gaps in food/PA knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy. We hypothesised that changing the overall existing behaviours in one intervention may meet strong resistance. Thus, we decided to go for gradual stepwise changes. Hence in step 2, three behavioural intervention objectives were formulated; (1) women evaluate the accuracy of nutrition and PA information., (2) engage in moderate intensity PA for at least 150 min a week, and (3) consume at least one portion of vegetables and one portion of fruit every day. Based on the food literacy model, intervention objectives were formulated into performance objectives and matrices of change objectives. In step 3 a combination of eleven behavioural change techniques were selected and translated into practical strategies to effect changes in determinants. In step 4, intervention components and materials were developed. The intervention consists of five interactive group sessions, 150 min each. Infographics on benefits/recommendations, vegetable recipes, and practical tips to eat more fruits, vegetables, and to engage more in PA are included. Personalised goals and action plans tailored to personal metabolic health and lifestyle needs, and environmental opportunities form the basis of the intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted to evaluate the intervention ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04635332 ). The intervention is novel, based on a holistic food literacy model. The intervention is built on determinants specific to urban Uganda, evidence based behavioural change theoretical models and techniques, detailing the hypothesised behavioural change mechanism. If effective, an evidence-based intervention will become available for reference in urban Uganda.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Metabolic health of urban Ugandans, mostly women, has increasingly become sub-optimal. As women are strategic for family behavioral change and do not meet WHO recommendations regarding dietary and physical activity (PA), there is an urgent need for science-based interventions to tackle unhealthy dietary and PA behaviors.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a food literacy and PA promotion intervention to optimise metabolic health among women of reproductive age in urban Uganda.
METHODOLOGY
Steps 1- 6 of the Intervention Mapping protocol were used to design the intervention.
RESULTS
Notable determinants from Step 1 were health/beauty paradox, nonfactual nutrition information, socio-cultural misconceptions around moderate PA, fruits, and vegetables. Others included gaps in food/PA knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy. We hypothesised that changing the overall existing behaviours in one intervention may meet strong resistance. Thus, we decided to go for gradual stepwise changes. Hence in step 2, three behavioural intervention objectives were formulated; (1) women evaluate the accuracy of nutrition and PA information., (2) engage in moderate intensity PA for at least 150 min a week, and (3) consume at least one portion of vegetables and one portion of fruit every day. Based on the food literacy model, intervention objectives were formulated into performance objectives and matrices of change objectives. In step 3 a combination of eleven behavioural change techniques were selected and translated into practical strategies to effect changes in determinants. In step 4, intervention components and materials were developed. The intervention consists of five interactive group sessions, 150 min each. Infographics on benefits/recommendations, vegetable recipes, and practical tips to eat more fruits, vegetables, and to engage more in PA are included. Personalised goals and action plans tailored to personal metabolic health and lifestyle needs, and environmental opportunities form the basis of the intervention. A randomized controlled trial is being conducted to evaluate the intervention ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04635332 ).
CONCLUSIONS
The intervention is novel, based on a holistic food literacy model. The intervention is built on determinants specific to urban Uganda, evidence based behavioural change theoretical models and techniques, detailing the hypothesised behavioural change mechanism. If effective, an evidence-based intervention will become available for reference in urban Uganda.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35183134
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12740-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-12740-w
pmc: PMC8856934
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04635332']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;85(12):1182-1198
pubmed: 29189034
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):18-29
pubmed: 23249643
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2021 Feb 15;:
pubmed: 33594848
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020 Mar;16(3):177-189
pubmed: 32020062
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Mar;18(4):649-58
pubmed: 24844778
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 07;11(4):
pubmed: 30959958
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jan;5(1):53-64
pubmed: 27743978
BMJ. 2012 Sep 04;345:e5661
pubmed: 22951546
PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442
pubmed: 17132052
Health Educ Behav. 2007 Dec;34(6):881-96
pubmed: 17602096
Health Promot Perspect. 2016 Aug 10;6(3):111-8
pubmed: 27579254
Appetite. 2014 May;76:50-9
pubmed: 24462490
Adv Nutr. 2020 Jan 1;11(1):25-34
pubmed: 31504115
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67
pubmed: 26174515
Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98
pubmed: 21678185
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Aug;20(12):2104-2113
pubmed: 28578729
Diabetologia. 2015 Nov;58(11):2615-26
pubmed: 26248646
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 7;17(1):127
pubmed: 33028335
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Dec;53(12):2117-8
pubmed: 18077747
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2406-2415
pubmed: 28653598
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Nov-Dec;11(2):87-98
pubmed: 10163601
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2616-22
pubmed: 15173153
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jan;63:135-43
pubmed: 26444587
Obes Rev. 2013 Jun;14(6):435-50
pubmed: 23534901
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Sep;30(7):863-74
pubmed: 25124084
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(18):3070-3084
pubmed: 29039967
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 24;15(1):70
pubmed: 30041699
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3624-3636
pubmed: 33000718
Br J Nutr. 2020 Oct 28;124(8):761-772
pubmed: 32460934
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Lancet. 2010 Nov 20;376(9754):1775-84
pubmed: 21074255
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Mar;10(1):62-86
pubmed: 29446541
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 18;15(1):54
pubmed: 29914503
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701
pubmed: 19916637
Obes Rev. 2011 Jul;12(7):e602-20
pubmed: 21521451
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-4
pubmed: 10480822