IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by peripheral nerve excitability testing (NET).
Analgesics
Biomarkers
Ectopic impulse generation
Healthy subjects
Hyperalgesia
Nerve excitability testing
PK/PD
Pain
RCT
Threshold tracking
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Feb 2022
19 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2021
accepted:
05
02
2022
entrez:
20
2
2022
pubmed:
21
2
2022
medline:
23
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few new drugs have been developed for chronic pain. Drug development is challenged by uncertainty about whether the drug engages the human target sufficiently to have a meaningful pharmacodynamic effect. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 is one of four similarly designed studies that aim to link different functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics. This study focusses on biomarkers derived from nerve excitability testing (NET) using threshold tracking of the peripheral nervous system. This is a multisite single-dose, subject and assessor-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from NET of large sensory and motor fibers and small sensory fibers using perception threshold tracking will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose with at least 1 week apart. Motor and sensory NET will be assessed on the right wrist in a non-sensitized normal condition while perception threshold tracking will be performed bilaterally on both non-sensitized and sensitized forearm skin. Cutaneous high-frequency electrical stimulation is used to induce hyperalgesia. Blood samples will be taken for pharmacokinetic purposes and pain ratings as well as predictive psychological traits will be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split across the two primary outcomes: strength-duration time constant (SDTC; a measure of passive membrane properties and nodal persistent Na Measurements of NET using threshold tracking protocols are sensitive to membrane potential at the site of stimulation. Sets of useful indices of axonal excitability collectively may provide insights into the mechanisms responsible for membrane polarization, ion channel function, and activity of ionic pumps during the process of impulse conduction. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 hypothesizes that NET can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs in this compartment of the nociceptive system for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification. This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019-000942-36 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Few new drugs have been developed for chronic pain. Drug development is challenged by uncertainty about whether the drug engages the human target sufficiently to have a meaningful pharmacodynamic effect. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 is one of four similarly designed studies that aim to link different functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics. This study focusses on biomarkers derived from nerve excitability testing (NET) using threshold tracking of the peripheral nervous system.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a multisite single-dose, subject and assessor-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from NET of large sensory and motor fibers and small sensory fibers using perception threshold tracking will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose with at least 1 week apart. Motor and sensory NET will be assessed on the right wrist in a non-sensitized normal condition while perception threshold tracking will be performed bilaterally on both non-sensitized and sensitized forearm skin. Cutaneous high-frequency electrical stimulation is used to induce hyperalgesia. Blood samples will be taken for pharmacokinetic purposes and pain ratings as well as predictive psychological traits will be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split across the two primary outcomes: strength-duration time constant (SDTC; a measure of passive membrane properties and nodal persistent Na
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Measurements of NET using threshold tracking protocols are sensitive to membrane potential at the site of stimulation. Sets of useful indices of axonal excitability collectively may provide insights into the mechanisms responsible for membrane polarization, ion channel function, and activity of ionic pumps during the process of impulse conduction. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 hypothesizes that NET can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs in this compartment of the nociceptive system for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019-000942-36 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35183242
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06087-1
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06087-1
pmc: PMC8857873
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Pregabalin
55JG375S6M
Lacosamide
563KS2PQY5
Tapentadol
H8A007M585
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : No 777500
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec;104(6):1136-1145
pubmed: 29672831
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):586-604
pubmed: 19051220
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;50(8):941-50
pubmed: 20147618
Pharmacology. 2012;90(1-2):40-6
pubmed: 22722651
Pain. 2016 Apr;157(4):791-796
pubmed: 26670465
Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):263-275
pubmed: 30649227
Muscle Nerve. 1998 Feb;21(2):137-58
pubmed: 9466589
EBioMedicine. 2019 Jan;39:401-408
pubmed: 30503201
Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):150-8
pubmed: 17237664
Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):81-8
pubmed: 23148731
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jun;25(5):376-85
pubmed: 19454870
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1407-1415
pubmed: 34030050
Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1532-1539
pubmed: 21440369
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 May;121(5):719-24
pubmed: 20097124
Stat Med. 1991 Jun;10(6):901-6; discussion 906-7
pubmed: 1876780
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010 Sep;19(9):1129-34
pubmed: 20687785
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Drugs R D. 2015 Jun;15(2):195-201
pubmed: 25939332
Brain. 2000 Dec;123 Pt 12:2542-51
pubmed: 11099455
Pain. 2009 Nov;146(1-2):65-74
pubmed: 19665301
Trials. 2021 Jun 17;22(1):404
pubmed: 34140041
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):151-62
pubmed: 21162697
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):839-41
pubmed: 20067958
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2302-9
pubmed: 24848284
J Pain. 2009 Aug;10(8):818-28
pubmed: 19409861
Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Oct;22(5):460-6
pubmed: 19625961
J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 28;24(4):964-71
pubmed: 14749441
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr;111(8):1564-73
pubmed: 24453277
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):535-8
pubmed: 20975469
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Sep 1;124(3):883-894
pubmed: 32783585
Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Sep;34(9):617-26
pubmed: 25078976