First dose ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A pooled self-controlled case series study of 11.6 million individuals in England, Scotland, and Wales.
Adult
Aged
BNT162 Vaccine
/ adverse effects
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ adverse effects
Case-Control Studies
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2
/ pathogenicity
Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial
/ etiology
United Kingdom
Vaccination
/ statistics & numerical data
Wales
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
20
08
2021
accepted:
21
01
2022
entrez:
22
2
2022
pubmed:
23
2
2022
medline:
3
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several countries restricted the administration of ChAdOx1 to older age groups in 2021 over safety concerns following case reports and observed versus expected analyses suggesting a possible association with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Large datasets are required to precisely estimate the association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and CVST due to the extreme rarity of this event. We aimed to accomplish this by combining national data from England, Scotland, and Wales. We created data platforms consisting of linked primary care, secondary care, mortality, and virological testing data in each of England, Scotland, and Wales, with a combined cohort of 11,637,157 people and 6,808,293 person years of follow-up. The cohort start date was December 8, 2020, and the end date was June 30, 2021. The outcome measure we examined was incident CVST events recorded in either primary or secondary care records. We carried out a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis of this outcome following first dose vaccination with ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2. The observation period consisted of an initial 90-day reference period, followed by a 2-week prerisk period directly prior to vaccination, and a 4-week risk period following vaccination. Counts of CVST cases from each country were tallied, then expanded into a full dataset with 1 row for each individual and observation time period. There was a combined total of 201 incident CVST events in the cohorts (29.5 per million person years). There were 81 CVST events in the observation period among those who a received first dose of ChAdOx1 (approximately 16.34 per million doses) and 40 for those who received a first dose of BNT162b2 (approximately 12.60 per million doses). We fitted conditional Poisson models to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Vaccination with ChAdOx1 was associated with an elevated risk of incident CVST events in the 28 days following vaccination, IRR = 1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 3.11). We did not find an association between BNT162b2 and CVST in the 28 days following vaccination, IRR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.77). Our study had some limitations. The SCCS study design implicitly controls for variables that are constant over the observation period, but also assumes that outcome events are independent of exposure. This assumption may not be satisfied in the case of CVST, firstly because it is a serious adverse event, and secondly because the vaccination programme in the United Kingdom prioritised the clinically extremely vulnerable and those with underlying health conditions, which may have caused a selection effect for individuals more prone to CVST. Although we pooled data from several large datasets, there was still a low number of events, which may have caused imprecision in our estimates. In this study, we observed a small elevated risk of CVST events following vaccination with ChAdOx1, but not BNT162b2. Our analysis pooled information from large datasets from England, Scotland, and Wales. This evidence may be useful in risk-benefit analyses of vaccine policies and in providing quantification of risks associated with vaccination to the general public.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Several countries restricted the administration of ChAdOx1 to older age groups in 2021 over safety concerns following case reports and observed versus expected analyses suggesting a possible association with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Large datasets are required to precisely estimate the association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and CVST due to the extreme rarity of this event. We aimed to accomplish this by combining national data from England, Scotland, and Wales.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We created data platforms consisting of linked primary care, secondary care, mortality, and virological testing data in each of England, Scotland, and Wales, with a combined cohort of 11,637,157 people and 6,808,293 person years of follow-up. The cohort start date was December 8, 2020, and the end date was June 30, 2021. The outcome measure we examined was incident CVST events recorded in either primary or secondary care records. We carried out a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis of this outcome following first dose vaccination with ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2. The observation period consisted of an initial 90-day reference period, followed by a 2-week prerisk period directly prior to vaccination, and a 4-week risk period following vaccination. Counts of CVST cases from each country were tallied, then expanded into a full dataset with 1 row for each individual and observation time period. There was a combined total of 201 incident CVST events in the cohorts (29.5 per million person years). There were 81 CVST events in the observation period among those who a received first dose of ChAdOx1 (approximately 16.34 per million doses) and 40 for those who received a first dose of BNT162b2 (approximately 12.60 per million doses). We fitted conditional Poisson models to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Vaccination with ChAdOx1 was associated with an elevated risk of incident CVST events in the 28 days following vaccination, IRR = 1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 3.11). We did not find an association between BNT162b2 and CVST in the 28 days following vaccination, IRR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.77). Our study had some limitations. The SCCS study design implicitly controls for variables that are constant over the observation period, but also assumes that outcome events are independent of exposure. This assumption may not be satisfied in the case of CVST, firstly because it is a serious adverse event, and secondly because the vaccination programme in the United Kingdom prioritised the clinically extremely vulnerable and those with underlying health conditions, which may have caused a selection effect for individuals more prone to CVST. Although we pooled data from several large datasets, there was still a low number of events, which may have caused imprecision in our estimates.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we observed a small elevated risk of CVST events following vaccination with ChAdOx1, but not BNT162b2. Our analysis pooled information from large datasets from England, Scotland, and Wales. This evidence may be useful in risk-benefit analyses of vaccine policies and in providing quantification of risks associated with vaccination to the general public.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35192598
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003927
pii: PMEDICINE-D-21-03598
pmc: PMC8863261
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1003927Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19004
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00022/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SCAF/15/02
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19075
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V028367/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_20058
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC 19075
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests. AS is a member of the Scottish Government Chief Medical Officer’s COVID-19 Advisory Group and the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats (NERVTAG) Risk Stratification Subgroup and AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Thrombocytopenia Taskforce; all roles are remunerated to AS or his institution. AS and SS are members of the editorial board of PLOS Medicine. CRS declares funding from the MRC, NIHR, CSO and New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment and Health Research Council during the conduct of this study. SVK is co-chair of the Scottish Government’s Expert Reference Group on COVID-19 and ethnicity, is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE) subgroup on ethnicity and acknowledges funding from a NRS Senior Clinical Fellowship, MRC and CSO. CR is a member of the Scottish Government Chief Medical Officer’s COVID-19 Advisory Group, SPI-M, MHRA Vaccine Benefit and Risk Working Group. HRS is an advisor to the Scottish Parliament’s COVID-19 Committee. RKO is a member of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisal Committee. DB is employed by Queen’s University Belfast, the Public Health Agency and the Department of Health (Northern Ireland). DB is a member of several Northern Ireland and UK government COVID-19 advisory boards, including the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling and the UK Vaccine Effectiveness Expert Panel, and has represented Northern Ireland on the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and its subgroups. SdeL through his University holds grants from AstraZeneca, Eli-Lilly, GSK, MSD, Sanofi and Seqirus. He has been advisory board members for Astra Zeneca, Sanofi and Seqirus. MW is a member of UK government COVID-19 advisory group, SPI-M, and a member of Scottish Government COVID-19 Advisory Group. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2021 Mar 11;372:n699
pubmed: 33707182
BMJ. 2016 Sep 12;354:i4515
pubmed: 27618829
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):664-70
pubmed: 14976332
BMJ. 2021 Aug 26;374:n1931
pubmed: 34446426
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Nov;27(5):E3
pubmed: 19877794
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101
pubmed: 33835769
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):105923
pubmed: 34627592
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2124-2130
pubmed: 33835768
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2202-2211
pubmed: 33861525
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1646-1657
pubmed: 33901420
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1290-1297
pubmed: 34108714
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2448-2456
pubmed: 33929487
BMJ. 2021 May 5;373:n1114
pubmed: 33952445
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3731
pubmed: 33082154