Clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of bempedoic acid for LDL-C lowering therapy in patients at high cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
clinical pharmacology
clinical trials
ischaemic heart disease
preventive medicine
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Feb 2022
24 Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
23
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bempedoic acid (BA) is a novel oral low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering drug. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess efficacy and safety for clinical outcomes in high cardiovascular (CV) risk patients. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trial Results and the American College of Cardiology web site were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of BA versus placebo in high CV risk patients reporting clinical outcomes were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, CV mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). Safety outcomes included new onset or worsening of diabetes mellitus (DM), muscular disorders, gout and worsening of renal function. Six RCTs with a total of 3956 patients and follow-ups of four to 52 weeks were identified. Heterogeneity mainly derived from differing follow-up duration and baseline CV risk. No difference in MACE (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.15), all-cause mortality (OR 2.37; CI 0.80 to 6.99) and CV mortality (OR 1.66; CI 0.45 to 6.04) for BA versus placebo was observed. BA showed beneficial trends for non-fatal MI (OR 0.57; CI 0.32 to 1.00) and was associated with a lower risk of new-onset or worsening of DM (OR 0.68; CI 0.49 to 0.94), but higher risk of gout (OR 3.29; CI 1.28 to 8.46) and a trend for muscular disorders (OR 2.60; CI 1.15 to 5.91) and worsening of renal function (OR 4.24; CI 0.98 to 18.39). BA in high CV risk patients showed no significant effects on major CV outcomes in short-term follow-up. Unfavourable effects on muscular disorders, renal function and gout sound a note of caution. Hence, further studies with longer term follow-up in carefully selected populations are needed to clarify the risk/benefit ratio of this novel therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35210334
pii: bmjopen-2021-048893
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048893
pmc: PMC8883220
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholesterol, LDL
0
Dicarboxylic Acids
0
Fatty Acids
0
8-hydroxy-2,2,14,14-tetramethylpentadecanedioic acid
1EJ6Z6Q368
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e048893Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MB reported personal fees for speaking at an expert meeting in lipidology sponsored by Daiichi-Sankyo after primary submission of the current work.
Références
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):380-388
pubmed: 29273856
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020 Dec 4;21(1):86
pubmed: 33276805
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 16;17(7):e1003121
pubmed: 32673317
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec;1(6):e001800
pubmed: 23316314
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1780-1788
pubmed: 31714986
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2097-2107
pubmed: 30403574
Psychol Bull. 1968 Apr;69(4):269-277
pubmed: 5659656
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jan;41(1):19-28
pubmed: 33368025
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Aug 12;19(1):128
pubmed: 32787939
BMJ. 2011 Feb 10;342:d549
pubmed: 21310794
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Feb 19;29(1):5-115
pubmed: 34558602
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Mar;34(3):676-83
pubmed: 24385236
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jun;12(6):e005375
pubmed: 31163980
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Dec;7(4):267-75
pubmed: 3802849
Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1397-405
pubmed: 25579834
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2295-312
pubmed: 12210615
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1566-1579
pubmed: 29677301
Prog Lipid Res. 2020 Jan;77:101006
pubmed: 31499095
Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 24;3:82
pubmed: 25056145
J Clin Lipidol. 2012 May-Jun;6(3):208-15
pubmed: 22658145
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 7;39(14):1172-1180
pubmed: 29069377
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Apr;27(6):593-603
pubmed: 31357887
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97
pubmed: 26039521
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-1722
pubmed: 28304224
Lancet. 1994 Nov 19;344(8934):1383-9
pubmed: 7968073
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;5(10):1124-1135
pubmed: 32609313
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1022-1032
pubmed: 30865796
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):526-34
pubmed: 23546564
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188
pubmed: 31504418
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Oct;277:195-203
pubmed: 29910030
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3168-3209
pubmed: 30423391
Lancet. 2002 Apr 20;359(9315):1379-87
pubmed: 11978335
Heart Fail Rev. 2020 Nov;25(6):1077-1088
pubmed: 31832834
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(7):e011662
pubmed: 30922146
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120