Host-symbiont stress response to lack-of-sulfide in the giant ciliate mutualism.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
01
07
2021
accepted:
05
02
2022
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The mutualism between the thioautotrophic bacterial ectosymbiont Candidatus Thiobius zoothamnicola and the giant ciliate Zoothamnium niveum thrives in a variety of shallow-water marine environments with highly fluctuating sulfide emissions. To persist over time, both partners must reproduce and ensure the transmission of symbionts before the sulfide stops, which enables carbon fixation of the symbiont and nourishment of the host. We experimentally investigated the response of this mutualism to depletion of sulfide. We found that colonies released some initially present but also newly produced macrozooids until death, but in fewer numbers than when exposed to sulfide. The symbionts on the colonies proliferated less without sulfide, and became larger and more rod-shaped than symbionts from freshly collected colonies that were exposed to sulfide and oxygen. The symbiotic monolayer was severely disturbed by growth of other microbes and loss of symbionts. We conclude that the response of both partners to the termination of sulfide emission was remarkably quick. The development and the release of swarmers continued until host died and thus this behavior contributed to the continuation of the association.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35213532
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254910
pii: PONE-D-21-21486
pmc: PMC8880863
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sulfides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0254910Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):1190-8
pubmed: 14766605
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Oct;6(10):725-40
pubmed: 18794911
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Mar;8(3):218-30
pubmed: 20157340
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):805-12
pubmed: 16345378
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):2014-21
pubmed: 16517650
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):11300-5
pubmed: 26283348
Lab Invest. 1966 Jan;15(1 Pt 2):368-79
pubmed: 5326609
mSystems. 2021 Jun 29;6(3):e0118620
pubmed: 34058098
Mar Environ Res. 2009 Mar;67(2):83-8
pubmed: 19131100
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Apr;67(4):1085-1094
pubmed: 27926819
J Bacteriol. 1990 Feb;172(2):762-70
pubmed: 1688842
Eur J Protistol. 2018 Feb;62:43-55
pubmed: 29202309
ISME J. 2018 Mar;12(3):714-727
pubmed: 29426952
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 22;274(1623):2259-69
pubmed: 17660153
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Feb;67(2):261-7
pubmed: 19120467
Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999 Sep;22(3):434-44
pubmed: 10553296
Microsc Res Tech. 2012 Aug;75(8):1136-46
pubmed: 22438018
Front Microbiol. 2014 Apr 07;5:145
pubmed: 24778630
Mar Biol. 2009;156(4):669-677
pubmed: 32921817
Cytometry. 1993;14(2):136-43
pubmed: 7679962
Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:33-53
pubmed: 9558453
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Apr;37(4):686-92
pubmed: 16345366
Trends Microbiol. 2005 Sep;13(9):439-48
pubmed: 16054816
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0162834
pubmed: 27683199
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 21;9(1):15081
pubmed: 31636334
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3304-13
pubmed: 19346359