Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2-positive parturients across 10 maternity units in the north-west of England: a retrospective cohort study.
COVID-19
general anaesthesia
labour analgesia
pregnancy
regional anaesthesia
Journal
Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
06
01
2022
received:
25
11
2021
accepted:
06
01
2022
pubmed:
1
3
2022
medline:
29
3
2022
entrez:
28
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have reported anaesthetic outcomes in parturients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We reviewed the labour analgesic and anaesthetic interventions utilised in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients who had a confirmed positive test for SARS-CoV-2 across 10 hospitals in the north-west of England between 1 April 2020 and 31 May 2021. Primary outcomes analysed included the analgesic/anaesthetic technique utilised for labour and caesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of maternal characteristics, caesarean birth rate, maternal critical care admission rate along with adverse composite neonatal outcomes. A positive SARS-CoV-2 test was recorded in 836 parturients with 263 (31.4%) reported to have symptoms of COVID-19. Neuraxial labour analgesia was utilised in 104 (20.4%) of the 509 parturients who went on to have a vaginal birth. No differences in epidural analgesia rates were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.64-1.67; p = 0.90). The neuraxial anaesthesia rate in 310 parturients who underwent caesarean delivery was 94.2% (95%CI 90.6-96.0%). The rates of general anaesthesia were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.52). Symptomatic parturients were more likely to be multiparous (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.19-2.22; p = 0.002); of Asian ethnicity (OR 1.54, 1.04-2.28; p = 0.03); to deliver prematurely (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.47-3.19; p = 0.001); have a higher caesarean birth rate (44.5% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16-2.12; p = 0.008); and a higher critical care utilisation rate both pre- (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and post-delivery (11% vs. 3.5%; OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.83-6.52; p = 0.001). Eight neonates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 while no differences in adverse composite neonatal outcomes were observed between those born to symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers (25.8% vs. 23.8%; OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.78-1.57; p = 0.55). In women with COVID-19, non-neuraxial analgesic regimens were commonly utilised for labour while neuraxial anaesthesia was employed for the majority of caesarean births. Symptomatic women with COVID-19 are at increased risk of significant maternal morbidity including preterm birth, caesarean birth and peripartum critical care admission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35226768
doi: 10.1111/anae.15672
pmc: PMC9111485
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
389-397Investigateurs
K Bhatia
(K)
M Columb
(M)
E Eslam
(E)
C Shelton
(C)
J Lie
(J)
S Leach
(S)
O Froud
(O)
D Verma
(D)
P Sturgess
(P)
A Sawyerr
(A)
J Desai
(J)
N Gould
(N)
S Kumari
(S)
U Sen
(U)
P Verma
(P)
P Kamath
(P)
A Koirala
(A)
S Kimber-Craig
(S)
J Eccles
(J)
A Bewlay
(A)
M Radwan
(M)
J Johal
(J)
H Bennett
(H)
E Thompson
(E)
M Hulgur
(M)
J Christian
(J)
A Aiyad
(A)
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Association of Anaesthetists.
Références
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Aug;47(8):2659-2665
pubmed: 33987925
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug;43:1-8
pubmed: 32437912
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):7-15
pubmed: 32265365
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):36-46
pubmed: 33148440
BMJ. 2020 Jun 8;369:m2107
pubmed: 32513659
Anaesthesia. 2022 Jan;77(1):22-27
pubmed: 34700360
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251123
pubmed: 33951100
Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):3-5
pubmed: 17324171
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320
pubmed: 32873575
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):580-587
pubmed: 32736825
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Aug;25:100446
pubmed: 32838230
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):817-826
pubmed: 33885740
Anaesthesia. 2021 Feb;76(2):174-181
pubmed: 33022093
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Oct;40(5):100937
pubmed: 34391984
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun 09;:1-8
pubmed: 34107853
Anesth Analg. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):462-473
pubmed: 33830956
Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1350-1363
pubmed: 32344456
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Aug;47:103188
pubmed: 34049775
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186567
pubmed: 30646335
Anaesthesia. 2021 Mar;76(3):312-319
pubmed: 33073371
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):522.e1-522.e11
pubmed: 34023315
Anaesthesia. 2020 Aug;75(8):1119-1120
pubmed: 32406526
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):510.e1-510.e12
pubmed: 33221292
Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1208-1210
pubmed: 27655279