Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2-positive parturients across 10 maternity units in the north-west of England: a retrospective cohort study.


Journal

Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2022
Historique:
revised: 06 01 2022
received: 25 11 2021
accepted: 06 01 2022
pubmed: 1 3 2022
medline: 29 3 2022
entrez: 28 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have reported anaesthetic outcomes in parturients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We reviewed the labour analgesic and anaesthetic interventions utilised in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients who had a confirmed positive test for SARS-CoV-2 across 10 hospitals in the north-west of England between 1 April 2020 and 31 May 2021. Primary outcomes analysed included the analgesic/anaesthetic technique utilised for labour and caesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of maternal characteristics, caesarean birth rate, maternal critical care admission rate along with adverse composite neonatal outcomes. A positive SARS-CoV-2 test was recorded in 836 parturients with 263 (31.4%) reported to have symptoms of COVID-19. Neuraxial labour analgesia was utilised in 104 (20.4%) of the 509 parturients who went on to have a vaginal birth. No differences in epidural analgesia rates were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.64-1.67; p = 0.90). The neuraxial anaesthesia rate in 310 parturients who underwent caesarean delivery was 94.2% (95%CI 90.6-96.0%). The rates of general anaesthesia were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.52). Symptomatic parturients were more likely to be multiparous (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.19-2.22; p = 0.002); of Asian ethnicity (OR 1.54, 1.04-2.28; p = 0.03); to deliver prematurely (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.47-3.19; p = 0.001); have a higher caesarean birth rate (44.5% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16-2.12; p = 0.008); and a higher critical care utilisation rate both pre- (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and post-delivery (11% vs. 3.5%; OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.83-6.52; p = 0.001). Eight neonates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 while no differences in adverse composite neonatal outcomes were observed between those born to symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers (25.8% vs. 23.8%; OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.78-1.57; p = 0.55). In women with COVID-19, non-neuraxial analgesic regimens were commonly utilised for labour while neuraxial anaesthesia was employed for the majority of caesarean births. Symptomatic women with COVID-19 are at increased risk of significant maternal morbidity including preterm birth, caesarean birth and peripartum critical care admission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35226768
doi: 10.1111/anae.15672
pmc: PMC9111485
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

389-397

Investigateurs

K Bhatia (K)
M Columb (M)
E Eslam (E)
C Shelton (C)
J Lie (J)
S Leach (S)
O Froud (O)
D Verma (D)
P Sturgess (P)
A Sawyerr (A)
J Desai (J)
N Gould (N)
S Kumari (S)
U Sen (U)
P Verma (P)
P Kamath (P)
A Koirala (A)
S Kimber-Craig (S)
J Eccles (J)
A Bewlay (A)
M Radwan (M)
J Johal (J)
H Bennett (H)
E Thompson (E)
M Hulgur (M)
J Christian (J)
A Aiyad (A)

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Association of Anaesthetists.

Références

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Aug;47(8):2659-2665
pubmed: 33987925
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug;43:1-8
pubmed: 32437912
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):7-15
pubmed: 32265365
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):36-46
pubmed: 33148440
BMJ. 2020 Jun 8;369:m2107
pubmed: 32513659
Anaesthesia. 2022 Jan;77(1):22-27
pubmed: 34700360
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251123
pubmed: 33951100
Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):3-5
pubmed: 17324171
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m3320
pubmed: 32873575
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):580-587
pubmed: 32736825
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Aug;25:100446
pubmed: 32838230
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):817-826
pubmed: 33885740
Anaesthesia. 2021 Feb;76(2):174-181
pubmed: 33022093
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Oct;40(5):100937
pubmed: 34391984
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun 09;:1-8
pubmed: 34107853
Anesth Analg. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):462-473
pubmed: 33830956
Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1350-1363
pubmed: 32344456
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Aug;47:103188
pubmed: 34049775
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186567
pubmed: 30646335
Anaesthesia. 2021 Mar;76(3):312-319
pubmed: 33073371
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):522.e1-522.e11
pubmed: 34023315
Anaesthesia. 2020 Aug;75(8):1119-1120
pubmed: 32406526
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):510.e1-510.e12
pubmed: 33221292
Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1208-1210
pubmed: 27655279

Auteurs

K Bhatia (K)

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH