The Circle of Security Parenting Program (COS-P): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low Intensity, Individualized Attachment-Based Program With at-Risk Caregivers.

Circle of Security externalizing behaviors parenting reflective functioning stress

Journal

Behavior therapy
ISSN: 1878-1888
Titre abrégé: Behav Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1251640

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 10 02 2021
revised: 20 07 2021
accepted: 23 07 2021
entrez: 1 3 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P; Cooper et al., 2009) is a psychoeducational program for caregivers of young children that has been widely disseminated. The program is founded in attachment theory and relies on computer-delivered content and parent reflection and discussion to teach concepts of safety and security to promote better caregiver-child relationships and child wellbeing. The present study is a randomized controlled trial of COS-P, individually delivered to 85 Australian caregivers (51 COS-P, 34 waitlist control) who reported parenting distress and child disruptive behaviors. Caregivers completed a baseline assessment and repeated the assessment after completion of COS-P or 8 weeks on the waitlist. Caregivers completed surveys to report child symptoms, and parenting stress, anxious and avoidant attachment, reflective functioning, parenting practices, and depressive symptoms. No differences in COS-P vs. waitlist participants were found at baseline. Analyses of complete data (35 COS-P, 25-26 waitlist) revealed a greater decline in caregivers' attachment anxiety and negative parenting relative to waitlist, but only attachment anxiety in intent-to-treat analyses. Other improvements were found, but these extended to both the COS-P and waitlist conditions and did not differ between conditions. Overall, effects of COS-P were small and rarely significant, suggesting the need to consider alternative programs that have evidence of effectiveness when providing services to at-risk families.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35227399
pii: S0005-7894(21)00100-3
doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.07.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

208-223

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck (MJ)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland. Electronic address: m.zimmer-gembeck@griffith.edu.au.

Julia Rudolph (J)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology.

Elia-Jade Edwards (EJ)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology.

Kellie Swan (K)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland.

Shawna M Campbell (SM)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland.

Tanya Hawes (T)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology.

Haley J Webb (HJ)

Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH