Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis.
Bibliometric analysis
IONM
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
LA
Journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
08
10
2021
accepted:
07
02
2022
pubmed:
3
3
2022
medline:
9
11
2022
entrez:
2
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IOMM) has been used worldwide in the attempt to reduce postsurgical neurological deficits, however, most of the publications are from developed countries. There is a global bibliometric analysis of IOMN in spinal surgery, however, the contribution of Latin America (LA) is not mentioned. The aim of this study is to describe scientific productivity, patterns of publications, and thematic trends of IONM in LA. Data was collected using Scopus database, by searching scientific articles with LA affiliation, using 18 keywords. We excluded duplicates, not original articles, reviews, surveys, and articles not related to humans. Articles were analyzed and classified as follows: year of publication, language of the original document, journals metrics, country, IONM modality, etiology, location of surgery, medical specialties, and outcome. Descriptive statistics were used. We obtained 8,699 scientific articles of which 41 scientific articles from 7 LA countries were selected. Mexico has the highest number of publications. In most countries, supratentorial location showed the highest frequency. Somatosensory evoked potentials and electrocorticography were the most performed modalities. Neurosurgery was the most involved specialty of our 41 scientific articles, and 95.1% of these publications concluded that IONM is useful to guide surgical procedures. Mexico and Brazil have led IONM publications in LA. The lower reference in publications of visual evoked potentials and brainstem auditory evoked potentials IONM modalities, could be considered in the future to boost tailored research in LA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35235105
doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00831-3
pii: 10.1007/s10877-022-00831-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1827-1832Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Kim SM, Kim SH, Seo DW, Lee KW. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: Basic principles and recent update. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(9):1261–9. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1261 .
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1261
pubmed: 24015028
pmcid: 3763097
Nuwer MR. (2008) Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology. Overview and history. In: Intraoperative Monitoring of Neural Function. Elsevier, pp 2–6.
Nuwer MR, Emerson RG, Galloway G, Legatt AD, Lopez J, Minahan R, et al (2012) Evidence-based guideline update: Intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials. Neurology 78(8):585–589.
De La Maza-Krzeptowsky LC, Romero-Esquiliano G, Ramírez-Segura EH, De Obieta-Cruz E, Vega-Sosa A, Cárdenas-Mejía A, et al. Implementation of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in children and adults in secondary and tertiary health care facilities. Cir y Cir. 2018;86(2):132–9. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.M18000021 .
doi: 10.24875/CIRU.M18000021
Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: Does it make a difference? Spine. 2010;35:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8338e .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8338e
De la Maza Krzeptowsky LC, San-Juan D, Ximénez Camilli C, Alvarez Perera L, Valdez Ruvalcaba H, Morales Báez JA, et al. Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring in the Elderly. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;38(3):231–6.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000689
pubmed: 32141983
Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809–31.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
pubmed: 26594073
pmcid: 4643120
Rasolabadi M, Rasouli-Ghahfarkhi SM, Ardalan M, Kalhor MM, Seidi J, Gharib A. Epilepsy research in Iran: A scientometric analysis of publications output during 2000–2014. Acta Inf Med. 2015;23(6):374–8.
doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.374-378
Forero DA, Trujillo ML, González-Giraldo Y, Barreto GE. Scientific productivity in neurosciences in Latin America: a scientometrics perspective. Int J Neurosci. 2020;130(4):398–406.
doi: 10.1080/00207454.2019.1692837
pubmed: 31714811
Scopus [database online]. Updated August 8, 2021.
Kanmounye US, Robertson FC, Sebopelo LA, Senyuy WP, Sichimba D, Keke C, et al. Bibliometric Analysis of the 200 Most Cited Articles in WORLD NEUROSURGERY. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:226–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.121 .
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.121
pubmed: 33548539
Fonseca P, Goethel M, Vilas-Boas JP, Gutierres M, Correia MV. A (2021) Bibliometric Analysis of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery. World Neurosurg 154:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.039 .
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.039
pubmed: 34280542
Alva-Díaz C, Navarro-Flores A, Rivera-Torrejon O, Huerta-Rosario A, Molina RA, Velásquez-Rimachi V, et al. Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Epilepsia. 2021;62(4):984–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16850 .
doi: 10.1111/epi.16850
pubmed: 33651439
Vadivelu S, Sivaganesan A, Patel AJ, Agadi S, Schmidt RJ, Mani P, et al. Practice trends in the utilization of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery as a function of complication rate, and patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(3–4):617–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.010
pubmed: 24239735
Guiroy A, Valacco M, Gagliardi M, Cabrera JP, Emmerich J, Willhuber GC, et al. Barriers of neurophysiology monitoring in spine surgery: Latin America experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11(130):1–5. 10.25259/SNI_44_2020.
Grand View Research. (2017) Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Insource IONM, Outsource IONM), By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, MEA), And Segment Forecasts, 2018–2025. Grand View Research. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/intraoperative-neuromonitoring-market . Accessed 8 August 2021.
Cortés Doñate VE, Pérez Lorensu PJ, García García A, Asociación de Monitorización Intr AV. Sociedad Española de Neurofisiolog AV, Grupo de Trabajo de Monitorización AV (2018) Monitorización neurofisiológica intraoperatoria en España: inicios, situación actual y perspectivas de futuro. Rev Neurol 66(09):315–320. 10.33588/rn.6609.2018004.
PubMed [database online]. Bethesda MD: USA National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine. Updated August 8, 2021.
Ney JP, Van Der Goes DN, Watanabe JH. Cost-benefit analysis: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgeries. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30(3):280–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182933d8f .
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182933d8f
pubmed: 23733093