Online consultation in an orthopedic trauma surgery outpatient clinic: is there a learning curve?


Journal

BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 11 01 2022
accepted: 16 02 2022
entrez: 3 3 2022
pubmed: 4 3 2022
medline: 5 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the context of the German contact restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic of March 2020, an online-based consultation system was established in our university orthopedic outpatient department to maintain patient care. As a basis for contact-minimizing communication, this was continued after the contact restrictions were lifted. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess the effectiveness, technical feasibility, and patient flow in this system under lockdown conditions and in the period afterwards. The evaluation took place from the beginning of the first lockdown on March 13, 2020, until May 31, 2021. For each patient encounter, the quality of the sound and video connections was documented. The outcomes of the consultations were recorded. Four categories were distinguished: 1) no follow-up necessary, 2) follow-up via online consultation, 3) referral for surgical therapy, and 4) follow-up in the outpatient clinic for physical examination. A comparison was made between an early cohort right after implementation of the online consultation and and a late cohort after establishment of the consultation. There were 408 patient encounters via online consultation. A total of 360 (88%) consultations were uninterrupted. Initial presentations accounted for 124 (30%) consultations. In 75 (18%) patients, no further follow-up was necessary. Follow-up via online consultation was scheduled in 82 (20%) patients, direct referral for surgery was made in 86 (21%) patients, and a follow-up for physical examination was arranged in 165 (40%) patients. When comparing the early and late cohort, there was no difference in the duration of the conversation (p = 0.23). A significant difference was found in the type of further treatment. In the late cohort, conservative therapy was used more often (p < 0.01), resulting in a lower number of follow-up visits for clinical examination (p < 0.01). While a definite decision for further procedure was possible solely by online consultation in a large percentage of cases, 40% of patients still needed an additional in-person consultation for physical examination. A learning curve could be observed regarding the selection of patients suited for online consultation. Overall, online consultation is a useful measure to manage patient volume and to visibly support direct doctor-patient contact.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In the context of the German contact restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic of March 2020, an online-based consultation system was established in our university orthopedic outpatient department to maintain patient care. As a basis for contact-minimizing communication, this was continued after the contact restrictions were lifted. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess the effectiveness, technical feasibility, and patient flow in this system under lockdown conditions and in the period afterwards.
METHODS METHODS
The evaluation took place from the beginning of the first lockdown on March 13, 2020, until May 31, 2021. For each patient encounter, the quality of the sound and video connections was documented. The outcomes of the consultations were recorded. Four categories were distinguished: 1) no follow-up necessary, 2) follow-up via online consultation, 3) referral for surgical therapy, and 4) follow-up in the outpatient clinic for physical examination. A comparison was made between an early cohort right after implementation of the online consultation and and a late cohort after establishment of the consultation.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 408 patient encounters via online consultation. A total of 360 (88%) consultations were uninterrupted. Initial presentations accounted for 124 (30%) consultations. In 75 (18%) patients, no further follow-up was necessary. Follow-up via online consultation was scheduled in 82 (20%) patients, direct referral for surgery was made in 86 (21%) patients, and a follow-up for physical examination was arranged in 165 (40%) patients. When comparing the early and late cohort, there was no difference in the duration of the conversation (p = 0.23). A significant difference was found in the type of further treatment. In the late cohort, conservative therapy was used more often (p < 0.01), resulting in a lower number of follow-up visits for clinical examination (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
While a definite decision for further procedure was possible solely by online consultation in a large percentage of cases, 40% of patients still needed an additional in-person consultation for physical examination. A learning curve could be observed regarding the selection of patients suited for online consultation. Overall, online consultation is a useful measure to manage patient volume and to visibly support direct doctor-patient contact.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35236325
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05144-9
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05144-9
pmc: PMC8889387
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

196

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Feb;156(1):68-77
pubmed: 28837980
Orthopade. 2020 Jun;49(6):494-501
pubmed: 32436038
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;39(5):783-90
pubmed: 26169952
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Aug;95(8):1715-1731
pubmed: 32753146
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep;25(8):451-459
pubmed: 29973130
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jan 13;:
pubmed: 33439302
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902
pubmed: 29118053
Unfallchirurg. 2021 Jun 29;:
pubmed: 34189588
Z Orthop Unfall. 2021 Apr;159(2):202-208
pubmed: 33477179
BMC Surg. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):229
pubmed: 33028309
Z Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;79(10):1078-1085
pubmed: 33201305
Z Orthop Unfall. 2022 Feb;160(1):93-98
pubmed: 33233013
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 08;16:483
pubmed: 27608768
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Oct 24;9(11):e1673-e1681
pubmed: 33294325
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11:S704-S710
pubmed: 32837105

Auteurs

Pierre Hepp (P)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Georg Osterhoff (G)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Peter Melcher (P)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Ralf Henkelmann (R)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Jan Theopold (J)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany. jan.theopold@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH