Comparison of Outcomes and Process of Care for Patients Treated at Hospitals Dedicated for COVID-19 Care vs Other Hospitals.
Aged
COVID-19
/ complications
Cohort Studies
Female
Hospital Mortality
Hospitalization
Hospitals, Special
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minnesota
/ epidemiology
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Propensity Score
Quality of Health Care
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2022
01 03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
3
3
2022
pubmed:
4
3
2022
medline:
12
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the M Health Fairview Hospital System established dedicated hospitals for establishing cohorts and caring for patients with COVID-19, yet the association between treatment at COVID-19-dedicated hospitals and mortality and complications is not known. To analyze the mortality rate and complications associated with treatment at the COVID-19-dedicated hospitals. This retrospective cohort study evaluated data prospectively collected from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, from 11 hospitals in Minnesota, including 2 hospitals created solely to care for patients with COVID-19. Data obtained included demographic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of interest for all patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to this hospital system during the study period. Patients were grouped based on whether they received treatment from 1 of the 2 COVID-19-dedicated hospitals compared with the remainder of the hospitals within the hospital system. Multivariate analyses, including risk-adjusted logistic regression and propensity score matching, were performed to evaluate the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes, including complications and use of COVID-specific therapeutics. There were 5504 patients with COVID-19 admitted during the study period (median age, 62.5 [IQR, 45.0-75.6] years; 2854 women [51.9%]). Of these, 2077 patients (37.7%) (median age, 63.4 [IQR, 50.7-76.1] years; 1080 men [52.0%]) were treated at 1 of the 2 COVID-19-dedicated hospitals compared with 3427 (62.3%; median age, 62.0 [40.0-75.1] years; 1857 women (54.2%) treated at other hospitals. The mortality rate was 11.6% (n = 241) at the dedicated hospitals compared with 8.0% (n = 274) at the other hospitals (P < .001). However, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly lower for patients in the COVID-19-dedicated hospitals in both the unmatched group (n = 2077; odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95) and the propensity score-matched group (n = 1317; OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99). The rate of overall complications in the propensity score-matched group was significantly lower (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99) and the use of COVID-19-specific therapeutics including deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (83.9% vs 56.9%; P < .001), high-dose corticosteroids (56.1% vs 22.2%; P < .001), remdesivir (61.5% vs 44.5%; P < .001), and tocilizumab (7.9% vs 2.0; P < .001) was significantly higher. In this cohort study, COVID-19-dedicated hospitals had multiple benefits, including providing high-volume repetitive treatment and isolating patients with the infection. This experience suggests improved in-hospital mortality for patients treated at dedicated hospitals owing to improved processes of care and supports the use of establishing cohorts for future pandemics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35238935
pii: 2789581
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0873
pmc: PMC8895262
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e220873Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002494
Pays : United States
Références
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218828
pubmed: 33938933
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216556
pubmed: 33830226
JAMA. 2001 Mar 7;285(9):1164-71
pubmed: 11231745
J Prev Med Hyg. 2018 Dec 15;59(4):E323-E327
pubmed: 30656236
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2020 Jun 19;27(2):201-206
pubmed: 32588593
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 03;18:100212
pubmed: 31922117
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):602
pubmed: 34167463
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):297-308
pubmed: 30657714
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393
pubmed: 19564179
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):41-50
pubmed: 16822995
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 23;:
pubmed: 34569998
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 24;8(1):1124
pubmed: 29066781
One Health. 2020 May 05;10:100137
pubmed: 32373705
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
Am J Disaster Med. 2021 Winter;16(1):35-41
pubmed: 33954973
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;166:108293
pubmed: 32623035
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029058
pubmed: 33301018
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;31(25):3141-6
pubmed: 23897962
Emerg Infect Dis. 1995 Jan-Mar;1(1):7-15
pubmed: 8903148
An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Mar-Apr;89(2):205-18
pubmed: 24770495
Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):509-14
pubmed: 12677147
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Nov;21(9):729-731
pubmed: 32697625