Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes From a 14-Country Cohort of Patients With Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Treated Concomitantly With Bedaquiline, Delamanid, and Other Second-Line Drugs.
Antitubercular Agents
/ adverse effects
Clofazimine
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Diarylquinolines
/ adverse effects
Electrolytes
/ therapeutic use
Fluoroquinolones
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Linezolid
/ therapeutic use
Nitroimidazoles
Oxazoles
Prospective Studies
Rifampin
/ therapeutic use
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
/ drug therapy
adverse events
combination therapy
endTB
linezolid
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 10 2022
12 10 2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
pubmed:
5
3
2022
medline:
15
10
2022
entrez:
4
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Concomitant use of bedaquiline (Bdq) and delamanid (Dlm) for multi-drug/rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) has raised concerns about a potentially poor risk-benefit ratio. Yet this combination is an important alternative for patients infected with strains of TB with complex drug resistance profiles or who cannot tolerate other therapies. We assessed safety and treatment outcomes of MDR/RR-TB patients receiving concomitant Bdq and Dlm, along with other second-line anti-TB drugs. We conducted a multi-centric, prospective observational cohort study across 14 countries among patients receiving concomitant Bdq-Dlm treatment. Patients were recruited between April 2015 and September 2018 and were followed until the end of treatment. All serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AESI), leading to a treatment change, or judged significant by a clinician, were systematically monitored and documented. Overall, 472 patients received Bdq and Dlm concomitantly. A large majority also received linezolid (89.6%) and clofazimine (84.5%). Nearly all (90.3%) had extensive disease; most (74.2%) had resistance to fluoroquinolones. The most common AESI were peripheral neuropathy (134, 28.4%) and electrolyte depletion (94, 19.9%). Acute kidney injury and myelosuppression were seen in 40 (8.5%) and 24 (5.1%) of patients, respectively. QT prolongation occurred in 7 patients (1.5%). Overall, 78.0% (358/458) had successful treatment outcomes, 8.9% died, and 7.2% experienced treatment failure. Concomitant use of Bdq and Dlm, along with linezolid and clofazimine, is safe and effective for MDR/RR-TB patients with extensive disease. Using these drugs concomitantly is a good therapeutic option for patients with resistance to many anti-TB drugs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Concomitant use of bedaquiline (Bdq) and delamanid (Dlm) for multi-drug/rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) has raised concerns about a potentially poor risk-benefit ratio. Yet this combination is an important alternative for patients infected with strains of TB with complex drug resistance profiles or who cannot tolerate other therapies. We assessed safety and treatment outcomes of MDR/RR-TB patients receiving concomitant Bdq and Dlm, along with other second-line anti-TB drugs.
METHODS
We conducted a multi-centric, prospective observational cohort study across 14 countries among patients receiving concomitant Bdq-Dlm treatment. Patients were recruited between April 2015 and September 2018 and were followed until the end of treatment. All serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AESI), leading to a treatment change, or judged significant by a clinician, were systematically monitored and documented.
RESULTS
Overall, 472 patients received Bdq and Dlm concomitantly. A large majority also received linezolid (89.6%) and clofazimine (84.5%). Nearly all (90.3%) had extensive disease; most (74.2%) had resistance to fluoroquinolones. The most common AESI were peripheral neuropathy (134, 28.4%) and electrolyte depletion (94, 19.9%). Acute kidney injury and myelosuppression were seen in 40 (8.5%) and 24 (5.1%) of patients, respectively. QT prolongation occurred in 7 patients (1.5%). Overall, 78.0% (358/458) had successful treatment outcomes, 8.9% died, and 7.2% experienced treatment failure.
CONCLUSIONS
Concomitant use of Bdq and Dlm, along with linezolid and clofazimine, is safe and effective for MDR/RR-TB patients with extensive disease. Using these drugs concomitantly is a good therapeutic option for patients with resistance to many anti-TB drugs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35243494
pii: 6542212
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac176
pmc: PMC9555840
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Diarylquinolines
0
Electrolytes
0
Fluoroquinolones
0
Nitroimidazoles
0
OPC-67683
0
Oxazoles
0
bedaquiline
78846I289Y
Clofazimine
D959AE5USF
Linezolid
ISQ9I6J12J
Rifampin
VJT6J7R4TR
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1307-1314Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Potential conflicts of interest. Bedaquiline donations made from Janssen to the Global Drug Facility were used for patients in the endTB observational study. Donations of delamanid from Otsuka were used for initial patients enrolled in the endTB Observational Study. The companies from which drug donations were received did not have any role on the study design, data analyses, data interpretation or manuscript writing. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Références
Respir Med. 2020 Jun;167:105956
pubmed: 32421540
Eur Respir J. 2021 Mar 4;57(3):
pubmed: 33093123
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 29;75(6):1006-1013
pubmed: 35028659
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):470
pubmed: 31034392
Eur Respir J. 2018 Mar 22;51(3):
pubmed: 29545276
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Oct 1;24(10):1081-1086
pubmed: 33126943
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jan 16;55(1):
pubmed: 31619478
Eur Respir J. 2018 Mar 22;51(3):
pubmed: 29419439
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):975-983
pubmed: 33587897
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 May;18(5):536-544
pubmed: 29452942
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 10;53(1):
pubmed: 30361253
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):383-394
pubmed: 32192585
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):111-119
pubmed: 32706644
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902
pubmed: 32130813
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Mar;7(3):249-259
pubmed: 30630778
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):733
pubmed: 31429722
Indian J Tuberc. 2019 Jan;66(1):184-188
pubmed: 30878066
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Oct 1;24(10):1087-1094
pubmed: 33126944
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3496-e3504
pubmed: 33079176
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Sep;7(9):820-826
pubmed: 31486393