Third-trimester ultrasound for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: results from the ADoPAD study.
Cesarean section
diagnosis
low-lying placenta
placenta accreta spectrum
placenta previa
ultrasound
Journal
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN: 1469-0705
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9108340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
27
01
2022
received:
12
10
2021
accepted:
05
03
2022
pubmed:
6
3
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
5
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa. This was a prospective multicenter study of pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with low-lying placenta (< 20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the internal cervical os) on ultrasound at ≥ 26 + 0 weeks' gestation, between October 2014 and January 2019. Ultrasound suspicion of PAS was raised in the presence of at least one of these signs on grayscale ultrasound: (1) obliteration of the hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta; (2) interruption of the hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and the bladder wall; (3) abnormal placental lacunae. Histopathological examinations were performed according to a predefined protocol, with pathologists blinded to the ultrasound findings. To assess the ability of ultrasound to detect clinically significant PAS, a composite outcome comprising the need for active management at delivery and histopathological confirmation of PAS was considered the reference standard. PAS was considered to be clinically significant if, in addition to histological confirmation, at least one of these procedures was carried out after delivery: use of hemostatic intrauterine balloon, compressive uterine suture, peripartum hysterectomy, uterine/hypogastric artery ligation or uterine artery embolization. The diagnostic performance of each ultrasound sign for clinically significant PAS was evaluated in all women and in the subgroup who had at least one previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. Post-test probability was assessed using Fagan nomograms. A total of 568 women underwent transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound examinations during the study period. Of these, 95 delivered in local hospitals, and placental pathology according to the study protocol was therefore not available. Among the 473 women for whom placental pathology was available, clinically significant PAS was diagnosed in 99 (21%), comprising 36 cases of placenta accreta, 19 of placenta increta and 44 of placenta percreta. The median gestational age at the time of ultrasound assessment was 31.4 (interquartile range, 28.6-34.4) weeks. A normal hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 5% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 9% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. The absence of placental lacunae reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 9% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 36% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When abnormal placental lacunae were seen on ultrasound, the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 59% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 78% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. An interrupted hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and bladder wall increased the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS from 21% to 85% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa and from 62% to 88% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When all three sonographic markers were present, the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 89% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 92% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. Grayscale ultrasound has good diagnostic performance to identify pregnancies at low risk of PAS in a high-risk population of women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa. Ultrasound may be safely used to guide management decisions and concentrate resources on patients with higher risk of clinically significant PAS. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35247287
doi: 10.1002/uog.24889
pmc: PMC9544821
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
381-389Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Références
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):274-280
pubmed: 29405319
Mod Pathol. 2020 Dec;33(12):2382-2396
pubmed: 32415266
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Nov;31(11):1062-5
pubmed: 21800335
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1226-32
pubmed: 16738145
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;42(5):509-17
pubmed: 23943408
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;18(2):103-8
pubmed: 11529987
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):331-337
pubmed: 21309195
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):302-7
pubmed: 25964123
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):559-563
pubmed: 28120421
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):27-36
pubmed: 28268196
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):406-12
pubmed: 23288834
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):271-5
pubmed: 26205041
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e031193
pubmed: 31722942
N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):257
pubmed: 1143310
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):304-309
pubmed: 29660186
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):645-653
pubmed: 26214694
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519