Using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey to Measure Morbidity After Cranial Neurosurgery.


Journal

Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
ISSN: 1537-1921
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8910749

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 22 09 2020
accepted: 14 12 2020
entrez: 7 3 2022
pubmed: 8 3 2022
medline: 11 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The incidence of morbidity after cranial neurosurgery is significant, reported in up to a quarter of patients depending on methodology used. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) is a reliable method for identifying clinically relevant postsurgical morbidity using 9 organ system domains. The primary aim of this study was to quantify early morbidity after cranial neurosurgery using POMS. The secondary aims were to identify non-POMS-defined morbidity and association of POMS with postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). A retrospective electronic health care record review was conducted for all patients who underwent elective or expedited major cranial surgery over a 3-month period. Postsurgical morbidity was quantified on postoperative days (D) 1, 3, 5, 8, and 15 using POMS. A Poisson regression model was used to test the correlation between LOS and total POMS scores on D1, 3 and 5. A further regression model was used to test the association of LOS with specific POMS domains. A total of 246 patients were included. POMS-defined morbidity was 40%, 30%, and 33% on D1, D3, and D8, respectively. The presence of POMS morbidity on these days was associated with longer median (range) LOS: D1 6 (1 to 49) versus 4 (2 to 45) days; D3 8 (4 to 89) versus 6 (4 to 35) days; D5 14 (5 to 49) versus 8.5 (6 to 32) days; D8 18 (9 to 49) versus 12.5 (9 to 32) days (P<0.05). Total POMS score correlated with overall LOS on D1 (P<0.001), D3 (P<0.001), and D5 (P<0.001). A positive response to the "infectious" (D1, 3), "pulmonary" (D1), and "renal" POMS items (D1) were associated with longer LOS. Although our data suggests that POMS is a useful tool for measuring morbidity after cranial neurosurgery, some important morbidity items that impact on LOS are missed. A neurosurgery specific tool would be of value.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The incidence of morbidity after cranial neurosurgery is significant, reported in up to a quarter of patients depending on methodology used. The Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) is a reliable method for identifying clinically relevant postsurgical morbidity using 9 organ system domains. The primary aim of this study was to quantify early morbidity after cranial neurosurgery using POMS. The secondary aims were to identify non-POMS-defined morbidity and association of POMS with postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A retrospective electronic health care record review was conducted for all patients who underwent elective or expedited major cranial surgery over a 3-month period. Postsurgical morbidity was quantified on postoperative days (D) 1, 3, 5, 8, and 15 using POMS. A Poisson regression model was used to test the correlation between LOS and total POMS scores on D1, 3 and 5. A further regression model was used to test the association of LOS with specific POMS domains.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 246 patients were included. POMS-defined morbidity was 40%, 30%, and 33% on D1, D3, and D8, respectively. The presence of POMS morbidity on these days was associated with longer median (range) LOS: D1 6 (1 to 49) versus 4 (2 to 45) days; D3 8 (4 to 89) versus 6 (4 to 35) days; D5 14 (5 to 49) versus 8.5 (6 to 32) days; D8 18 (9 to 49) versus 12.5 (9 to 32) days (P<0.05). Total POMS score correlated with overall LOS on D1 (P<0.001), D3 (P<0.001), and D5 (P<0.001). A positive response to the "infectious" (D1, 3), "pulmonary" (D1), and "renal" POMS items (D1) were associated with longer LOS.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Although our data suggests that POMS is a useful tool for measuring morbidity after cranial neurosurgery, some important morbidity items that impact on LOS are missed. A neurosurgery specific tool would be of value.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35255015
doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000756
pii: 00008506-202204000-00008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

201-208

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

L.D. is supported by an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship and was the recipient of a research fellowship sponsored by B. Braun. A.K.T. research time was supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. M.S. is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology: this manuscript was handled by Dr. Alana Flexman, Associate Editor. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Références

Gozal YM, Akture E, Ravindra VM, et al. Defining a new neurosurgical complication classification: lessons learned from a monthly Morbidity and Mortality Conference. J Neurosurg. 2020;132:272–276 10.3171/2018.9.JNS181004
doi: 10.3171/2018.9.JNS181004
Schiavolin S, Broggi M, Acerbi F, et al. The impact of neurosurgical complications on patients’ health status: a comparison between different grades of complications. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:36–40 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.008
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.008
Rolston JD, Han SJ, Lau CY, et al. Frequency and predictors of complications in neurological surgery: national trends from 2006 to 2011. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:736–745 10.3171/2013.10.JNS122419
doi: 10.3171/2013.10.JNS122419
Rock AK, Opalak CF, Workman KG, et al. Safety outcomes following spine and cranial neurosurgery: evidence from the national surgical quality improvement program. J Neurosurgl Anesthesiol. 2018;30:328–336 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000474
doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000474
Alexandre V, Guyonaud C, Frasca D, et al. Major complications after scheduled craniotomy: a justification for systematic postoperative intensive care admission? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37:147–149 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001045
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001045
Viken HH, Iversen IA, Jakola A, et al. When are complications after brain tumour surgery detected? World Neurosurg. 2018;112:e702–e710 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.137
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.137
Reponen E, Tuominen H, Korja M. Quality of British and American Nationwide Quality of Care and Patient Safety Benchmarking Programs: case neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2019;85:500–507 10.1093/neuros/nyy380
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy380
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Patel ABU, Reyes A, Ackland GL. Non-inferiority of retrospective data collection for assessing perioperative morbidity. Peer J. 2015;3:e1466 10.7717/peerj.1466
doi: 10.7717/peerj.1466
Bennett-Guerrero E, Welsby I, Dunn TJ, et al. The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:514–519 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00050
doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00050
Grocott MPW, Browne JP, Van der Meulen J, et al. The post-operative morbidity survey was validated and used to describe morbidity after major surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:919–928 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.003
Sanders J, Keogh BE, Van der Meulen J, et al. The development of a postoperative morbidity score to assess total morbidity burden after cardiac surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:423–433 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.004
Marufu TC, Elphick HL, Ahmed FB, et al. Short-term morbidity factors associated with length of hospital stay (LOS): development and validation of a Hip Fracture specific postoperative morbidity survey (HF-POMS). Injury. 2019;50:931–938 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.009
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.009
Stubbs DJ, Bowen JL, Furness RC, et al. Development and validation of an electronic postoperative morbidity score. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:935–942 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003953
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003953
D’Antona L, Blamey SC, Craven CL, et al. Early postoperative outcomes of normal pressure hydrocephalus: results of a service evaluation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019. [Epub ahead of print] 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000668
doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000668
Stubbs DJ, Davies BM, Bashford T, et al. Identification of factors associated with morbidity and postoperative length of stay in surgically managed chronic subdural haematoma using electronic health records: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e037385 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037385
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037385
Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme. Available at: https://pqip.org.uk/content/home . Accessed December 12, 2020.
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. 2004. Available at: https://www.ncepod.org.uk/classification.html . Accessed December 12, 2020.
AXA PPP schedule of procedures. 2020. Available at: https://provider.axappphealthcare.co.uk/schedule-of-procedures-and-fees/ . Accessed December 12, 2020.
Protopapa KL, Simpson JC, Smith NCE, et al. Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). Br J Surg. 2014;101:1774–1783 10.1002/bjs.9638
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9638
Davies J, Whitlock J, Gutmanis I, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the retrospectively assigned clinical frailty scale score in a geriatric outreach population. Can Geriatr J. 2018;21:1–5 10.5770/cgj.21.263
doi: 10.5770/cgj.21.263
Muñoz M, Acheson AG, Auerbach M, et al. International consensus statement on the peri-operative management of anaemia and iron deficiency. Anaesthesia. 2017;72:233–247 10.1111/anae.13773
doi: 10.1111/anae.13773
KDIGO Acute Kidney Injury definition and guidelines. 2012. Available at: https://kdigo.org/guidelines/acute-kidney-injury/ . Accessed December 12, 2020.
The Society of British Neurological Surgeons National Audit Programme. 2013. Available at: https://www.sbns.org.uk/index.php/audit/ . Accessed December 12, 2020.

Auteurs

Astri M V Luoma (AMV)

Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Deborah R Douglas (DR)

Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Linda D'Antona (L)

Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust.
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Ahmed K Toma (AK)

Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust.
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Martin Smith (M)

Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH