Characterizing the neurocognitive profiles of children with moyamoya disease using the Das Naglieri cognitive assessment system.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 03 2022
07 03 2022
Historique:
received:
16
09
2021
accepted:
23
02
2022
entrez:
8
3
2022
pubmed:
9
3
2022
medline:
15
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although cognitive impairment is well-documented in children with moyamoya disease (MMD), selective decline in specific neurocognitive domains remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to characterize the neurocognitive profile of children with MMD using the Das Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). We analyzed the neurocognitive data of 30 children (median age, 7 years) with MMD who were assessed with the CAS and the WISC-IV before surgery. We focused on the comparison of standard scores and intraindividual differences across domains. The CAS scores significantly varied across four measures (standard scores, p < 0.001; intraindividual differences, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses revealed that the standard scores and intraindividual differences for successive processing were significantly lower than those for planning and attention. The WISC-IV scores did not significantly vary among the four measures, although the working memory index was the lowest among the four measures. The within-individual weakness in successive processing, a form of working memory function, may be a distinct characteristic of children with MMD. The CAS may be more sensitive than the WISC-IV for detecting this selective neurocognitive weakness in children with MMD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35256691
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07699-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-07699-y
pmc: PMC8901907
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3638Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(3):199-203
pubmed: 25739435
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(5):245-66
pubmed: 22870528
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(10):1043-53; discussion 1052-3
pubmed: 9856248
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Dec;12(6):626-32
pubmed: 24138143
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 19;360(12):1226-37
pubmed: 19297575
Stroke. 1983 Jan-Feb;14(1):104-9
pubmed: 6823678
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1997 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S147-50
pubmed: 9409426
Childs Nerv Syst. 1990 May;6(3):166-71
pubmed: 2357714
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Oct 11;:1-7
pubmed: 31604320
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1445-53
pubmed: 8941956
Childs Nerv Syst. 2014 Mar;30(3):441-7
pubmed: 24005800
J Neurosurg. 2010 Oct;113(4):753-9
pubmed: 20469988
J Stroke. 2018 Sep;20(3):332-341
pubmed: 30309228
J Neurosurg. 1992 Jul;77(1):84-9
pubmed: 1607976
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(3):230-7
pubmed: 21178347
Childs Nerv Syst. 1995 Oct;11(10):584-90
pubmed: 8556725
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):1056-66
pubmed: 18940695
Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Jun;34(6):1199-1206
pubmed: 29679197
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Jun 15;58(6):240-246
pubmed: 29780072
J Neurosurg. 2020 Mar 13;134(3):940-945
pubmed: 32168484
Stroke. 1984 Sep-Oct;15(5):873-7
pubmed: 6474539
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1997 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S156-61
pubmed: 9409428
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Aug;23(7):1789-94
pubmed: 24957308
Neurosurg Focus. 1998 Nov 15;5(5):e5
pubmed: 17112208
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(5):318-26
pubmed: 22688069
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Sep;8(3):303-9
pubmed: 21882923