Duration of use and outcomes among people with opioid use disorder initiating methadone and buprenorphine in Ontario: a population-based propensity-score matched cohort study.
Analgesics, Opioid
/ therapeutic use
Buprenorphine
/ therapeutic use
Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination
/ therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Drug Overdose
/ drug therapy
Humans
Methadone
/ therapeutic use
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Opiate Overdose
Opiate Substitution Treatment
Opioid-Related Disorders
/ therapy
Drug discontinuation | Health Services Research | opioid agonist therapy
opioid use disorder
overdose | persistence
Journal
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0443
Titre abrégé: Addiction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9304118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2021
accepted:
20
02
2022
pubmed:
9
3
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
entrez:
8
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize comparative risks and benefits of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone in a contemporary cohort where the unregulated drug supply is dominated by fentanyl. Population-based propensity-score matched cohort study conducted in Ontario, Canada among people aged 18+ initiating opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for an opioid use disorder between October 2016 and December 2018 (n = 18 880). Initiation of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone. The primary outcome was opioid overdose (fatal and non-fatal) while on treatment, with secondary outcomes including opioid overdose (first 30 days of treatment), treatment discontinuation, health-care interactions related to treatment of opioid use disorder, receiving a weekly supply of take-home doses and opioid overdose within 30 days of treatment discontinuation. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year. Overall, 7517 people initiating buprenorphine were matched to an equal number of methadone-treated individuals. Risk of opioid overdose while on treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.68] or within the first 30 days of treatment (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.85) was lower among buprenorphine recipients compared to methadone recipients. In secondary analyses, people initiating buprenorphine had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation within the first year (median time to discontinuation 104 versus 265 days, HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.37-1.49), had lower rates of health-care interactions for OUD (186.4 versus 254.3 per person-year; rate ratio = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.72-0.75), and a higher rate of receiving weekly take-home doses (HR = 2.33; 95% CI = 2.20-2.46). Overdose rates in the period following OAT discontinuation were higher than those observed while on treatment, but did not differ significantly by OAT type. Although treatment retention is higher among methadone recipients, overdose risk is also elevated compared to buprenorphine recipients. These findings demonstrate the benefits of any OAT on avoidance of overdose, particularly following treatment discontinuation and with the increasingly unpredictable drug supply in North America.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35257434
doi: 10.1111/add.15862
pmc: PMC9313829
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination
0
Buprenorphine
40D3SCR4GZ
Methadone
UC6VBE7V1Z
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1972-1981Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.
Références
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920622
pubmed: 32022884
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1461-1476
pubmed: 29672985
Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):1972-1981
pubmed: 35257434
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1610-1618
pubmed: 34159547
Healthc Q. 2019 Oct;22(3):6-11
pubmed: 31845850
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 2;18(1):316
pubmed: 29720153
BMJ. 2017 Apr 26;357:j1550
pubmed: 28446428
Can Respir J. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):183-8
pubmed: 20011725
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107672
pubmed: 31706251
BMJ. 2020 Mar 31;368:m772
pubmed: 32234712
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):412-26
pubmed: 25364994
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21748
pubmed: 21738786
COPD. 2009 Oct;6(5):388-94
pubmed: 19863368
Can Fam Physician. 2019 May;65(5):321-330
pubmed: 31088869
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):979-993
pubmed: 34076676
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 May;100:18-28
pubmed: 30898324
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Mar 1;160:112-8
pubmed: 26796596
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 12;70(6):202-207
pubmed: 33571180
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Jun;38(6):234-243
pubmed: 29911819
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69
pubmed: 24123228
BMJ Open. 2015 May 29;5(5):e007629
pubmed: 26024998
CMAJ. 2009 Dec 8;181(12):891-6
pubmed: 19969578
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):901-8
pubmed: 26384619
BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):960-2
pubmed: 15845982
Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3139-3152
pubmed: 33979008
Addiction. 2021 Jan;116(1):83-93
pubmed: 32428276
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232086
pubmed: 32407321
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;22(5):424-33
pubmed: 25069011
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
J Addict Med. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;15(6):454-460
pubmed: 33323695
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Dec;119:108146
pubmed: 33138929