Efficacy and safety of CD24Fc in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Journal
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
ISSN: 1474-4457
Titre abrégé: Lancet Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
12
11
2021
revised:
12
01
2022
accepted:
24
01
2022
pubmed:
15
3
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
14
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Non-antiviral therapeutic options are required for the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. CD24Fc is an immunomodulator with potential to reduce the exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD24Fc in hospitalised adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen support. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study at nine medical centres in the USA. Hospitalised patients (age ≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving oxygen support and standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) by site-stratified block randomisation to receive a single intravenous infusion of CD24Fc 480 mg or placebo. The study funder, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement over 28 days, defined as time that elapsed between a baseline National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale score of 2-4 and reaching a score of 5 or higher or hospital discharge. The prespecified primary interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04317040. Between April 24 and Sept 22, 2020, 243 hospitalised patients were assessed for eligibility and 234 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CD24Fc (n=116) or placebo (n=118). The prespecified interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint among 197 randomised participants. In the interim analysis, the 28-day clinical improvement rate was 82% (81 of 99) for CD24Fc versus 66% (65 of 98) for placebo; median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-8·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·0 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·16-2·23; log-rank p=0·0028, which crossed the prespecified efficacy boundary [α=0·0147]). 37 participants were randomly assigned after the interim analysis data cutoff date; among the 234 randomised participants, median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-9·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·5 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; log-rank p=0·037). The proportion of participants with disease progression within 28 days was 19% (22 of 116) in the CD24Fc group versus 31% (36 of 118) in the placebo group (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·33-0·95; unadjusted p=0·031). The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. No treatment-related adverse events were observed. CD24Fc is generally well tolerated and accelerates clinical improvement of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who are receiving oxygen support. These data suggest that targeting inflammation in response to tissue injuries might provide a therapeutic option for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Merck & Co, National Cancer Institute, OncoImmune.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Non-antiviral therapeutic options are required for the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. CD24Fc is an immunomodulator with potential to reduce the exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD24Fc in hospitalised adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen support.
METHODS
We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study at nine medical centres in the USA. Hospitalised patients (age ≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving oxygen support and standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) by site-stratified block randomisation to receive a single intravenous infusion of CD24Fc 480 mg or placebo. The study funder, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement over 28 days, defined as time that elapsed between a baseline National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale score of 2-4 and reaching a score of 5 or higher or hospital discharge. The prespecified primary interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04317040.
FINDINGS
Between April 24 and Sept 22, 2020, 243 hospitalised patients were assessed for eligibility and 234 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CD24Fc (n=116) or placebo (n=118). The prespecified interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint among 197 randomised participants. In the interim analysis, the 28-day clinical improvement rate was 82% (81 of 99) for CD24Fc versus 66% (65 of 98) for placebo; median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-8·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·0 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·16-2·23; log-rank p=0·0028, which crossed the prespecified efficacy boundary [α=0·0147]). 37 participants were randomly assigned after the interim analysis data cutoff date; among the 234 randomised participants, median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-9·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·5 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; log-rank p=0·037). The proportion of participants with disease progression within 28 days was 19% (22 of 116) in the CD24Fc group versus 31% (36 of 118) in the placebo group (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·33-0·95; unadjusted p=0·031). The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.
INTERPRETATION
CD24Fc is generally well tolerated and accelerates clinical improvement of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who are receiving oxygen support. These data suggest that targeting inflammation in response to tissue injuries might provide a therapeutic option for patients hospitalised with COVID-19.
FUNDING
Merck & Co, National Cancer Institute, OncoImmune.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35286843
pii: S1473-3099(22)00058-5
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00058-5
pmc: PMC8916779
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunologic Factors
0
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04317040']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
611-621Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016058
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R44 CA246991
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Pan Zheng
(P)
Yang Liu
(Y)
Martin Devenport
(M)
Raymond Touomou
(R)
Hung-Yen Chou
(HY)
Jai Thakor
(J)
Imaan Khan
(I)
Nicole Do
(N)
Josephine Faragalla
(J)
Andrea Hook
(A)
Sarah Kern
(S)
Janira V Ramos
(JV)
Jason Ward
(J)
Jamie Chen
(J)
John Higson
(J)
Meena Dam
(M)
Dawn Serkin
(D)
Pooja Karloopia
(P)
Wendy Moore
(W)
Mark Scofield
(M)
David Jeffery Childers
(DJ)
Jeffrey S Cantrell
(JS)
Millie Corgan
(M)
Ella Li
(E)
Jian Chen
(J)
Xiang Zhou
(X)
Jing Liu
(J)
Denise Redvers-Higgins
(D)
Hua Han
(H)
Jiyun Hou
(J)
Yudi Pan
(Y)
Karyn Tucker
(K)
Xiaoyan Zhang
(X)
Shyamasundaran Kottilil
(S)
Joel V Chua
(JV)
Jennifer Husson
(J)
Shivakumar Narayanan
(S)
Jaqueline Bran
(J)
Ka Wing Joyce Lam
(KWJ)
Alicia Jeffrey
(A)
Olivia K Giddings
(OK)
Jennie Pexa
(J)
Mario Becerra
(M)
James Welker
(J)
Kathleen W Gray
(KW)
Nicole Richmond
(N)
Chukwuemeka Nzelibe
(C)
Carlos D Malvestutto
(CD)
Susan Koletar
(S)
Mahdee Sobhanie
(M)
Jan Clark
(J)
Zihai Li
(Z)
Kelsi Reynolds
(K)
Karthik Chakravarthy
(K)
Kevin Weller
(K)
Mohamed Yusuf
(M)
Jennifer Severing
(J)
Kelley Barley
(K)
Juan D Pulido
(JD)
Jennifer C Fulton
(JC)
William Gil
(W)
M D Jeanine
(MD)
Richmond R N
(R)
Sandy Jones
(S)
Kristina Clemmer
(K)
Dana Byrne
(D)
Lisa Pedroza
(L)
Emily Nicole Davidson
(EN)
Amanda Logan
(A)
Katie Grant
(K)
Eric D Whitman
(ED)
Jason Kessler
(J)
Robert Roland
(R)
Rosemary Stefiniw
(R)
Molly Maurer
(M)
Salome Geene
(S)
Christopher F Buck
(CF)
Debra Connolly
(D)
Patrice Light
(P)
Sunanda Baviskar
(S)
Yee Won Low
(YW)
Kyra Michalski
(K)
Pamela Giordano
(P)
Jennifer Chao
(J)
Michelle Williams
(M)
Amulya Makkapati
(A)
Andrew T Catanzaro
(AT)
Jonathan B Cohen
(JB)
Mehad Musbah
(M)
Pramila Jaladanki
(P)
Ying Yuan
(Y)
Shilpa Rele
(S)
Desirae Stewart
(D)
Starlet Lewis
(S)
Ian Sankar
(I)
Nabulungi Kasumba
(N)
Kaylia Biney
(K)
Elham Hekmat
(E)
Jordan E Lake
(JE)
Bindu Akkanti
(B)
Melissa J Reimer-McAtee
(MJ)
Marisel Negret Hernandez
(M)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests JW, JDP, ATC, CDM, EDW, DB, OKG, JEL, and SK had clinical trial agreements with OncoImmune. JDP reports payment for Baptist Medical Health COVID update (CME event). EDW was on the speaker's bureau at Merck & Co (before Merck's acquisition of OncoImmune). JEL is a consultant to Merck & Co for HIV-related studies. SK reports a grant from OncoImmune, during the conduct of the study; and grants from Merck & Co, Gilead Sciences, and Arbutus Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. ZL serves as a scientific advisory board member for Alphamab, Hengenix, and Ikonisys; and receives grants from Heat Biologics, National Institutes of Health, and Pelotonia, outside of the submitted work. EL, JiC, and XZ are employees of Edetek, the clinical data management and biostats service provider for OncoImmune. DB, DG, and AK are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, and could hold stocks or stock options in Merck & Co. H-YC, MD, RT, YL, and PZ are employees of OncoImmune, and received grants from National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute (R44CA246991-02S1), during the conduct of the study. MD, YL, and PZ have a patent or a patent pending. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1491-1502
pubmed: 33631065
JCI Insight. 2017 Jul 20;2(14):
pubmed: 28724800
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):5
pubmed: 35012610
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Aug;41(8):531-543
pubmed: 32580895
Antiviral Res. 2018 Sep;157:9-17
pubmed: 29983395
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):363-374
pubmed: 32346093
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511
pubmed: 33264556
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1048-1057
pubmed: 32821939
Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Aug;17(8):887-888
pubmed: 32382131
Clin Trials. 2008;5(1):5-13
pubmed: 18283074
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1827-1837
pubmed: 32459919
Blood. 2014 May 29;123(22):3512-23
pubmed: 24695850
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2451-2460
pubmed: 32412710
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):795-807
pubmed: 33306283
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2333-2344
pubmed: 33085857
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):522-532
pubmed: 33676590
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jul;20(7):389-391
pubmed: 32439870
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 May;20(5):269-270
pubmed: 32273594
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 07;6(12):e05672
pubmed: 33313438
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):428-35
pubmed: 21478876
Science. 2009 Mar 27;323(5922):1722-5
pubmed: 19264983
Cell. 2020 May 28;181(5):1036-1045.e9
pubmed: 32416070
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):905-914
pubmed: 33356051
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):619-629
pubmed: 33232588
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Oct 9;5(1):235
pubmed: 33037188