Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes: a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women.
obstetrics
primary care
public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2022
16 03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2022
pubmed:
18
3
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few interventions exist to address the high burden of stillbirths in apparently healthy pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To establish whether a trial on the impact of routine Doppler screening in a low-risk obstetric population is warranted, we determined the prevalence of abnormal fetal umbilical artery resistance indices among low-risk pregnant women using a low-cost Doppler device in five LMICs. We conducted a multicentre, prospective cohort study in Ghana, India, Kenya, Rwanda and South Africa. Trained nurses or midwives performed a single, continuous-wave Doppler screening using the Umbiflow device for low-risk pregnant women (according to local guidelines) between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation. We assessed the prevalence of abnormal (raised) resistance index (RI), including absent end diastolic flow (AEDF), and compared pregnancy and health service utilisation outcomes between women with abnormal RI versus those with normal RI. Of 7151 women screened, 495 (6.9%) had an abnormal RI, including 14 (0.2%) with AEDF. Caesarean section (40.8% vs 28.1%), labour induction (20.5% vs 9.0%) and low birth weight (<2500 g) (15.0% vs 6.8%) were significantly more frequent among women with abnormal RI compared with women with normal RI. Abnormal RI was associated with lower birth weights across all weight centiles. Stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates were similar between women with normal and abnormal RI. A single Doppler screening of low-risk pregnant women in LMICs using the Umbiflow device can detect a large number of fetuses at risk of growth restriction and consequent adverse perinatal outcomes. Many perinatal deaths could potentially be averted with appropriate intervention strategies. CTRI/2018/07/01486.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35296477
pii: bmjopen-2021-053622
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053622
pmc: PMC8928296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e053622Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
©World Health Organization 2022. Licensee BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)/University of Pretoria (UP) Maternal and Infant Healthcare Strategies Unit (VV, RCP) has previously received funding from SAMRC and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for Umbiflow research done by Nkosi et al. and Hlongwane et al. The CSIR provided the Umbiflow Doppler probes and Umbiflow software used in this study. As a satellite research unit, the SAMRC Maternal and Infant Healthcare Strategies Unit receives research funding from the SAMRC.
Références
BMJ. 2013 Jan 24;346:f108
pubmed: 23349424
S Afr Med J. 1989 Dec 2;76(11):623-5
pubmed: 2688142
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Nov;85(11):867-72
pubmed: 18038077
Semin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;32(3):213-8
pubmed: 18482624
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):288-300
pubmed: 21215383
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Aug;100(8):727-32
pubmed: 8399010
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 18;34:100792
pubmed: 33997726
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;(11):CD007529
pubmed: 24222334
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;(4):CD001450
pubmed: 25874722
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2089-2097
pubmed: 26360240
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):830-6
pubmed: 9351773
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):61-73
pubmed: 18596274
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Mar;20(3):233-9
pubmed: 17437225
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9
pubmed: 26909664
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;173(4):1049-57
pubmed: 7485292
BJOG. 2018 Nov;125(12):1591-1599
pubmed: 29782696
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Oct 15;116(2):164-9
pubmed: 15358457
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):417-425
pubmed: 23746775
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;188(4):1011-5
pubmed: 12712102
S Afr Med J. 2005 Jan;95(1):62-4
pubmed: 15762252
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016 Oct 21;2:11
pubmed: 27795833
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):869-877
pubmed: 24084547
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;93(3):212-6
pubmed: 3964595
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan;92(1):F62-7
pubmed: 17185432
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):300-8
pubmed: 22464066
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 24;14(1):e1002220
pubmed: 28118360
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):233-39
pubmed: 23371348
S Afr Med J. 2019 Apr 29;109(5):347-352
pubmed: 31131803
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 08;(9):CD008136
pubmed: 26346107
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):e150-e154
pubmed: 28426621
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142743
pubmed: 26600311