Pancreatico-Jejunostomy On Isolated Loop After Pancreatico-Duodenectomy: Is It Worthwhile?
Isolated-loop pancreatico-jejunostomy
Pancreatico-duodenectomy
Pancreatico-jejunostomy
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
22
10
2021
accepted:
11
02
2022
pubmed:
18
3
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
entrez:
17
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postoperative morbidity remains a significant problem after pancreatico-duodenectomy. The management of pancreatic stump continues to be a challenge, and many technical solutions have been developed over the years. In this study, we report the results obtained with the use of an isolated loop for pancreatico-jejunostomy in patients with soft pancreas and small pancreatic duct diameter. Clinical data of patients submitted to pancreatico-duodenectomy in a period of sixteen years (2005-2020) were extracted from a prospective database. Patients with soft pancreas, main duct diameter < 2 mm and reconstruction by pancreatico-jejunostomy on single loop or isolated loop were selected. Primary end-point was the incidence of clinically relevant fistulas in the two groups of patients. Secondary endpoint was the length of postoperative hospital stay. A propensity score matching analysis was used for the statistics. Two hundred and twenty-one patients with the above characteristics were found in the database. One hundred and twelve of these received a single-loop reconstruction and 109 an isolated loop reconstruction. Incidence of clinically relevant fistulas was higher in the first group (41% vs 27%; p = 0.023). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the second group (21 days vs 15; p < 0.001). These results were confirmed at the propensity score matching. In patients with soft pancreatic texture and small main duct diameter, pancreatico-jejunostomy on isolated loop is associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant fistulas than after classic reconstruction. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced, with consequent reduction of cost.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Postoperative morbidity remains a significant problem after pancreatico-duodenectomy. The management of pancreatic stump continues to be a challenge, and many technical solutions have been developed over the years. In this study, we report the results obtained with the use of an isolated loop for pancreatico-jejunostomy in patients with soft pancreas and small pancreatic duct diameter.
METHODS
Clinical data of patients submitted to pancreatico-duodenectomy in a period of sixteen years (2005-2020) were extracted from a prospective database. Patients with soft pancreas, main duct diameter < 2 mm and reconstruction by pancreatico-jejunostomy on single loop or isolated loop were selected. Primary end-point was the incidence of clinically relevant fistulas in the two groups of patients. Secondary endpoint was the length of postoperative hospital stay. A propensity score matching analysis was used for the statistics.
RESULTS
Two hundred and twenty-one patients with the above characteristics were found in the database. One hundred and twelve of these received a single-loop reconstruction and 109 an isolated loop reconstruction. Incidence of clinically relevant fistulas was higher in the first group (41% vs 27%; p = 0.023). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the second group (21 days vs 15; p < 0.001). These results were confirmed at the propensity score matching.
CONCLUSION
In patients with soft pancreatic texture and small main duct diameter, pancreatico-jejunostomy on isolated loop is associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant fistulas than after classic reconstruction. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced, with consequent reduction of cost.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35296957
doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05296-y
pii: 10.1007/s11605-022-05296-y
pmc: PMC9184425
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1205-1212Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
HPB (Oxford). 2009 Jun;11(4):326-31
pubmed: 19718360
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Jun;164(6):545-8
pubmed: 3589910
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):761-8
pubmed: 17981197
Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13
pubmed: 16003309
Arch Surg. 2008 Dec;143(12):1184-8
pubmed: 19075170
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):713-22
pubmed: 24467711
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;42(10):1584-90
pubmed: 27266408
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015 Aug;29(4):701-16
pubmed: 26226905
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):937-943
pubmed: 29240007
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):331-40
pubmed: 25644428
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):279
pubmed: 32819274
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):306-10
pubmed: 18556251
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1445-1450
pubmed: 32495135
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 May;76(3):175-9
pubmed: 7912489
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591
pubmed: 28040257
Dig Surg. 2002;19(3):199-204
pubmed: 12119522
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1084-91
pubmed: 24975853
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 7;16(25):3178-82
pubmed: 20593503
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Aug;143(2):271-2
pubmed: 941087
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5
pubmed: 17629996
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jan;16(1):89-102; discussion 102-3
pubmed: 22065319
Chir Ital. 2008 Sep-Oct;60(5):641-9
pubmed: 19062486
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Jul;20(7):676-683
pubmed: 29456198
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1119-1126
pubmed: 31292889
Surgery. 2013 Jun;153(6):743-52
pubmed: 23601899
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;8(6):701-5
pubmed: 15358331