Somatostatin analogues for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after open pancreatoduodenectomy: A nationwide analysis.


Journal

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1424-3911
Titre abrégé: Pancreatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100966936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 29 11 2021
revised: 02 02 2022
accepted: 07 03 2022
pubmed: 20 3 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
entrez: 19 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Somatostatin analogues (SA) are currently used to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) development. However, its use is controversial. This study investigated the effect of different SA protocols on the incidence of POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy in a nationwide population. All patients undergoing elective open pancreatoduodenectomy were included from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2017). Patients were divided into six groups: no SA, octreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide, octreotide only in high-risk (HR) patients and lanreotide only in HR patients. Primary endpoint was POPF grade B/C. The updated alternative Fistula Risk Score was used to compare POPF rates across various risk scenarios. 1992 patients were included. Overall POPF rate was 13.1%. Lanreotide (10.0%), octreotide-HR (9.4%) and no protocol (12.7%) POPF rates were lower compared to the other protocols (varying from 15.1 to 19.1%, p = 0.001) in crude analysis. Sub-analysis in patients with HR of POPF showed a significantly lower rate of POPF when treated with lanreotide (10.0%) compared to no protocol, octreotide and pasireotide protocol (21.6-26.9%, p = 0.006). Octreotide-HR and lanreotide-HR protocol POPF rates were comparable to lanreotide protocol, however not significantly different from the other protocols. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated lanreotide protocol to be positively associated with a low odds-ratio (OR) for POPF (OR 0.387, 95% CI 0.180-0.834, p = 0.015). In-hospital mortality rates were not affected. Use of lanreotide in all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy has a potential protective effect on POPF development. Protocols for HR patients only might be favorable too. However, future studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Somatostatin analogues (SA) are currently used to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) development. However, its use is controversial. This study investigated the effect of different SA protocols on the incidence of POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy in a nationwide population.
METHODS METHODS
All patients undergoing elective open pancreatoduodenectomy were included from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2017). Patients were divided into six groups: no SA, octreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide, octreotide only in high-risk (HR) patients and lanreotide only in HR patients. Primary endpoint was POPF grade B/C. The updated alternative Fistula Risk Score was used to compare POPF rates across various risk scenarios.
RESULTS RESULTS
1992 patients were included. Overall POPF rate was 13.1%. Lanreotide (10.0%), octreotide-HR (9.4%) and no protocol (12.7%) POPF rates were lower compared to the other protocols (varying from 15.1 to 19.1%, p = 0.001) in crude analysis. Sub-analysis in patients with HR of POPF showed a significantly lower rate of POPF when treated with lanreotide (10.0%) compared to no protocol, octreotide and pasireotide protocol (21.6-26.9%, p = 0.006). Octreotide-HR and lanreotide-HR protocol POPF rates were comparable to lanreotide protocol, however not significantly different from the other protocols. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated lanreotide protocol to be positively associated with a low odds-ratio (OR) for POPF (OR 0.387, 95% CI 0.180-0.834, p = 0.015). In-hospital mortality rates were not affected.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Use of lanreotide in all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy has a potential protective effect on POPF development. Protocols for HR patients only might be favorable too. However, future studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35304104
pii: S1424-3903(22)00095-3
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.03.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Somatostatin 51110-01-1
Octreotide RWM8CCW8GP

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

421-426

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Boukje T Bootsma (BT)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: b.bootsma@amsterdamumc.nl.

Victor D Plat (VD)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Tim van de Brug (T)

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Daitlin E Huisman (DE)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

M Botti (M)

Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Italy.

Peter B van den Boezem (PB)

Department of Surgery, Radboudumc Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Bert A Bonsing (BA)

Department of Surgery, Leids Universitary Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Koop Bosscha (K)

Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

Cornelis H C Dejong (CHC)

Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitary Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Bas Groot-Koerkamp (B)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Jeroen Hagendoorn (J)

Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Erwin van der Harst (E)

Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Ignace H de Hingh (IH)

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Vincent E de Meijer (VE)

Department of Surgery, Universitary Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Misha D Luyer (MD)

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs (VB)

Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

Bobby K Pranger (BK)

Department of Surgery, Universitary Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Hjalmar C van Santvoort (HC)

Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Jan H Wijsman (JH)

Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

Barbara M Zonderhuis (BM)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Geert Kazemier (G)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Marc G Besselink (MG)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Freek Daams (F)

Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH