Residual ctDNA after treatment predicts early relapse in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)
early detection
liquid biopsy
minimal residual disease (MRD)
non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
12
10
2021
revised:
02
02
2022
accepted:
14
02
2022
pubmed:
21
3
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
20
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Identification of residual disease in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following treatment with curative intent holds promise to identify patients at risk of relapse. New methods can detect circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to fractional concentrations as low as a few parts per million, and clinical evidence is required to inform their use. We analyzed 363 serial plasma samples from 88 patients with early-stage NSCLC (48.9%/28.4%/22.7% at stage I/II/III), predominantly adenocarcinomas (62.5%), treated with curative intent by surgery (n = 61), surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy (n = 8), or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19). Tumour exome sequencing identified somatic mutations and plasma was analyzed using patient-specific RaDaR™ assays with up to 48 amplicons targeting tumour-specific variants unique to each patient. ctDNA was detected before treatment in 24%, 77% and 87% of patients with stage I, II and III disease, respectively, and in 26% of all longitudinal samples. The median tumour fraction detected was 0.042%, with 63% of samples <0.1% and 36% of samples <0.01%. ctDNA detection had clinical specificity >98.5% and preceded clinical detection of recurrence of the primary tumour by a median of 212.5 days. ctDNA was detected after treatment in 18/28 (64.3%) of patients who had clinical recurrence of their primary tumour. Detection within the landmark timepoint 2 weeks to 4 months after treatment end occurred in 17% of patients, and was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR): 14.8, P <0.00001] and overall survival (HR: 5.48, P <0.0003). ctDNA was detected 1-3 days after surgery in 25% of patients yet was not associated with disease recurrence. Detection before treatment was associated with shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival (HR: 2.97 and 3.14, P values 0.01 and 0.003, respectively). ctDNA detection after initial treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC using sensitive patient-specific assays has potential to identify patients who may benefit from further therapeutic intervention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Identification of residual disease in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following treatment with curative intent holds promise to identify patients at risk of relapse. New methods can detect circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to fractional concentrations as low as a few parts per million, and clinical evidence is required to inform their use.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We analyzed 363 serial plasma samples from 88 patients with early-stage NSCLC (48.9%/28.4%/22.7% at stage I/II/III), predominantly adenocarcinomas (62.5%), treated with curative intent by surgery (n = 61), surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy (n = 8), or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19). Tumour exome sequencing identified somatic mutations and plasma was analyzed using patient-specific RaDaR™ assays with up to 48 amplicons targeting tumour-specific variants unique to each patient.
RESULTS
ctDNA was detected before treatment in 24%, 77% and 87% of patients with stage I, II and III disease, respectively, and in 26% of all longitudinal samples. The median tumour fraction detected was 0.042%, with 63% of samples <0.1% and 36% of samples <0.01%. ctDNA detection had clinical specificity >98.5% and preceded clinical detection of recurrence of the primary tumour by a median of 212.5 days. ctDNA was detected after treatment in 18/28 (64.3%) of patients who had clinical recurrence of their primary tumour. Detection within the landmark timepoint 2 weeks to 4 months after treatment end occurred in 17% of patients, and was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR): 14.8, P <0.00001] and overall survival (HR: 5.48, P <0.0003). ctDNA was detected 1-3 days after surgery in 25% of patients yet was not associated with disease recurrence. Detection before treatment was associated with shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival (HR: 2.97 and 3.14, P values 0.01 and 0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
ctDNA detection after initial treatment of patients with early-stage NSCLC using sensitive patient-specific assays has potential to identify patients who may benefit from further therapeutic intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35306155
pii: S0923-7534(22)00123-5
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.007
pmc: PMC9067454
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
500-510Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : A20240
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C9545/A29580
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : BRC-1215-20014
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C9685/A25177
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure NR and DGa are co-founders, and NR, DGa, MP, KHo, SH, GM, CGS and GS are current or former employees/officers/consultants of Inivata Ltd. Inivata provided analysis of samples using the RaDaR™ assays. DGa and KHe are current employees of AstraZeneca Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jun 17;12(548):
pubmed: 32554709
Cancer Discov. 2017 Dec;7(12):1394-1403
pubmed: 28899864
Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):494-505.e6
pubmed: 31711920
Nat Cancer. 2020 Feb;1(2):176-183
pubmed: 34505064
Nat Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):1114-1124
pubmed: 32483360
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7867):432-437
pubmed: 34135506
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):7058-7067
pubmed: 31439586
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Apr;17(4):223-238
pubmed: 28233803
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;26(11):2556-2564
pubmed: 32170028
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193802
pubmed: 29543828
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Sep;124(3):357-364
pubmed: 28735685
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1199-209
pubmed: 23484797
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194630
pubmed: 29547634
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 26;7(302):302ra133
pubmed: 26311728
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):213-9
pubmed: 23396013
Ann Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;30(3):358-359
pubmed: 30649226
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 20;13(12):e1002198
pubmed: 27997533
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):108-12
pubmed: 23563269
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9530-5
pubmed: 21586637
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92
pubmed: 27384348
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 3;96(16):9236-41
pubmed: 10430926
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Aug 7;11(504):
pubmed: 31391323
Nat Biotechnol. 2021 Dec;39(12):1537-1547
pubmed: 34294911
Med (N Y). 2021 Dec 10;2(12):1292-1313
pubmed: 35590147
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 04;6:8760
pubmed: 26530965
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;545(7655):446-451
pubmed: 28445469
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):547-555
pubmed: 27018799
Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):985-90
pubmed: 18670422
Cancer Discov. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):2968-2986
pubmed: 34785539
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jun 20;44(11):e108
pubmed: 27060149
Sci Transl Med. 2012 May 30;4(136):136ra68
pubmed: 22649089