Accuracy of the COMBEI BP118A Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in General Population - Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.
Combei
accuracy
blood pressure measurement
home blood pressure
oscillometric
validation
Journal
Vascular health and risk management
ISSN: 1178-2048
Titre abrégé: Vasc Health Risk Manag
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273479
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
accepted:
03
03
2022
entrez:
21
3
2022
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
23
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Electronic devices for blood pressure (BP) measurements must undergo independent clinical validation as recommended by various authorities and scientific societies. To assess the accuracy of the Combei BP118A device in the general population according to the Universal Standard Validation Protocol. The new-developed Combei BP118A device measures BP at the brachial level using the oscillometric method. The study was performed according to the "AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) protocol". Subjects (n = 88) were recruited to fulfill the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria according to the protocol requirements using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Differences between observers' mercury sphygmomanometer reference measurements and device BP values (test versus reference) and their standard deviation (SD) were calculated. Ninety-one subjects were selected, 88 of whom were included. The mean BP differences between the simultaneous observers' reference measurements were -0.2 ± 1.7 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and -0.2 ± 1.7 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). For validation criterion 1, the mean difference ± SD between the reference and device BP values were 3.6 ± 5.5 mmHg for SBP and 1.4 ± 4.5 mmHg for DBP. For criterion 2, the SD of the mean BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5/4.1 mmHg for SBP/DBP (≤5.9/6.8). These results fulfilled the protocol requirements. The Combei BP118A oscillometric device for home BP measurement fulfilled all of the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in general population and consequently can be recommended for home BP measurements.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Electronic devices for blood pressure (BP) measurements must undergo independent clinical validation as recommended by various authorities and scientific societies.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
To assess the accuracy of the Combei BP118A device in the general population according to the Universal Standard Validation Protocol.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The new-developed Combei BP118A device measures BP at the brachial level using the oscillometric method. The study was performed according to the "AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) protocol". Subjects (n = 88) were recruited to fulfill the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria according to the protocol requirements using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Differences between observers' mercury sphygmomanometer reference measurements and device BP values (test versus reference) and their standard deviation (SD) were calculated.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Ninety-one subjects were selected, 88 of whom were included. The mean BP differences between the simultaneous observers' reference measurements were -0.2 ± 1.7 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and -0.2 ± 1.7 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). For validation criterion 1, the mean difference ± SD between the reference and device BP values were 3.6 ± 5.5 mmHg for SBP and 1.4 ± 4.5 mmHg for DBP. For criterion 2, the SD of the mean BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5/4.1 mmHg for SBP/DBP (≤5.9/6.8). These results fulfilled the protocol requirements.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The Combei BP118A oscillometric device for home BP measurement fulfilled all of the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in general population and consequently can be recommended for home BP measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35309162
doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S353715
pii: 353715
pmc: PMC8926011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
123-129Informations de copyright
© 2022 Tasić et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors conducted validation studies for various manufacturers, they received honorarium for this validation study. Prof. Dr. Nebojsa Tasić reports personal fees from ISVH, during the conduct of the study. Dr Jirar Topouchian reports personal fees from FMRI, during the conduct of the study. Prof. Dr. Roland Asmar reports personal fees from COMBEI Co, during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
J Hypertens. 2018 Mar;36(3):472-478
pubmed: 29384983
J Hypertens. 2019 Mar;37(3):459-466
pubmed: 30702492
J Hypertens. 2020 Mar;38(3):395-399
pubmed: 31688462
J Hypertens. 2021 Jul 1;39(7):1293-1302
pubmed: 33710173