Comparison of porcelain veneer fracture in implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either titanium, cobalt-chromium, or zirconia: An in vitro study.
fracture strength
implant-supported prostheses
porcelain veneer
Journal
Clinical and experimental dental research
ISSN: 2057-4347
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
23
02
2022
received:
13
04
2021
accepted:
24
02
2022
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
21
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare porcelain veneer strength on screw-retained implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either milled titanium (Ti), cobalt-chromium (CoCr), and yttria-stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP) in an in vitro loading model. Fifteen screw-retained maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses (FDP), five each of Ti, CoCr, and Y-TZP frameworks with porcelain veneers were included. All FDPs were subjected to thermocycling before loading until fracture of the veneer. The load was applied at the distal fossa of the occlusal area of the pontic replacing 24. Fracture loads were analyzed, and the fracture quality was assessed. Statistical analysis on the fracture load was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test. The statistical significance was set at p < .05. There was no statistical significance found between the groups regarding fracture load. The highest and lowest load was seen within the CoCr FDP, varying between 340 and 1484 N. Different types of fracture appearances were seen. The Y-TZP FDPs had a higher number of fractures locally in the loaded area while CoCr and Ti more often showed cracks in the anterior region, at a distance from the loaded area. Within the limitations of this study, the conclusion was that framework material may affect the fracture behavior of maxillary full-arch bridges; however, there were no differences in veneer fracture strength when frameworks of Ti, CoCr, or Y-TZP were compared.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35313086
doi: 10.1002/cre2.558
pmc: PMC9033539
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Dental Materials
0
Chromium
0R0008Q3JB
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Cobalt
3G0H8C9362
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
544-551Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Oral Sci. 2015 Sep;57(3):255-61
pubmed: 26369491
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:184-198
pubmed: 30328185
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):325-7
pubmed: 1507094
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1381-1387
pubmed: 27995653
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Sep;34(9):702-9
pubmed: 17716270
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):64-70
pubmed: 30478870
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Mar;97(3):137-40
pubmed: 17394911
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):603-611
pubmed: 29923628
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Nov;62(5):536-41
pubmed: 2607478
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12(1):26-34
pubmed: 11168268
Eur J Dent. 2010 Apr;4(2):223-32
pubmed: 20396457
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2010 Sep;115(5):343-352
pubmed: 21833158
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:84-98
pubmed: 24660192
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1482-1492
pubmed: 31711089
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):820-6
pubmed: 21635559
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(5):549-54
pubmed: 8112795
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:224-236
pubmed: 30306694
J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1164-74
pubmed: 24135294
Dent Mater. 2013 Aug;29(8):815-23
pubmed: 23746750
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jun;81(6):652-61
pubmed: 10347352
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):102-10
pubmed: 22299086
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Apr;8(2):544-551
pubmed: 35313086
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S147-S165
pubmed: 30109306
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017 Nov 14;3(1):74-83
pubmed: 29242815
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2015 Oct 26;1(2):49-56
pubmed: 29744140
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80
pubmed: 25580846
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:22-38
pubmed: 23062125
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):388-94
pubmed: 19463666
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):137-141
pubmed: 30885581
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):207-17
pubmed: 18384411
Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35(6):297-303
pubmed: 271452
J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Nov;1(3):129-35
pubmed: 21165268
Int Dent J. 1995 Feb;45(1):16-26
pubmed: 7607740
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov;25(11):1307-1310
pubmed: 25279692
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jul;31(7):634-645
pubmed: 32249972
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:39-49
pubmed: 23062126