Movement therapy in advanced heart failure assisted by a lightweight wearable robot: a feasibility pilot study.
Exercise training
Exoskeleton
Heart failure
Myosuit
Rehabilitation
Robotic-assisted
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
revised:
03
02
2022
received:
28
09
2021
accepted:
09
03
2022
pubmed:
24
3
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
entrez:
23
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the safety, feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of an assisted mobilization of advanced heart failure patients, using a lightweight, exoskeleton-type robot (Myosuit, MyoSwiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland). Twenty patients in functional NYHA class III performed activities of daily life (ADL, n = 10) or participated in a single, standardized, 60 min rehabilitation exercise unit (REU, n = 10) with and without the Myosuit. The outcome assessment included the evaluation of vital signs, adverse events, rates of perceived exertion and dyspnoea (RPE, RPD), the ability to perform ADL or REU, and the individual acceptability. The mean age of the subjects was 49.4 (±11.0) years; 80% were male. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 22.1% (±7.4%) and the median NT-proBNP 2054 pg/mL (IQR 677, 3270 pg/mL). In all patients, mobilization with the Myosuit was feasible independently or with minor support. The mean individual difference in the total walking distance of the patients without and with robotic assistance was -26.5 m (95% confidence interval (CI) -142 to 78 m, P = 0.241). No adverse events occurred. RPE and RPD showed no significant difference with or without the device (ADL: RPE -0.1 m, 95% CI -1.42 to 1.62, P = 0.932 and RPD -0.95 m, 95% CI -0.38 to 2.28, P = 0.141; REU: RPE 1.1 m, 95% CI -2.90 to 0.70, P = 0.201 and RPD 0.5 m, 95% CI -2.02 to 1.02, P = 0.435). All median responses in the acceptability questionnaire were positive. The patients felt safe and enjoyed the experience; 85% would be interested in participating in robot-assisted training on a regular basis. This feasibility pilot trial provides first indications that a robotic exoskeleton-assisted mobilization of patients with advanced heart failure is safe, feasible, well-tolerated, and well-accepted. The results are highly encouraging to further pursue this innovative approach in rehabilitation programmes. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04839133.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35320878
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13903
pmc: PMC9065814
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04839133']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1643-1650Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:944-949
pubmed: 31374751
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Feb 17;53(2):jrm00154
pubmed: 33585943
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1643-1650
pubmed: 35320878
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Oct 30;14:581815
pubmed: 33192438
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 27;(4):CD003331
pubmed: 24771460
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Jul 24;13:57
pubmed: 31396072
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):78-85
pubmed: 29434463
Front Neurorobot. 2017 Oct 27;11:57
pubmed: 29163120
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1806
pubmed: 32019981
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0191894
pubmed: 29444172
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Apr;13(4):347-57
pubmed: 21436360
JAMA. 2009 Apr 8;301(14):1439-50
pubmed: 19351941
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 8;17(1):135
pubmed: 33032627
Acta Cardiol. 2015 Dec;70(6):665-71
pubmed: 26717214
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jun 19;14(1):60
pubmed: 28629390
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):122-8
pubmed: 20140407
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 May;43(5):1260-9
pubmed: 25724733
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Sep;26(9):1078-81
pubmed: 7808239