Multilevel musculo-fascial defect magnetic resonance study of female pelvic floor: retrospective case control study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction after the first vaginal delivery.
architectural distortion
delivery
levator ani muscle
magnetic resonance imaging
prolapse
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
revised:
05
02
2022
received:
29
08
2021
accepted:
23
02
2022
pubmed:
25
3
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
entrez:
24
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a detailed display of the pelvic floor structures responsible for normal pelvic floor anatomy. The aim of the study is to assess the appearance of musculo-fascial defects in women with pelvic floor dysfunction following first vaginal delivery. Analysis of axial T3 (Tesla 3) MRI scans from a case control study of symptomatic (n = 149) and asymptomatic (n = 60) women after first vaginal delivery. Presence and severity of pelvic organ support and attachment system defects in three axial pelvic planes were assessed. In the symptomatic group, major muscular defects were found in 67.1% (for pubovisceral muscle complex) and 87.9% (for iliococcygeal muscle). Only 6.7% of major pubovisceral and 35.0% of major iliococcygeal defects were identified in the controls (p = 0.000). Prolapse patients had an odds ratio (OR) of 22.1 (95% CI 8.94-54.67) to have major pubovisceral muscle complex defect and OR of 4.9 (95% CI 1.51-15.71) to have major iliococcygeal muscle defect. Fascial defects were found in 60.4% and 83.2% the symptomatic group, respectively. Those with prolapse had an OR of 29.1 (95% CI 9.77-86.31) to have facial defect at the level of pubovisceral muscle complex and an OR of 16.9 (95% CI 7.62-37.69) to have fascial defect at the level of iliococcygeal muscle. Uterosacral ligaments detachment was associated with prolapse with an OR of 10.1 (95% CI 4.01-25.29). For the model based on combination on all MRI markers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.921. This study provides comprehensive data about first vaginal delivery-induced changes in the levator ani muscle and endopelvic fascial attachment system. These changes are seen also in asymptomatic controls, but they are significantly less expressed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35322407
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14344
pmc: PMC9564734
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
628-638Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1593-1595
pubmed: 31143979
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Oct;25(10):1375-9
pubmed: 24788366
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):773-8
pubmed: 17043740
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan;23(1):57-63
pubmed: 21818620
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Mar;23(3):285-93
pubmed: 22068322
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Nov;34(8):774-80
pubmed: 25156808
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Sep;30(7):1366-70
pubmed: 21567449
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):46-53
pubmed: 12517644
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jun;101(6):628-638
pubmed: 35322407
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):277-85
pubmed: 8559539
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):853-862
pubmed: 27607881
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):863-7
pubmed: 18193147
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):89.e1-5
pubmed: 19426956
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):447-51
pubmed: 14990404
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):324-32
pubmed: 16880302
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):535-543
pubmed: 31388719
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Sep;25(9):1263-8
pubmed: 24832855
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Apr;1101:266-96
pubmed: 17416924
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 May;28(5):661-673
pubmed: 27640064
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26
pubmed: 19937315
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Apr;94(4):347-51
pubmed: 25625336
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):295-302
pubmed: 17267827
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):44-50
pubmed: 11483902