Impact of Molecule Concentration, Diffusion Rates and Surface Passivation on Single-Molecule Fluorescence Studies in Solution.
burst analysis
chance coincidence probability
confocal fluorescence microscopy
single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer
two-color coincidence detection
Journal
Biomolecules
ISSN: 2218-273X
Titre abrégé: Biomolecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 03 2022
18 03 2022
Historique:
received:
08
02
2022
revised:
09
03
2022
accepted:
16
03
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
pubmed:
26
3
2022
medline:
23
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For single-molecule studies in solution, very small concentrations of dye-labelled molecules are employed in order to achieve single-molecule sensitivity. In typical studies with confocal microscopes, often concentrations in the pico-molar regime are required. For various applications that make use of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) or two-color coincidence detection (TCCD), the molecule concentration must be set explicitly to targeted values and furthermore needs to be stable over a period of several hours. As a consequence, specific demands must be imposed on the surface passivation of the cover slides during the measurements. The aim of having only one molecule in the detection volume at the time is not only affected by the absolute molecule concentration, but also by the rate of diffusion. Therefore, we discuss approaches to control and to measure absolute molecule concentrations. Furthermore, we introduce an approach to calculate the probability of chance coincidence events and demonstrate that measurements with challenging smFRET samples require a strict limit of maximal sample concentrations in order to produce meaningful results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35327660
pii: biom12030468
doi: 10.3390/biom12030468
pmc: PMC8946791
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Jan 13;109(1):617-28
pubmed: 16851054
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Jul;405(18):5983-91
pubmed: 23649926
Biophys J. 2005 Nov;89(5):3508-22
pubmed: 16113120
J Microsc. 2008 Nov;232(2):343-52
pubmed: 19017233
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2001;52:233-53
pubmed: 11326065
Chemphyschem. 2011 Feb 25;12(3):704-10
pubmed: 21344599
Biochemistry. 2006 Dec 5;45(48):14233-46
pubmed: 17128963
Anal Chem. 2019 Feb 19;91(4):2570-2576
pubmed: 30648382
Chembiochem. 2014 May 5;15(7):977-85
pubmed: 24644265
Bioconjug Chem. 2002 Sep-Oct;13(5):1163-70
pubmed: 12236801
Chem Soc Rev. 2014 Feb 21;43(4):1156-71
pubmed: 24037326
ACS Synth Biol. 2018 Feb 16;7(2):405-411
pubmed: 29370697
Anal Chem. 2017 Nov 7;89(21):11278-11285
pubmed: 29022338
Anal Chem. 2012 Mar 20;84(6):2729-36
pubmed: 22380604
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008 Feb;18(1):16-26
pubmed: 18221865
J Biotechnol. 2001 Apr 13;86(3):163-80
pubmed: 11257530
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6710-5
pubmed: 8692883
Molecules. 2014 Nov 25;19(12):19269-91
pubmed: 25429558
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 24;7:46753
pubmed: 28436469
Elife. 2021 Mar 29;10:
pubmed: 33779550
Anal Chem. 2006 Nov 15;78(22):7707-15
pubmed: 17105162
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14400-5
pubmed: 18780782
Anal Chem. 2003 Apr 1;75(7):1664-70
pubmed: 12705600
J Phys Chem B. 2008 May 15;112(19):6214-20
pubmed: 18154285
Nat Methods. 2017 Feb;14(2):174-180
pubmed: 27918541
Commun Biol. 2019 Dec 6;2:459
pubmed: 31840104
ACS Synth Biol. 2017 Mar 17;6(3):535-544
pubmed: 27966891
Biophys J. 2020 Feb 4;118(3):688-697
pubmed: 31916943
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9;97(10):5179-84
pubmed: 10792044
Anal Chem. 2006 Feb 15;78(4):1061-70
pubmed: 16478096
J Biol Chem. 2017 Sep 22;292(38):15636-15648
pubmed: 28754692
Methods Enzymol. 2010;475:455-514
pubmed: 20627168
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Nov 24;109(46):21930-7
pubmed: 16853850