Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes.
CompACT
cultural adaptation
linguistic validation
outcome measures
psychological flexibility
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 03 2022
08 03 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2022
revised:
09
02
2022
accepted:
04
03
2022
entrez:
25
3
2022
pubmed:
26
3
2022
medline:
20
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) processes (CompACT) is a 23-item self-report questionnaire assessing psychological flexibility, which is the overarching construct underpinning the ACT framework. We conducted a two-phase project to develop validated versions of the CompACT in three languages: phase 1-cross-cultural adaptation; and phase 2-psychometric validation of the questionnaire for use in Italy, Germany and Spain. This article focuses on the first phase. We translated and culturally adapted the CompACT in the three target languages, following the ISPOR TCA Task Force guidelines. The process was overseen by a translation panel (three translators, at least two multiple sclerosis (MS) researchers and a lay person), ACT experts and clinicians from the research team of each country and the original CompACT developers. We debriefed the new questionnaire versions via face-to-face interviews with a minimum of four adults from the general population (GP) and four adults with MS in each country. The translation-adaptation process went smoothly in the three countries, with some items (7 in Italy, 4 in Germany, 6 in Spain) revised after feedback from ACT experts. Cognitive debriefing showed that the CompACT was deemed easy to understand and score in each target country by both GP and MS adults. The Italian, German and Spanish versions of the CompACT have semantic, conceptual and normative equivalence to the original scale and good content validity. Our findings are informative for researchers adapting the CompACT and other self-reported outcome measures into multiple languages and cultures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35328838
pii: ijerph19063150
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063150
pmc: PMC8953951
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020 Jul;17:109-118
pubmed: 32834969
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:255-91
pubmed: 17716089
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104
pubmed: 15804318
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41
pubmed: 25698408
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25
pubmed: 16300724
Rehabil Psychol. 2018 Feb;63(1):29-42
pubmed: 29154558
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(22):6582-6592
pubmed: 34406895
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88
pubmed: 22035996
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74
pubmed: 20874835
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:2195
pubmed: 32982888
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:141-68
pubmed: 21219193
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231380
pubmed: 32271833
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):865-78
pubmed: 21151705
Behav Ther. 2014 Nov;45(6):831-9
pubmed: 25311291
Qual Life Res. 2003 May;12(3):229-38
pubmed: 12769135
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):829-850
pubmed: 32614192
Assessment. 2018 Jun;25(4):458-482
pubmed: 27152011
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157
pubmed: 29435801
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(22):6926-6938
pubmed: 35100924