Assessing physical workload among people with musculoskeletal disorders: validity and reliability of the physical workload questionnaire.


Journal

BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 05 01 2022
accepted: 14 03 2022
entrez: 25 3 2022
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 29 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Demands of physical work are related to musculoskeletal disorders, and hence, important to assess. The Physical Workload Questionnaire (PWQ) is based on 26 items related to physical workload. The PWQ has been translated into Norwegian, but its psychometric properties have not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the PWQ among patients with musculoskeletal disorders. A cross-sectional study with a test-retest design was conducted to assess construct validity (structural validity and hypothesis testing) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) among employed patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess the structural validity and number of items to be included in the Norwegian version of the PWQ. Hypothesis testing was assessed by 14 a priori hypotheses ("known" group, convergent and discriminant validity). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC In total, 115 patients with a mean age (SD) of 46 (9) years were included, of which 48 were included in the reliability analyses. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in two subscales: "Heavy physical work" (15 items, range 0-100) and "Long-lasting postures and repetitive movements" (7 items, range 0-100). No floor or ceiling effects were seen in the subscales. Twelve of the 14 (85%) predefined hypotheses were confirmed. The internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 and 0.85 on subscales 1 and 2, respectively. Test-retest reliability analyses demonstrated an ICC The Norwegian version of the PWQ demonstrated good validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate physical workload in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Demands of physical work are related to musculoskeletal disorders, and hence, important to assess. The Physical Workload Questionnaire (PWQ) is based on 26 items related to physical workload. The PWQ has been translated into Norwegian, but its psychometric properties have not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the PWQ among patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
METHODS METHODS
A cross-sectional study with a test-retest design was conducted to assess construct validity (structural validity and hypothesis testing) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) among employed patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess the structural validity and number of items to be included in the Norwegian version of the PWQ. Hypothesis testing was assessed by 14 a priori hypotheses ("known" group, convergent and discriminant validity). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 115 patients with a mean age (SD) of 46 (9) years were included, of which 48 were included in the reliability analyses. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in two subscales: "Heavy physical work" (15 items, range 0-100) and "Long-lasting postures and repetitive movements" (7 items, range 0-100). No floor or ceiling effects were seen in the subscales. Twelve of the 14 (85%) predefined hypotheses were confirmed. The internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 and 0.85 on subscales 1 and 2, respectively. Test-retest reliability analyses demonstrated an ICC
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Norwegian version of the PWQ demonstrated good validity and reliability and can be used to evaluate physical workload in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35331205
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05222-y
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05222-y
pmc: PMC8944019
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

282

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Feb;27(1):30-40
pubmed: 11266144
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 1;21(9):1021-30; discussion 1031
pubmed: 8724085
Med Lav. 2017 Dec 14;108(6):419-433
pubmed: 29240039
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Dec;61(12):980-6
pubmed: 15550603
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Feb;27(1):41-8
pubmed: 11266145
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20
pubmed: 11128900
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179
pubmed: 29260445
Appl Ergon. 2004 Jan;35(1):49-56
pubmed: 14985140
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):95-100
pubmed: 15657190
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Apr;73(4):246-53
pubmed: 26740688
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Mar;53(3):285-323
pubmed: 19753591
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Aug;34(4):250-9
pubmed: 18815713
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49
pubmed: 20169472
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Aug;85(6):587-603
pubmed: 22038085
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
pubmed: 8263569
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8
pubmed: 26409601
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):309-18
pubmed: 22390445
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jan;63(1):45-52
pubmed: 16361405
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):251-9
pubmed: 8881013
Phys Ther. 2008 May;88(5):608-19
pubmed: 18276935
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jul;64(7):487-9
pubmed: 17582087
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Jul;82(7):893-917
pubmed: 18953559
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 04;9:211-7
pubmed: 27217764
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2334-41
pubmed: 16227898
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Dec;31(6):409-37
pubmed: 16425584
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3140-51
pubmed: 11124730
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):111-6
pubmed: 23748849
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76
pubmed: 26828106

Auteurs

Lise Grethe Kjønø (LG)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. lisegret@oslomet.no.

Rikke Munk Killingmo (RM)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Ørjan Nesse Vigdal (ØN)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Margreth Grotle (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Kjersti Storheim (K)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH