Asymptomatic inguinal hernia: does it need surgical repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
ernioplasty
hernias
watchful waiting
Journal
ANZ journal of surgery
ISSN: 1445-2197
Titre abrégé: ANZ J Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101086634
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
17
01
2022
accepted:
25
02
2022
pubmed:
27
3
2022
medline:
14
10
2022
entrez:
26
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this review is to compare the outcomes of surgical repair versus watchful waiting in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were employed. We analysed primary outcomes: pain, quality of life, pain during daily activities and visual analogue scale (VAS that measures pain at rest and on movement) and secondary outcomes: postoperative complications and recurrence. Pain and quality of life were not comparable due to differences in the parameters used in different articles. Pain interfering with normal daily activity was evaluated in one study and appears more favourable in the post-repair group respect to the watchful waiting (WW) group (5.1% versus 2.2%). VAS, measured in one study, at 6 months was more favourable in the surgery group (37% versus 44%). After 12 months the outcome was better in the control group than in the repair group (28% versus 30%). Conversion rate of the patient cohorts from watchful waiting to elective surgery was between 35.03% and 57.8%. The meta-analysis did not find significant statistical differences in the two groups examined for postoperative complications [RR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.50, 1.80), P = 0.88], as for hernia recurrence [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.50, 2.02), P = 0.98]. WW seems to be an acceptable option for the patient with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms appear is safe. Acute hernia incarcerations are not particularly frequent. The incidence of chronic pain after the repair is high. Physicians must select patients carefully and explain to them the risks and benefits of surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The aim of this review is to compare the outcomes of surgical repair versus watchful waiting in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.
METHODS
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were employed. We analysed primary outcomes: pain, quality of life, pain during daily activities and visual analogue scale (VAS that measures pain at rest and on movement) and secondary outcomes: postoperative complications and recurrence.
RESULTS
Pain and quality of life were not comparable due to differences in the parameters used in different articles. Pain interfering with normal daily activity was evaluated in one study and appears more favourable in the post-repair group respect to the watchful waiting (WW) group (5.1% versus 2.2%). VAS, measured in one study, at 6 months was more favourable in the surgery group (37% versus 44%). After 12 months the outcome was better in the control group than in the repair group (28% versus 30%). Conversion rate of the patient cohorts from watchful waiting to elective surgery was between 35.03% and 57.8%. The meta-analysis did not find significant statistical differences in the two groups examined for postoperative complications [RR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.50, 1.80), P = 0.88], as for hernia recurrence [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.50, 2.02), P = 0.98].
CONCLUSION
WW seems to be an acceptable option for the patient with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms appear is safe. Acute hernia incarcerations are not particularly frequent. The incidence of chronic pain after the repair is high. Physicians must select patients carefully and explain to them the risks and benefits of surgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2433-2441Informations de copyright
© 2022 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Références
Venara A, Hubner M, Le Naoures P et al. Surgery for incarcerated hernia: short-term outcome with or without mesh. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2014; 399: 571-7.
Ramanan B, Maloley BJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. Inguinal hernia: follow or repair? Adv. Surg. 2014; 48: 1-11.
Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003; 362: 1561-71.
McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Roberts A, Withers H. Evidence-based management of groin hernia in primary care-a systematic review. Fam. Pract. 2000; 17: 442-7.
Hair A, Paterson C, Wright D, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer PJ. What effect does the duration of an inguinal hernia have on patient symptoms? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2001; 193: 125-9.
van den Heuvel B, Dwars BJ, Klassen DR, Bonjer HJ. Is surgical repair of an asymptomatic groin hernia appropriate? A review. Hernia 2011; 15: 251-9.
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 285-92.
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M et al. European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 2009; 13: 343-403.
Shakil A, Aparicio K, Barta E, Munez K. Inguinal hernias: diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Physician 2020; 102: 487-92.
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 350: 1819-27.
Bay-Nielsen M, Thomsen H, Heidemann Andersen F et al. Convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br. J. Surg. 2004; 91: 362-7.
Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA. Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann. Surg. 1996; 224: 598-602.
Kargar S, Shiryazdi SM, Zare M, Mirshamsi MH, Ahmadi S, Neamatzadeh H. Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study. Minerva Chir. 2015; 70: 83-9.
Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 835-9.
Cheek CM. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26: 459-61.
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 2018; 22: 1-165.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009; 62: 1006-12.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919.
McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 2021; 12: 55-61.
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1959; 22: 719-48.
Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M. Undue reliance on I2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2008; 8: 79.
Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Reeves D. A re-analysis of the Cochrane library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses. PLoS One 2013; 8: e69930.
De Goede B, Wijsmuller AR, van Ramshorst GH et al. Watchful waiting versus surgery of mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia in men aged 50 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2018; 267: 42-9.
O'Dwyer PJ, Norrie J, Alani A, Walker A, Duffy F, Horgan P. Observation or operation for patients with an asymptomatic inguinal hernia: a randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244: 167-73.
Patti R, Aiello P, Caruso AM, Cudia B, Di Vita G. The improvement of quality of life a indication for elective surgery in elderly patients with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia. Ann. Ital. Chir. 2014; 85: 136-42.
Sarosi GA, Wei Y, Gibbs JO et al. A clinician's guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia. Ann. Surg. 2011; 253: 605-10.
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Ramanan B, Arya S et al. Investigators of the original trial. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of a nonoperative strategy (watchful waiting) for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Ann. Surg. 2013; 258: 508-15.
Aktimur R, Çetinkünar S, Yildirim K et al. Comparison of the outcomes of watchful waiting and surgery in 80 years of age and older comorbid and minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia patients. Turk. Geriatri. Derg. 2014; 17: 338-44.
Thompson JS, Gibbs JO, Reda DJ et al. Does delaying repair of an asymptomatic hernia have a penalty? Am. J. Surg. 2008; 195: 89-93.
Chung L, Norrie J, O'Dwyer PJ. Long-term follow-up of patients with a painless inguinal hernia from a randomized clinical trial. Br. J. Surg. 2011; 98: 596-9.
Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Danish hernia database. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann. Surg. 2001; 233: 1-7.
Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin. J. Pain 2003; 19: 48-54.
Lundström KJ, Holmberg H, Montgomery A, Nordin P. Patient-reported rates of chronic pain and recurrence after groin hernia repair. Br. J. Surg. 2018; 105: 106-12.
Page B, Paterson C, Young D, O'Dwyer PJ. Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br. J. Surg. 2002; 89: 1315-8.
Reistrup H, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review. Hernia 2021; 25: 1121-8.
Hwang MJ, Bhangu A, Webster CE, Bowley DM, Gannon MX, Karandikar SS. Unintended consequences of policy change to watchful waiting for asymptomatic inguinal hernias. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2014; 96: 343-7.
Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin P, Nyrén O, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244: 212-9.
Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H, Swedish Hernia Data Base the Danish Hernia Data Base. Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br. J. Surg. 2004; 91: 1372-6.
Aasvang EK, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 6 years after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 2006; 10: 316-21.
Gong W, Li J. Operation versus watchful waiting in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias: the meta-analysis results of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Surg. 2018; 52: 120-5.
Witt WP, Gibbs J, Wang J et al. Impact of inguinal hernia repair on family and other informal caregivers. Arch. Surg. 2006; 141: 925-30.
Li J, Zhang W. Letter to the editor: "should we perform elective inguinal hernia repair in the elderly?" by Wu J. J. et al. (Hernia. 2016 Jul 20. [Epub ahead of print]). Hernia 2017; 21: 821-2.
Dong CT, Liveris A, Lewis ER et al. Do surgical emergencies stay at home? Observations from the first United States coronavirus epicenter. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021; 91: 241-6.
East B, Pawlak M, de Beaux AC. A manual reduction of hernia under analgesia/sedation (taxis) in the acute inguinal hernia: a useful technique in COVID-19 times to reduce the need for emergency surgery-a literature review. Hernia 2020; 24: 937-41.
Turan U, Dirim AB. The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency anterior abdominal wall hernia surgery: is it safe to postpone elective hernia surgery in the pandemic? Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2021; 4:1-7.
RETAINER Collaborative Group; Irish Surgical Research Collaborative. International snapshot study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on elective inguinal hernia repair. Br. J. Surg. 2021; 108: e301-e1173.
Abu Shakra I, Bez M, Ganam S et al. The volume of general surgery emergency cases in a government hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic and two other periods: a comparative, retrospective study. BMC Surg. 2021; 21: 119.
Lima DL, Pereira X, Dos Santos DC, Camacho D, Malcher F. Where are the hernias? A paradoxical decrease in emergency hernia surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. Hernia 2020; 24: 1141-2.