Predicting Outcomes in Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy: The Modified Five-Point Frailty Index Versus American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification.
ASA
Frailty
Morbidity
Mortality
Parathyroidectomy
Surgical outcomes
Thyroidectomy
mFI-5
Journal
The Journal of surgical research
ISSN: 1095-8673
Titre abrégé: J Surg Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
06
12
2021
revised:
04
02
2022
accepted:
21
02
2022
pubmed:
28
3
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
entrez:
27
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy are relatively safe procedures, with overall morbidity rates of 2%-5%. The increasing age is associated with higher likelihood of poor outcomes. The modified five-point frailty index (mFI-5) is associated with complications, but many surgeons are unfamiliar with mFI-5. We assessed the accuracy of the mFI-5 versus the commonly-used American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification to predict complications following thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Patients undergoing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy in 2015-2018 NSQIP datasets were identified. The mFI-5 scores were calculated by adding the number of the following comorbidities: congestive heart failure, hypertension requiring medication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and nonindependent functional status. Receiver operating characteristics curves were plotted for 30-d mortality and serious morbidity (defined as deep surgical site infection, dehiscence, unplanned intubation, failure to wean from the ventilator 48-h postoperatively, acute renal failure, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sepsis, septic shock, cerebrovascular accident, or reoperation) using mFI-5 and ASA classification. Areas under these curves (AUC) were compared. Ninety-two thousand, six hundred and ninety-one patients were studied. The mFI-5 and ASA were fair predictors of 30-d mortality (AUC 0.75 and 0.82, respectively) and good predictors of serious morbidity (AUC 0.61 and 0.64). After stratification by age, ASA was superior to mFI-5 in predicting mortality for patients aged 65, 70, 80 y, and older, for the entire population and for thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy separately. The ASA classification is a better predictor of mortality and serious morbidity than mFI-5 among patients undergoing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy and may be a better prognostic indicator to use when counseling patients before low-risk neck surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35339784
pii: S0022-4804(22)00115-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.044
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
83-91Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.