Simultaneous multislice steady-state free precession myocardial perfusion with full left ventricular coverage and high resolution at 1.5 T.
compressed sensing
myocardial perfusion
simultaneous multi-slice
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
15
02
2022
received:
15
07
2021
accepted:
22
02
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
entrez:
28
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To implement and evaluate a simultaneous multi-slice balanced SSFP (SMS-bSSFP) perfusion sequence and compressed sensing reconstruction for cardiac MR perfusion imaging with full left ventricular (LV) coverage (nine slices/heartbeat) and high spatial resolution (1.4 × 1.4 mm A preliminary study was performed to evaluate the performance of blipped controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (CAIPI) and RF-CAIPI with gradient-controlled local Larmor adjustment (GC-LOLA) in the presence of fat. A nine-slice SMS-bSSFP sequence using RF-CAIPI with GC-LOLA with high spatial resolution (1.4 × 1.4 mm Fat signal leakage was significantly higher for blipped CAIPI than for RF-CAIPI with GC-LOLA (7.9% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.010). All 10 SMS-bSSFP perfusion datasets resulted in 16/16 diagnostic myocardial segments. There were no significant differences between the SMS and conventional acquisitions in terms of image quality (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.2, p = 0.8) or perceived SNR (2.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.3). Inter-reader variability was good for both image quality (ICC = 0.84) and perceived SNR (ICC = 0.70). Myocardial sharpness was improved using the SMS sequence compared to the conventional sequence (0.37 ± 0.08 vs 0.32 ± 0.05, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between measurements of upslope index for the SMS and conventional sequences (0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.11 ± 0.03, p = 0.84). SMS-bSSFP with multiband factor 3 and compressed sensing reconstruction enables cardiac MR perfusion imaging with three-fold increased spatial coverage and improved myocardial sharpness compared to a conventional sequence, without compromising perceived SNR, image quality, upslope index or number of diagnostic segments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35344593
doi: 10.1002/mrm.29229
pmc: PMC9310832
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663-675Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/19/11/34243
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT 203148/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 10;20(1):84
pubmed: 30526627
Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2016-24
pubmed: 22677136
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 11;14(2):e0211738
pubmed: 30742641
Acad Radiol. 2019 Apr;26(4):519-525
pubmed: 29887399
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jul;20(1):39-45
pubmed: 15221807
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Aug;86(2):648-662
pubmed: 33709415
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 25;57(4):437-44
pubmed: 21251584
Magn Reson Med. 2012 May;67(5):1210-24
pubmed: 21858868
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):129-139
pubmed: 30058197
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Aug;86(2):663-676
pubmed: 33749026
Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):493-500
pubmed: 18936311
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jun;83(6):2185-2196
pubmed: 31746055
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Sep;72(3):689-98
pubmed: 24123153
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Nov;54(5):1123-9
pubmed: 16217785
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Dec 11;10:57
pubmed: 19077220
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Dec;84(6):3103-3116
pubmed: 32530064
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 01;17:68
pubmed: 26231784
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):1202-10
pubmed: 12111967
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Aug;88(2):663-675
pubmed: 35344593
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jan;53(1):159-68
pubmed: 15690515
Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1379-83
pubmed: 10736280
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):14-22
pubmed: 24433707
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):569-79
pubmed: 17685447
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May 1;5(3):306-13
pubmed: 22499848
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Feb;81(2):852-862
pubmed: 30311689
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr;34(4):661-669
pubmed: 29197024
Circulation. 2003 Jul 29;108(4):432-7
pubmed: 12860910
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):
pubmed: 25596143
Magn Reson Med. 2021 May;85(5):2661-2671
pubmed: 33270946
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Jan 14;18:4
pubmed: 26767610
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17
pubmed: 32089132
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;7(4):647-54
pubmed: 24867884
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Mar;53(3):684-91
pubmed: 15723404
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):811-819
pubmed: 34179941
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May;6(5):600-9
pubmed: 23582358
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Feb 24;16:19
pubmed: 24565078
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;48(4):1129-1138
pubmed: 29603482
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jul 29;21(1):44
pubmed: 31352900
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):339-48
pubmed: 23512780
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Aug;7(4):298-307
pubmed: 16039910
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Sep;72(3):629-39
pubmed: 24123058
Circulation. 2008 Mar 11;117(10):1283-91
pubmed: 18268144
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Mar;23(3):315-22
pubmed: 16463299
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jun 09;14:34
pubmed: 22682016