Dynamic brain ADC variations over the cardiac cycle and their relation to tissue strain assessed with DENSE at high-field MRI.
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
brain pulsations
clearance
glymphatic
human physiology
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
revised:
10
12
2021
received:
28
06
2021
accepted:
08
02
2022
pubmed:
29
3
2022
medline:
30
4
2022
entrez:
28
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ADC of brain tissue slightly varies over the cardiac cycle. This variation could reflect physiology, including mixing of the interstitial fluid, relevant for brain waste clearance. However, it is known from cardiac diffusion imaging that tissue deformation by itself affects the magnitude of the MRI signal, leading to artificial ADC variations as well. This study investigates to what extent tissue deformation causes artificial ADC variations in the brain. We implemented a high-field MRI sequence with stimulated echo acquisition mode that simultaneously measures brain tissue deformation and ADC. Based on the measured tissue deformation, we simulated the artificial ADC variation by combining established theoretical frameworks and compared the results with the measured ADC variation. We acquired data in 8 healthy volunteers with diffusion weighting b = 300 and b = 1000 s/mm Apparent diffusion coefficient variation was largest in the feet-to-head direction and showed the largest deviation from the mean ADC at peak systole. Artificial ADC variation estimated from tissue deformation was 1.3 ± 0.37·10 Apparent diffusion coefficient variations in the brain likely largely reflect physiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35344595
doi: 10.1002/mrm.29209
pmc: PMC9315037
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
266-279Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Magn Reson B. 1996 Sep;112(3):253-8
pubmed: 8812913
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Sep;70(3):671-83
pubmed: 23008140
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Nov;44(5):731-6
pubmed: 11064408
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):308-18
pubmed: 17260370
Magn Reson Med. 1999 Aug;42(2):393-403
pubmed: 10440965
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):1016-1024
pubmed: 30353860
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116581
pubmed: 31982580
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Apr;53(4):1200-1207
pubmed: 33112007
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118078
pubmed: 33878376
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Dec;24(6):1432-8
pubmed: 17096392
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):560-5
pubmed: 21900622
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 05;9(9):e107159
pubmed: 25191900
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Nov;60(5):1256-60
pubmed: 18956422
Radiol Phys Technol. 2009 Jul;2(2):133-7
pubmed: 20821111
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Jul;88(1):266-279
pubmed: 35344595
Magn Reson Med. 1994 Jul;32(1):116-20
pubmed: 8084226
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 15;187:56-67
pubmed: 29277647
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:126-133
pubmed: 29229579
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):196-205
pubmed: 19923044
NMR Biomed. 2019 Feb;32(2):e4050
pubmed: 30575151
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Dec;34(6):786-91
pubmed: 8598805
Radiology. 1989 Jun;171(3):841-5
pubmed: 2717762
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Jul;34(1):65-73
pubmed: 7674900
Elife. 2018 Jul 31;7:
pubmed: 30063207
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e72856
pubmed: 24023649
J Phys E. 1978 Mar;11(3):217-21
pubmed: 641846
J Magn Reson. 1999 Mar;137(1):247-52
pubmed: 10053155
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jan;77(1):273-284
pubmed: 26787007
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 7;56(13):N153-64
pubmed: 21654044