Effect of high-flow nasal therapy on patient-centred outcomes in patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a study protocol for a multicentre adaptive randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 24 06 2021
accepted: 16 03 2022
entrez: 29 3 2022
pubmed: 30 3 2022
medline: 31 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

High-flow nasal therapy is a non-invasive form of respiratory support that delivers low-level, flow dependent positive airway pressure. The device can be better tolerated by patients than alternatives such as continuous positive airway pressure. The primary objective is to determine if prophylactic high-flow nasal therapy after tracheal extubation can result in an increase in the number of days alive and at home within the first 90 days after surgery, when compared with standard oxygen therapy. The co-primary objective is to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of high-flow nasal therapy vs standard oxygen therapy at 90 days, from the view-point of the public sector, the health service and patients. This is an adaptive, multicentre, international parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with embedded cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the use of high-flow nasal therapy with control in patients at high risk of respiratory complications following cardiac surgery. Participants will be randomised before tracheal extubation and allocated either high-flow nasal therapy or standard oxygen therapy for a minimum of 16 h immediately post extubation. Participants will be followed up until 90 days after surgery. The total sample size needed to detect a 2-day increase in DAH90 with 90% power with an intention to treat analysis is 850 patients. The adaptive design includes an interim sample size re-estimation which will provide protection against deviations from the original sample size assumptions made from the single-centre pilot study and will allow for a maximum sample size increase to 1152 patients. Evidence to support routine use of high-flow nasal therapy will inform the development of effective enhanced recovery care bundles. Reducing complications should reduce length of stay and re-admission to hospital and provide an important focus for cost reduction. However; high-quality studies evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of high-flow nasal therapy after cardiothoracic surgery are lacking. The study has been registered with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN14092678 , 13/05/2020) Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Pending.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
High-flow nasal therapy is a non-invasive form of respiratory support that delivers low-level, flow dependent positive airway pressure. The device can be better tolerated by patients than alternatives such as continuous positive airway pressure. The primary objective is to determine if prophylactic high-flow nasal therapy after tracheal extubation can result in an increase in the number of days alive and at home within the first 90 days after surgery, when compared with standard oxygen therapy. The co-primary objective is to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of high-flow nasal therapy vs standard oxygen therapy at 90 days, from the view-point of the public sector, the health service and patients.
METHODS METHODS
This is an adaptive, multicentre, international parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with embedded cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the use of high-flow nasal therapy with control in patients at high risk of respiratory complications following cardiac surgery. Participants will be randomised before tracheal extubation and allocated either high-flow nasal therapy or standard oxygen therapy for a minimum of 16 h immediately post extubation. Participants will be followed up until 90 days after surgery. The total sample size needed to detect a 2-day increase in DAH90 with 90% power with an intention to treat analysis is 850 patients. The adaptive design includes an interim sample size re-estimation which will provide protection against deviations from the original sample size assumptions made from the single-centre pilot study and will allow for a maximum sample size increase to 1152 patients.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Evidence to support routine use of high-flow nasal therapy will inform the development of effective enhanced recovery care bundles. Reducing complications should reduce length of stay and re-admission to hospital and provide an important focus for cost reduction. However; high-quality studies evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of high-flow nasal therapy after cardiothoracic surgery are lacking.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
The study has been registered with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN14092678 , 13/05/2020) Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Pending.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35346339
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06180-5
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06180-5
pmc: PMC8959074
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

232

Subventions

Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CH/12/1/29419
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR128351
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/17/9/32812
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : national institute of health research
ID : 128351

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, Chikwe J, Adams DH. Predictors and early and late outcomes of respiratory failure in contemporary cardiac surgery. Chest. 2008;133(3):713–21. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-1028 .
doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1028 pubmed: 18263692
Westerlind A, Nilsson F, Ricksten SE. The use of continuous positive airway pressure by face mask and thoracic epidural analgesia after lung transplantation. Gothenburg Lung Transplant Group. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13(3):249–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-0770(99)90258-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S1053-0770(99)90258-6 pubmed: 10392672
Frizzola M, Miller TL, Rodriguez ME, Zhu Y, Rojas J, Hesek A, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.21326 .
doi: 10.1002/ppul.21326 pubmed: 21171186
Parke R, McGuinness S, Eccleston M. Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(6):886–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep280 .
doi: 10.1093/bja/aep280 pubmed: 19846404 pmcid: 2777940
Parke RL, Eccleston ML, McGuinness SP. The effects of flow on airway pressure during nasal high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care. 2011;56(8):1151–5. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01106 .
doi: 10.4187/respcare.01106 pubmed: 21496369
Jabbari A, Alijanpour E, Tabasi S. Clinical usage of high-flow oxygenation in postcardiac surgery patients. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):107–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_7_18 .
doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_7_18 pubmed: 30648693 pmcid: 6350429
Cuquemelle E, Lellouche F. Assessment of humidification performance: still no easy method! Respir Care. 2013;58(9):1559–61. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02761 .
doi: 10.4187/respcare.02761 pubmed: 23981591
Noss C, Prusinkiewicz C, Nelson G, Patel PA, Augoustides JG, Gregory AJ. Enhanced recovery for cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(6):2760–70. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.045 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.045 pubmed: 29503121
Fleming IO, Garratt C, Guha R, Desai J, Chaubey S, Wang Y, et al. Aggregation of marginal gains in cardiac surgery: feasibility of a perioperative care bundle for enhanced recovery in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(3):665–70. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.017 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.017 pubmed: 27321791
Richens D. Cardiothoracic Surgery GIRFT Programme National Speciality Report 2018. Getting it right the first time; Available from: https://www.gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/GIRFT-Cardiothoracic-Report-1.pdf2018 . [Accessed on 16 Apr 2019]
Zochios V, Collier T, Blaudszun G, Butchart A, Earwaker M, Jones N, et al. The effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on hospital length of stay in cardiac surgical patients at high risk for respiratory complications: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(12):1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14345 .
doi: 10.1111/anae.14345 pubmed: 30019747 pmcid: 6282568
Luengo-Fernández R, Leal J, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Cost of cardiovascular diseases in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2006;92(10):1384–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.072173 .
doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072173 pubmed: 16702172 pmcid: 1861058
Eaton Turner E, Jenks M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in intensive care units in NHS England. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;18(3):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2018.1411804 .
doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1411804 pubmed: 29187008
The National Insitute of Cardivasular Outcomes Research. National Audit Cardiac Surgery Audit 2014-2017 Summary report 2014-2017 [updated 2018]. Available from: https://www.nicor.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Adult-Cardiac-Surgery-Summary-Report-2014-17.pdf2018 . [Accessed on 2 May 2019]
Hyder JA, Hirschberg RE, Nguyen LL. Home discharge as a performance metric for surgery. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):96–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1725 .
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1725 pubmed: 25472699
Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Pelosi P. Gama de Abreu M, Møller AM, Canet J, et al. A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(5):1066–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007 pubmed: 29661384
Rogers CA, Pike K, Angelini GD, Reeves BC, Glauber M, Ferrarini M, et al. An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(2):306–16.e1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.020
Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564 .
doi: 10.1002/hec.3564 pubmed: 28833869
Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkw060 .
doi: 10.1093/bjaed/mkw060
Shulman MA, Myles PS, Chan MT, McIlroy DR, Wallace S, Ponsford J. Measurement of disability-free survival after surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(3):524–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000586 .
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000586 pubmed: 25689757
British Thoracic Society. British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British Guideline on the management of asthma. A national clinical guideline, London. 2014. Available from: https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/clinical-information/asthma/btssign-asthma-guideline-2014/2014 [Accessed on 17 April 2019]
Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S, Wallace S, McIlroy DR, McCluskey S, et al. Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e015828. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828 pubmed: 28821518 pmcid: 5629653
The National Insitute of Health and Care Excellance (NICE). NICE Position statement on the EQ-5D-5L. 2017. Available from: https://euroqol.org/NICE-POSITION-STATEMENT-ON-THE-EQ-5D-5L/2017 . [Accessed on 18 April 2019]
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–89. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca .
doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca pubmed: 23652265
Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. Clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2012;2(1):1–138.
doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.1
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038 pubmed: 30153967
Anisimov V. Predictive modelling of recruitment and drug supply in multicenter clinical trials. Conference paper. Biopharmaceutical Section JSM. 2009.
Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, et al. The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. Trials. 2020;21(1):528. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x .
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x pubmed: 32546273 pmcid: 7298968
van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 pubmed: 22867780
Personal Social Service Research Unit (PSSR). Unit costs of health and social care professionals 2018 Available from: https://www.pssru.ac.uk/2018 . [Accessed on 3 May 2019]
Williams R, Rankin N, Smith T, Galler D, Seakins P. Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of the airway mucosa. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(11):1920–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199611000-00025 .
doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00025 pubmed: 8917046

Auteurs

Melissa Earwaker (M)

Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK. melissa.earwaker@nhs.net.

Sofia Villar (S)

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.

Julia Fox-Rushby (J)

King's College London, London, UK.

Melissa Duckworth (M)

Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Sarah Dawson (S)

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.

Jo Steele (J)

Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Yi-da Chiu (YD)

Papworth Trials Unit, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Edward Litton (E)

Intensive Care Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Gudrun Kunst (G)

King's College London, London, UK.

Gavin Murphy (G)

University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Guillermo Martinez (G)

Papworth Trials Unit, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Vasileios Zochios (V)

University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Val Brown (V)

Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Geoff Brown (G)

Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Andrew Klein (A)

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH