Self-reported mental health status of pregnant women in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.
Anxiety
COVID-19
Depression
Mental health
Perinatal care
Pregnancy
Stress
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2022
28 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
03
09
2021
accepted:
08
03
2022
entrez:
30
3
2022
pubmed:
31
3
2022
medline:
5
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to unprecedented worries and challenges for pregnant women due to social restrictions and changes in maternity care provision. We aimed to investigate the mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women in Sweden and explore factors associated with poor perinatal mental health in this specific context. This was a nation-wide cross-sectional survey of pregnant women living in Sweden. Validated questionnaires were distributed through non-profit organizations´ websites and social media channels from May 2020 to February 2021. Perinatal depression, anxiety, and acute stress reaction were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Impact Event Scale (Revised) (IES-R), respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics and self-perceived mental well-being were also obtained. Factors associated with mental health outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression model. Among a total of 470 participants, 43.2% (n = 203) reported depression (EPDS ≥13), 25.7% (n = 121) moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 10), and 23.7% (n = 110) moderate to severe acute stress reaction (IES-R ≥ 33). 27.4% participants (n = 129) expressed concerns regarding their mental well-being during the pandemic. Pregnant mothers who had sick family members reported poorer mental health outcomes than those who did not (median [Interquartile range (IQR)] EPDS scores: 14.0 [8.75-18.0] vs 11.0 [6.25-15.0], p < .001; median (IQR) GAD7 scores: 7.0 [4.0-12.25] vs 6.0 [3.0-9.0], p = .003); median (IQR) IES-R scores: 20.0 [9.0-38.0] vs 15.0 [7.0-30.0], p = .048). Logistic regression analyses revealed that risk factors for poor mental health outcomes were having a sick family member with any illness, unemployment, and experiencing a substantially stressful life event. Having a higher educational level and a younger age during the pandemic were protective. Depression and anxiety were highly prevalent among pregnant women in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating a need for professional mental health support for this vulnerable group of population. Unemployment was an associated risk factor whereas younger age and higher educational level were protective suggesting an important role of socio-economic factors in modulating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to unprecedented worries and challenges for pregnant women due to social restrictions and changes in maternity care provision. We aimed to investigate the mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women in Sweden and explore factors associated with poor perinatal mental health in this specific context.
METHOD
METHODS
This was a nation-wide cross-sectional survey of pregnant women living in Sweden. Validated questionnaires were distributed through non-profit organizations´ websites and social media channels from May 2020 to February 2021. Perinatal depression, anxiety, and acute stress reaction were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Impact Event Scale (Revised) (IES-R), respectively. Sociodemographic characteristics and self-perceived mental well-being were also obtained. Factors associated with mental health outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among a total of 470 participants, 43.2% (n = 203) reported depression (EPDS ≥13), 25.7% (n = 121) moderate to severe anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 10), and 23.7% (n = 110) moderate to severe acute stress reaction (IES-R ≥ 33). 27.4% participants (n = 129) expressed concerns regarding their mental well-being during the pandemic. Pregnant mothers who had sick family members reported poorer mental health outcomes than those who did not (median [Interquartile range (IQR)] EPDS scores: 14.0 [8.75-18.0] vs 11.0 [6.25-15.0], p < .001; median (IQR) GAD7 scores: 7.0 [4.0-12.25] vs 6.0 [3.0-9.0], p = .003); median (IQR) IES-R scores: 20.0 [9.0-38.0] vs 15.0 [7.0-30.0], p = .048). Logistic regression analyses revealed that risk factors for poor mental health outcomes were having a sick family member with any illness, unemployment, and experiencing a substantially stressful life event. Having a higher educational level and a younger age during the pandemic were protective.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Depression and anxiety were highly prevalent among pregnant women in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating a need for professional mental health support for this vulnerable group of population. Unemployment was an associated risk factor whereas younger age and higher educational level were protective suggesting an important role of socio-economic factors in modulating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35351030
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04553-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-022-04553-x
pmc: PMC8960205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
260Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Oct;9:7-13
pubmed: 27634658
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):
pubmed: 32895217
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):813-824
pubmed: 32682460
Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
pubmed: 472086
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 May;28(4):402-9
pubmed: 24726240
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Feb;34(2):178-187
pubmed: 28098957
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;66(4):317-320
pubmed: 32233719
Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;65(6):414-8
pubmed: 21728782
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jun;131(1-3):277-83
pubmed: 21269708
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021 Dec;24(6):1027-1036
pubmed: 34159467
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:617001
pubmed: 33324308
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):817-818
pubmed: 32374420
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:765-774
pubmed: 32736186
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e759-e772
pubmed: 33811827
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Aug;24(6):618-22
pubmed: 20434306
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Nov;44(7):688-694
pubmed: 27562827
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 18;18(1):10
pubmed: 33461593
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Dec;23(6):779-782
pubmed: 32844329
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;37(8):854-856
pubmed: 32276282
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Jun;17(3):221-8
pubmed: 24442712
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
J Affect Disord. 2017 Oct 15;221:56-64
pubmed: 28628768
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Oct;25:100516
pubmed: 32434139
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005 Jun;8(2):97-104
pubmed: 15883652
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Sep;100(9):1611-1619
pubmed: 33885150
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):240.e1-240.e9
pubmed: 32437665
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):848-855
pubmed: 32449178
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;20(2):173-93
pubmed: 24068751
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 24;18(5):
pubmed: 33668235
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 Apr;111(4):291-9
pubmed: 15740465