APYRASE1/2 mediate red light-induced de-etiolation growth in Arabidopsis seedlings.


Journal

Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 06 2022
Historique:
received: 14 12 2021
accepted: 07 03 2022
pubmed: 1 4 2022
medline: 30 6 2022
entrez: 31 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In etiolated seedlings, red light (R) activates phytochrome and initiates signals that generate major changes at molecular and physiological levels. These changes include inhibition of hypocotyl growth and promotion of the growth of primary roots, apical hooks, and cotyledons. An earlier report showed that the sharp decrease in hypocotyl growth rapidly induced by R was accompanied by an equally rapid decrease in the transcript and protein levels of two closely related apyrases (APYs; nucleoside triphosphate-diphosphohydrolases) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), APY1 and APY2, enzymes whose expression alters auxin transport and growth in seedlings. Here, we report that single knockouts of either APY inhibit R-induced promotion of the growth of primary roots, apical hooks, and cotyledons, and RNAi-induced suppression of APY1 expression in the background of apy2 inhibits R-induced apical hook opening. When R-irradiated primary roots and apical hook-cotyledons began to show a gradual increase in their growth relative to dark controls, they concurrently showed increased levels of APY protein, but in hook-cotyledon tissue, this occurred without parallel increases in their transcripts. In wild-type seedlings whose root growth is suppressed by the photosynthesis inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, the R-induced increased APY expression in roots was also inhibited. In unirradiated plants, the constitutive expression of APY2 promoted both hook opening and changes in the transcript abundance of Small Auxin Upregulated RNA (SAUR), SAUR17 and SAUR50 that help mediate de-etiolation. These results provide evidence that the expression of APY1/APY2 is regulated by R and that APY1/APY2 participate in the signaling pathway by which phytochrome induces differential growth changes in different tissues of etiolated seedlings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35357495
pii: 6561548
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac150
pmc: PMC9237676
doi:

Substances chimiques

Arabidopsis Proteins 0
Indoleacetic Acids 0
Phytochrome 11121-56-5
APY1 protein, Arabidopsis EC 3.6.1.5
APY2 protein, Arabidopsis EC 3.6.1.5
Apyrase EC 3.6.1.5

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1728-1740

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists.

Références

Plant Cell. 2014 Jan;26(1):56-78
pubmed: 24481072
Plant Cell Environ. 2019 Jan;42(1):337-353
pubmed: 30132918
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2021 Jun 17;72:217-244
pubmed: 33756095
Plant Cell. 2011 Oct;23(10):3610-26
pubmed: 21972261
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 23;22(6):
pubmed: 33807069
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Nov 05;4:441
pubmed: 24204373
Plant Physiol. 2003 Apr;131(4):1638-47
pubmed: 12692323
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86:9866-70
pubmed: 11537413
Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):1092-109
pubmed: 18480378
Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Feb;46(2):317-23
pubmed: 15695459
Plant Sci. 2014 Aug;225:107-16
pubmed: 25017166
Plant Physiol. 2012 Dec;160(4):1985-95
pubmed: 23071251
Plant Cell. 2020 Dec;32(12):3792-3811
pubmed: 33093148
Plant Physiol. 2018 Feb;176(2):1049-1060
pubmed: 28939624
Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Aug;64(6):657-72
pubmed: 17534719
Mol Syst Biol. 2012 Jan 17;8:566
pubmed: 22252389
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Nov 14;19(11):
pubmed: 30441766
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1335-40
pubmed: 22232680
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6071-6
pubmed: 27118848
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11217-21
pubmed: 22733756
Plant Physiol. 2015 Sep;169(1):530-48
pubmed: 26224801
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Nov 23;96(24):14142-6
pubmed: 10570212
Plant Physiol. 2009 Apr;149(4):1632-7
pubmed: 19211697
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr;164(4):2054-67
pubmed: 24550243
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jun;144(2):961-75
pubmed: 17434987
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6451-6456
pubmed: 30850529
Plant Cell. 2019 May;31(5):1155-1170
pubmed: 30914467
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009 Dec;1(6):a001586
pubmed: 20457562
Plant Physiol. 2011 Apr;155(4):1988-98
pubmed: 21346172
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Apr 11;7:480
pubmed: 27148307

Auteurs

Gayani Weeraratne (G)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Huan Wang (H)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Tharindu P Weeraratne (TP)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Tanya Sabharwal (T)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Han-Wei Jiang (HW)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Araceli Cantero (A)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Greg Clark (G)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Stanley J Roux (SJ)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Articles similaires

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
Glycine max Photoperiod Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Flowers Gene Expression Regulation, Plant

Classifications MeSH