Fibular registration using surface matching in navigation-guided osteotomies: a proof of concept study on 3D-printed models.
Bone surface matching
Computer-assisted surgery
Fibula flap
Fibula registration
Mandibular reconstruction
Navigation
Journal
International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
ISSN: 1861-6429
Titre abrégé: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101499225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
18
09
2021
accepted:
10
03
2022
pubmed:
5
4
2022
medline:
22
6
2022
entrez:
4
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fibula free flap is currently used in mandibular reconstruction. The main difficulties involved in this surgery concern mandible shaping and therefore, osteotomy positioning on the fibula. The use of navigation could help in osteotomy positioning, but accurate registration is required. We assess a surface-matching method for fibula registration that relies on an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Since the fibula shape is landmark free, a robust registration initialization approach is used to avoid non-optimal local minimums in the ICP. Bone surface-matching registration was evaluated on a 3D printed fibula and compared to its virtual reference model. The registration initialization relied on 3 initialization points placed on the surgically exposed area, geometrically remote from the fibular distal extremity. The bone surface was digitized, and the obtained point clouds were registered to the virtual reference model. The position of 3 assessment points engraved on the 3D printed fibula was then compared to that of the equivalent points on the virtual model. The registration procedure was performed 24 times by an expert surgeon. Seventy-two target registration errors (TRE) were computed, corresponding to the distance between the paired assessment points. Most TRE (86.1%) were less than 1 mm, with a maximum of 1.552 mm. The overall mean value was 0.759 ± 0.302 mm. This study illustrates a surface-matching approach for fibula registration, with an initialization method based on points remote from the fibula distal extremity. This registration technique gave promising results and should be considered as a valid registration method for straight bones like the fibula. These findings indicate that navigation can be used for fibula flap shaping for mandibular reconstruction, with a noninvasive and accurate registration method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35377035
doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02608-0
pii: 10.1007/s11548-022-02608-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1321-1331Informations de copyright
© 2022. CARS.
Références
Hidalgo DA (1989) Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):71–79
doi: 10.1097/00006534-198907000-00014
Moro A, Cannas R, Boniello R, Gasparini G, Pelo S (2009) Techniques on modeling the vascularized free fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 20(5):1571–1573. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b0db5c
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b0db5c
pubmed: 19816298
Thankappan K, Trivedi NP, Subash P, Pullara SK, Peter S, Kuriakose MA, Subramania I (2008) Three-dimensional computed tomography-based contouring of a free fibula bone graft for mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(10):2185–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.035
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.035
pubmed: 18848124
Blackwell KE, Brown MT, Gonzalez D (1997) Overcoming the learning curve in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(12):1332–1335. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900120082013
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900120082013
pubmed: 9413363
Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X (2016) Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121(2):139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.005
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.005
pubmed: 26792754
Bosc R, Hersant B, Carloni R, Niddam J, Bouhassira J, De Kermadec H, Bequignon E, Wojcik T, Julieron M, Meningaud J-P (2017) Mandibular reconstruction after cancer: an in-house approach to manufacturing cutting guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.004
pubmed: 27815013
Bao T, He J, Yu C, Zhao W, Lin Y, Wang H, Liu J, Zhu H (2017) Utilization of a pre-bent plate-positioning surgical guide system in precise mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap. Oral Oncol 75:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.11.011
pubmed: 29224810
Li P, Xuan M, Liao C, Tang W, Wang X-Y, Tian W, Long J (2016) Application of intraoperative navigation for the reconstruction of mandibular defects with microvascular fibular flaps-preliminary clinical experiences. J Craniofac Surg 27(3):751–755. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002430
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002430
pubmed: 27159859
Zhou C, Anschuetz L, Weder S, Xie L, Caversaccio M, Weber S, Williamson T (2016) Surface matching for high-accuracy registration of the lateral skull base. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(11):2097–2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1394-3
doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1394-3
pubmed: 27142458
Shan X-F, Chen H-M, Liang J, Huang J-W, Zhang L, Cai Z-G, Guo C (2016) Surgical navigation-assisted mandibular reconstruction with fibula flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(4):448–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.1006
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.1006
pubmed: 26723498
Yu Y, Zhang W-B, Liu X-J, Guo C-B, Yu G-Y, Peng X (2016) A new procedure assisted by digital techniques for secondary mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2009–2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003096
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003096
pubmed: 28005744
Shen S-Y, Yu Y, Zhang W-B, Liu X-J, Peng X (2017) Angle-to-angle mandibular defect reconstruction with fibula flap by using a mandibular fixation device and surgical navigation. J Craniofac Surg 28(6):1486–1491. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003891
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003891
pubmed: 28749839
Pietruski P, Majak M, Światek-Najwer E, Żuk M, Popek M, Mazurek M, Świecka M, Jaworowski J (2019) Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: a proof of concept study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 72(4):572–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.026
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.026
pubmed: 30803870
Luebbers H-T, Messmer P, Obwegeser JA, Zwahlen RA, Kikinis R, Graetz KW, Matthews F (2008) Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxfac Surg 36(2):109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.002
Strong EB, Tollefson TT (2013) Intraoperative use of CT imaging. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 46(5):719–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2013.07.003
doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.07.003
pubmed: 24138733
3D Slicer (2021) 3D Slicer image computing platform. https://www.slicer.org/
Yaniv Z (2015) Which pivot calibration? Medical imaging: image-guided procedures. Robot Interv Model. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2081348
doi: 10.1117/12.2081348
CloudCompare (2022) Open Source project [Internet]. http://www.cloudcompare.org/ . Accessed 9 March 2022
Jones MW, Baerentzen JA, Sramek M (2006) 3D distance fields: a survey of techniques and applications. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graphics 12(4):581–599. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.56
doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2006.56
Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
doi: 10.1109/34.121791
Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R (1998) Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graphics Forum 17(2):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00236
doi: 10.1111/1467-8659.00236
Girardeau-Montaut D (2006) Détection de changement sur des données géométriques tridimensionnelles Dissertation, Paris, ENST. https://www.theses.fr/2006ENST0005 .
Distances Computation (2021) CloudCompareWiki [Internet] Available from: http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Distances_Computation . Accessed 9 March 2022
Kamio T, Hayashi K, Onda T, Takaki T, Shibahara T, Yakushiji T, Shibui T, Kato H (2018) Utilizing a low-cost desktop 3D printer to develop a ‘one-stop 3D printing lab’ for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields. 3D Print Med 4(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-018-0028-5
doi: 10.1186/s41205-018-0028-5
pubmed: 30148203
pmcid: 6097791
Damecourt A, Nieto N, Galmiche S, Garrel R, de Boutray M (2020) In-house 3D treatment planning for mandibular reconstruction by free fibula flap in cancer: our technique. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 137(6):501–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2020.02.002
doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.02.002
pubmed: 32139198
Yuan X, Xuan M, Tian W, Long J (2016) Application of digital surgical guides in mandibular resection and reconstruction with fibula flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(11):1406–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.06.022
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.06.022
pubmed: 27448991
Rommel N, Kesting MR, Rohleder NH, Bauer FMJ, Wolff K-D, Weitz J (2017) Mandible reconstruction with free fibula flaps: outcome of a cost-effective individual planning concept compared with virtual surgical planning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45(8):1246–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.010
pubmed: 28606440
Widmann G, Stoffner R, Bale R (2009) Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107(5):701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.011
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.011
pubmed: 19426922
Lefèvre E, Farlay D, Bala Y, Subtil F, Wolfram U, Rizzo S, Baron C, Zysset P, Pithioux M, Follet H (2019) Compositional and mechanical properties of growing cortical bone tissue: a study of the human fibula. Sci Rep 9:17629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54016-1
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54016-1
pubmed: 31772277
pmcid: 6879611
Fusion track 500 (2021) Actrasys measurement products [Internet]. Available from: https://www.atracsys-measurement.com/products/fusiontrack-500 . Accessed 9 March 2022
Evans NS, Ratchford EV (2016) The swollen leg. Vasc Med 21(6):562–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X16672576
doi: 10.1177/1358863X16672576
pubmed: 27738281
Perrin M, Guex JJ (2000) Edema and leg volume: methods of assessment. Angiology 51(1):9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/000331970005100103
doi: 10.1177/000331970005100103
pubmed: 10667637