Platelet reactivity testing in peripheral artery disease.


Journal

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
ISSN: 1535-2900
Titre abrégé: Am J Health Syst Pharm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9503023

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 6 4 2022
medline: 9 8 2022
entrez: 5 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Oral antiplatelet therapy is routinely used to prevent adverse cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Several laboratory tests are available to quantify the degree of platelet inhibition following antiplatelet therapy. This article aims to provide a review of the literature surrounding platelet functional testing in patients with PAD receiving oral P2Y12 inhibitors and to offer guidance to clinicians for the use and interpretation of these tests. A literature search of PubMed and the Web of Science Core Collection database was conducted. All studies that performed platelet function testing and reported clinical outcomes in patients with PAD were included. Evaluation of the data suggests that, among the available testing strategies, the VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit (PRU) test is the most widely used. Despite numerous investigations attempting to define a laboratory threshold indicating suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapy, controversy exists about which PRU value best correlates with cardiovascular outcomes (ie, mortality, stent thrombosis, etc). In the PAD literature, the most commonly used PRU thresholds are 208 or higher and 235 or higher. Nonetheless, adjusting antiplatelet regimens based on suboptimal P2Y12 reactivity values has yet to be proven useful in reducing the incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This review examines platelet function testing in patients with PAD and discusses the interpretation and application of these tests when monitoring the safety and efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitors. Although platelet functional tests may be simple to use, clinical trials thus far have failed to show benefit from therapy adjustments based on test results. Clinicians should be cautioned against relying on this test result alone and should instead consider a combination of laboratory, clinical, and patient-specific factors when adjusting P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35381075
pii: 6563940
doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac095
doi:

Substances chimiques

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors 0
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists 0
Clopidogrel A74586SNO7
Ticlopidine OM90ZUW7M1

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1312-1322

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Youqi Zhang (Y)

Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Jennifer W Chou (JW)

Department of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Wan-Ting Huang (WT)

Department of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Katrina Derry (K)

Department of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Doug Humber (D)

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH