Accuracy of the doses computed by the Eclipse treatment planning system near and inside metal elements.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 04 2022
08 04 2022
Historique:
received:
27
01
2022
accepted:
25
03
2022
entrez:
9
4
2022
pubmed:
10
4
2022
medline:
13
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metal artefacts degrade clinical image quality which decreases the confidence of using computed tomography (CT) for the delineation of key structures for treatment planning and leads to dose errors in affected areas. In this work, we investigated accuracy of doses computed by the Eclipse treatment planning system near and inside metallic elements for two different computation algorithms. An impact of CT metal artefact reduction methods on the resulting calculated doses has also been assessed. A water phantom including Gafchromic film and metal inserts was irradiated (max dose 5 Gy) using a 6 MV photon beam. Three materials were tested: titanium, alloy 600, and tungsten. The phantom CT images were obtained with the pseudo-monoenergetic reconstruction (PMR) and the iterative metal artefact reduction (iMAR). Image sets were used for dose calculation using an Eclipse treatment planning station (TPS). Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to predict the true dose distribution in the phantom allowing for comparison with doses measured by film and calculated by TPS. Measured and simulated percentage depth doses (PDDs) were not statistically different (p > 0.618). Regional differences were observed at edges of metallic objects (max 8% difference). However, PDDs simulated with and without film were statistically different (p < 0.002). PDDs calculated by the Acuros XB algorithm based on the dose-to-medium approach best matched the MC reference regardless of the CT reconstruction methods and inserts used (p > 0.078). PDDs obtained using other algorithms significantly differ from the MC values (p < 0.011). The Acuros XB algorithm with a dose-to-medium approach provides reliable dose calculation in all metal regions when using the Varian system. The inability of the AAA algorithm to model backscatter dose significantly limits its clinical application in the presence of metal. No significant impact on the dose calculation was found for a range of metal artefact reduction strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35396569
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10072-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-10072-8
pmc: PMC8993896
doi:
Substances chimiques
Metals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5974Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):131-41
pubmed: 26723553
Phys Med. 2019 Jul;63:48-55
pubmed: 31221408
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Oct;13(5):549-562
pubmed: 34759980
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011702
pubmed: 24387494
Med Phys. 2011 Jul;38(7):4018-24
pubmed: 21858999
Med Phys. 2015 Mar;42(3):1170-83
pubmed: 25735272
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jun;159:106-111
pubmed: 33741471
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Dec;43(12):1729-35
pubmed: 25172218
Med Phys. 2003 Jun;30(6):1162-82
pubmed: 12852541
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 May;18(3):9-15
pubmed: 28317312
Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2651-64
pubmed: 21776802
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 08;17(3):475-485
pubmed: 27167252
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5117
pubmed: 27587042
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Jun;90:101907
pubmed: 33845433
Acad Radiol. 2011 Oct;18(10):1252-7
pubmed: 21893293
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143584
pubmed: 26600188
Phys Med. 2020 Sep;77:92-99
pubmed: 32818774
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 08;17(6):179-188
pubmed: 27929492
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1533033819892255
pubmed: 31789113
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Mar 04;14(2):4111
pubmed: 23470940
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 08;16(5):142–158
pubmed: 26699322
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08;15(5):4912
pubmed: 25207577
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 04;9:43
pubmed: 24491230
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Apr 12;12(3):3505
pubmed: 21844864
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):011707
pubmed: 23298077
Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1679-91
pubmed: 15537976
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 14;16:61-68
pubmed: 33458345
Phys Med. 2013 Nov;29(6):599-606
pubmed: 23107430
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):195-209
pubmed: 28834214
Radiographics. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):791-803
pubmed: 17495293
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):237-44
pubmed: 23513244
Med Phys. 2020 Dec;47(12):5986-6025
pubmed: 32990328