Genomic testing among patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: A contemporary clinical practice patterns study.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ diagnosis
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Genetic Testing
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ genetics
United States
/ epidemiology
Gene expression profiling
Genetic information databases
Next-generation sequencing
Non-small cell lung cancer
Targeted molecular therapy
Tumor biomarker
Journal
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-8332
Titre abrégé: Lung Cancer
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8800805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
21
10
2021
revised:
20
01
2022
accepted:
30
01
2022
pubmed:
10
4
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
entrez:
9
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
According to 2018 United States and international lung cancer and pathology guidelines, testing of EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and BRAF genes is a minimum requirement to identify targeted therapy options in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). We describe real-world use and clinical features of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and other non-NGS testing technologies in these patients. Patients were from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database and were newly diagnosed with non-squamous aNSCLC between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2019. We describe occurrence and patterns of NGS- (including comprehensive genomic profiling [CGP]) and non-NGS-based genomic testing before the start of first-line therapy, unsuccessful genotyping (<4 genes tested) and incidence of potentially missed targeted therapy options (<4 genes tested with no positive results). Among 3050 patients, 2356 received any type of genomic testing (NGS: 1406 [59.7%]). Unsuccessful genotyping occurred in 13.2% and 52.2% of NGS- and non-NGS-tested patients, respectively. Among NGS-tested patients, 10.0% had a potentially missed targeted therapy option (CGP: 2.9%), compared with 40.2% in the non-NGS tested group. While all four guideline-recommended genes were tested in ≥ 92% of patients who had NGS testing, when only non-NGS testing was used, although EGFR and ALK had similarly high testing proportions, BRAF and ROS1 (56.1% and 83.7%, respectively) were examined less often. Our findings suggest that in aNSCLC clinical practice, NGS testing may help to avoid potentially missed targeted therapy options and improve testing uptake for recently approved biomarkers. Results therefore support the use of guideline-recommended broad-panel NGS testing in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35397297
pii: S0169-5002(22)00036-8
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.021
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
0
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-48Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.