Quantifying intraventricular drug delivery utilizing programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts as the intraventricular access device.
Brain tumor
Drug delivery
Intraventricular
Peritoneal
Thecal
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2022
accepted:
17
03
2022
pubmed:
12
4
2022
medline:
10
5
2022
entrez:
11
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts (pVP shunts) are increasingly utilized for intraventricular chemotherapy, radioimmunotherapy, and/or cellular therapy. Shunt adjustments allow optimization of drug concentrations in the thecal space with minimization in the peritoneum. This report assesses the success of the pVP shunt as an access device for intraventricular therapies. Quantifying intrathecal drug delivery using scintigraphy by pVP shunt model has not been previously reported. We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis on patients with CNS tumors and pVP shunts from 2003 to 2020, noting shunt model. pVP flow was evaluated for consideration of compartmental radioimmunotherapy (cRIT) using In-111-DTPA scintigraphy. Scintigraphy studies at 2-4 h and at 24 h quantified ventricular-thecal and peritoneal drug activity. Twenty-two CSF flow studies were administered to 15 patients (N = 15) with diagnoses including medulloblastoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, pineoblastoma, and choroid plexus carcinoma. Six different types of pVP models were noted. 100% of the studies demonstrated ventriculo-thecal drug activity. 27% (6 of 22) of the studies had no peritoneal uptake visible by imaging. 73% (16 of 22) of the studies had minimal relative peritoneal uptake (< 12%). 27% (6 of 22) of the studies demonstrated moderate relative peritoneal uptake (12-37%). No studies demonstrated peritoneal uptake above 37%. All patients had successful drug delivery of In-111-DTPA to the ventriculo-thecal space. 73% of the patients had minimal relative (< 12%) peritoneal drug uptake. Though efficacy varies by shunt model, low numbers preclude conclusions regarding model superiority. CSF flow scintigraphy studies assesses drug distribution of In-111-DTPA, informing CSF flow for delivery of intraventricular therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35403968
doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03989-7
pii: 10.1007/s11060-022-03989-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pentetic Acid
7A314HQM0I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
457-463Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Belykh E, Shaffer KV, Lin C, Byvaltsev VA, Preul MC, Chen L (2020) Blood-brain barrier, blood-brain tumor barrier, and fluorescence-guided neurosurgical oncology: delivering optical labels to brain tumors. Front Oncol 10:739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00739
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00739
pubmed: 32582530
pmcid: 7290051
Pardridge WM (2005) The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx 2(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1602/neurorx.2.1.3
doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.3
pubmed: 15717053
pmcid: 539316
Burger MC, Wagner M, Franz K, Harter PN, Bahr O, Steinbach JP, Senft C (2018) Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with on-off values for intraventricular therapies in patients with communicating hydrocephalus due to leptomeningeal metastases. J Clin Med 7(8):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080216
doi: 10.3390/jcm7080216
pmcid: 6111529
Ferraris C, Cavalli R, Panciani PP, Battaglia L (2020) Overcoming the blood-brain barrier: successes and challenges in developing nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery systems for the treatment of brain tumours. Int J Nanomedicine 15:2999–3022. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S231479
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S231479
pubmed: 32431498
pmcid: 7201023
Hersh DS, Wadajkar AS, Roberts N, Perez JG, Connolly NP, Frenkel V, Winkles JA, Woodworth GF, Kim AJ (2016) Evolving drug delivery strategies to overcome the blood brain barrier. Curr Pharm Des 22(9):1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612822666151221150733
doi: 10.2174/1381612822666151221150733
pubmed: 26685681
pmcid: 4900538
Gholamrezanezhad A, Shooli H, Jokar N, Nemati R, Assadi M (2019) Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in brain tumors. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53(6):374–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00618-6
doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00618-6
pubmed: 31867072
pmcid: 6898703
Zada G, Chen TC (2010) A novel method for administering intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases and shunted hydrocephalus: case report. Oper Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000383138.78632
doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000383138.78632
Souweidane MM, Kramer K, Pandit-Taskar N, Zhou Z, Haque S, Zanzonico P, Carrasquillo JA, Lyashchenko SK, Thakur SB, Donzelli M, Turner RS, Lewis JS, Cheung NKV, Larson SM, Dunkel IJ (2018) Convection-enhanced delivery for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-centre, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(8):1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30322-X
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30322-X
pubmed: 29914796
pmcid: 6692905
Bailey K, Pandit-Taskar N, Humm JL, Zanzonico P, Gilheeney S, Cheung KV, Kramer K (2019) Targeted radioimmunotherapy for embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes. J Neurooncol 143(1):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03139-6
doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03139-6
pubmed: 30879172
pmcid: 7416633
Patterson JD, Henson JC, Breese RO, Bielamowicz KJ, Rodriguez A (2020) CAR T cell therapy for pediatric brain tumors. Front Oncol 10:1682
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01582