Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Cancers of the Uterus Treated With Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: The SPARTACUS Phase 1/2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2022
01 06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
15
4
2022
medline:
22
6
2022
entrez:
14
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adjuvant radiation plays an important role in reducing locoregional recurrence in patients with uterine cancer. Although hypofractionated radiotherapy may benefit health care systems and the global community while decreasing treatment burden for patients traveling for daily radiotherapy, it has not been studied prospectively nor in randomized trials for treatment of uterine cancers, and the associated toxic effects and patient quality of life are unknown. To evaluate acute genitourinary and bowel toxic effects and patient-reported outcomes following stereotactic hypofractionated adjuvant radiation to the pelvis for treatment of uterine cancer. The Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (SPARTACUS) phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial of patients accrued between May 2019 and August 2021 was conducted as a multicenter trial at 2 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. In total, 61 patients with uterine cancer stages I through III after surgery entered the study. Stereotactic adjuvant pelvic radiation to a dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions administered every other day or once weekly. Assessments of toxic effects and patient-reported quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and endometrial EN24) were collected at baseline, fractions 3 and 5, and at 6 weeks and 3 months of follow-up. Descriptive analysis was conducted, calculating means, SDs, medians, IQRs, and ranges for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate generalized linear mixed models were generated for repeated measurements on the quality-of-life scales. A total of 61 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; range, 51-88 years). Tumor histologic results included 39 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 15 serous or clear cell, 3 carcinosarcoma, and 4 dedifferentiated. Sixteen patients received sequential chemotherapy, and 9 received additional vault brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 3-15 months). Of 61 patients, worst acute gastrointestinal tract toxic effects of grade 1 were observed in 33 patients (54%) and of grade 2 in 8 patients (13%). For genitourinary worst toxic effects, grade 1 was observed in 25 patients (41%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (3%). One patient (1.6%) had an acute grade 3 gastrointestinal tract toxic effect of diarrhea at fraction 5 that resolved at follow-up. Only patient-reported diarrhea scores were both clinically (scores ≥10) and statistically significantly worse at fraction 5 (mean [SD] score, 35.76 [26.34]) compared with baseline (mean [SD] score, 6.56 [13.36]; P < .001), but this symptom improved at follow-up. Results of this phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that stereotactic hypofractionated radiation was well tolerated at short-term follow-up for treatment of uterine cancer. Longer follow-up and future randomized studies are needed to further evaluate this treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04866394.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35420695
pii: 2791270
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0362
pmc: PMC9011178
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04866394']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-9Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1685-1692
pubmed: 32073955
Radiother Oncol. 2018 May;127(2):213-218
pubmed: 29588072
Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):1613-1626
pubmed: 32580883
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Oct;163:159-164
pubmed: 34487764
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):834-8
pubmed: 15927414
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-1543
pubmed: 31540791
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):83-90
pubmed: 23582248
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1638-48
pubmed: 22176868
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Jun;135:86-90
pubmed: 31015175
Can J Urol. 2012 Apr;19(2):6165-9
pubmed: 22512958
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Jul;33(7):430-439
pubmed: 34023185
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):244-253
pubmed: 32563593
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Aug 1;104(5):1066-1073
pubmed: 31002941
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Mar;92(3):744-51
pubmed: 14984936
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):428-34
pubmed: 18037584
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3827-33
pubmed: 23008301
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Nov 1;109(11):
pubmed: 29059428
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:270-273
pubmed: 32474128
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):336-346
pubmed: 28190762
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Dec 1;102(5):1438-1447
pubmed: 30071295
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2538-2544
pubmed: 29989857
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):606-13
pubmed: 27681755
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2317-2326
pubmed: 31189035
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Oct;151:15-16
pubmed: 32673779