[Assessment of mobility/motor skills in old age : Based on the S1 guideline "Geriatric assessment level 2, living guideline"].
Assessment der Mobilität/Motorik im Alter : Basierend auf der S1-Leitlinie „Geriatrisches Assessment der Stufe 2, Living Guideline“.
Disability evaluation
Functional performance
Lower extremity
Test quality
Upper extremity
Journal
Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie
ISSN: 1435-1269
Titre abrégé: Z Gerontol Geriatr
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9506215
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
03
10
2021
accepted:
27
01
2022
pubmed:
21
4
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
entrez:
20
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In addition to locomotion, mobility also includes any motor performance that serves other purposes and movements that are unplanned. This article presents the instruments mentioned in the S1 guideline "Geriatric assessment level 2, living guideline", as well as additional ones that are less known. The classification is into three categories: instruments that focus on the upper extremities, instruments without performance, which mainly focus on the functions and capabilities of the lower extremities, and those that do this using performance tests. Mobilität beinhaltet neben der Fortbewegung auch jegliche motorischen Leistungen, die anderen Zwecken dienen, und Bewegungen, die ungeplant ablaufen. Dieser Beitrag stellt die in der S1-Leitlinie „Geriatrisches Assessment der Stufe 2, Living Guideline“ genannten Instrumente sowie weitere, noch wenig bekannte vor. Die Einteilung erfolgt in 3 Kategorien: Instrumente für die oberen Extremitäten, Instrumente ohne Performance, die hauptsächlich die Funktionen und Fähigkeiten der unteren Extremitäten fokussieren, und solche, die diese mithilfe von Performance-Tests erheben.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Mobilität beinhaltet neben der Fortbewegung auch jegliche motorischen Leistungen, die anderen Zwecken dienen, und Bewegungen, die ungeplant ablaufen. Dieser Beitrag stellt die in der S1-Leitlinie „Geriatrisches Assessment der Stufe 2, Living Guideline“ genannten Instrumente sowie weitere, noch wenig bekannte vor. Die Einteilung erfolgt in 3 Kategorien: Instrumente für die oberen Extremitäten, Instrumente ohne Performance, die hauptsächlich die Funktionen und Fähigkeiten der unteren Extremitäten fokussieren, und solche, die diese mithilfe von Performance-Tests erheben.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35441870
doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02060-4
pii: 10.1007/s00391-022-02060-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
239-248Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
Références
Davis JC, Bryan S, Best JR et al (2015) Mobility predicts change in older adults’ health-related quality of life: evidence from a Vancouver falls prevention prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13:101
doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0299-0
pubmed: 26168922
pmcid: 4501103
Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH (2010) Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist 50(4):443–450
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq013
pubmed: 20145017
Krupp S (2021) S1-Leitlinie Geriatrisches Assessment der Stufe 2, Living Guideline, Version 15.10.2021, AWMF-Register-Nr. 084-002LG (für die AG Assessment der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geriatrie e. V.)
Stuck A, Siu A, Wieland D et al (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036
doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V
pubmed: 8105269
Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson MA et al (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d6553
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6553
pubmed: 22034146
pmcid: 3203013
Ward KT, Reuben DB (2021) Comprehensive geriatric assessment. UpToDate, S 1–12
Kompetenz-Centrum Geriatrie (2021) Auslegungshinweise der MDK-Gemeinschaft zur Einzelfallprüfung des OPS 8‑550* Version 2021. https://kcgeriatrie.de/Info-Service_Geriatrie/Documents/210113_final_8-550-Auslegungshinweise_2021.pdf . Zugegriffen: 19. Sept. 2021
Rey GD (2020) Methoden der Entwicklungspsychologie: Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung (BoD–Books on Demand)
Hartig J, Frey A, Jude N (2012) Validität. In: Moosbrugger H, Kelava A (Hrsg) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 143–171
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20072-4_7
Pardasaney PK, Latham NK, Jette AM et al (2012) Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of four balance measures for community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 92(3):388–397
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100398
pubmed: 22114200
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol 56a(3):M146–156
doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146
Ferrari U, Drey M (2020) Die aktuelle Sarkopenie-Definition. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 145:1315–1319
doi: 10.1055/a-0986-2818
pubmed: 32906184
McGrath R, Cawthon PM, Cesari M et al (2020) Handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness are associated with lower cognitive function: A panel study. J Am Geriatr Soc 68(9):2051–2058
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16556
pubmed: 32473060
Parker K, Rhee Y, Tomkinson GR et al (2021) Handgrip weakness and asymmetry independently predict the development of new activity limitations: Results from analyses of longitudinal data from the US health and retirement study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 22(4):821–826
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.006
pubmed: 33290729
Krupp S, Kasper J, Balck F et al (2015) „Timed up and go“ für die Finger in Form des 20-Cents-Tests. Psychometrische Gütekriterien eines einfachen Feinmotorik-Performance-Tests. Z Gerontol Geriat 48:121–127
doi: 10.1007/s00391-014-0854-z
Duruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J et al (1996) Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 23(7):1167–1172
pubmed: 8823687
Krupp S (2017) Geriatrisches Assessment. In: Willkomm M (Hrsg) Praktische Geriatrie, 2. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 24–62
Krupp S, Schöne F, Balck F et al (2022) Selbstbeurteilung von Alltagsaktivitäten mittels Duruöz-Hand-Index – Validierung der deutschen Übersetzung. Z Gerontol Geriat 55:99–104
doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02041-7
Krupp S, Kasper J, Hermes A et al (2019) Das „Lübecker Modell Bewegungswelten“ – Ergebnisse der Effektevaluation. Bundesgesundheitsbl 62:274–281
doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-02881-6
Krupp S, Petersen T, Balck F et al (2022) Die Hand positionieren, um zu agieren – Validierung des 8-Punkte-Greifraum-Tests. Z Gerontol Geriat 55:93–98
doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02029-3
Parker MJ, Palmer CR (1993) A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:797–798
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376443
pubmed: 8376443
Fitzgerald M, Blake C, Askin D et al (2018) Mobility one week after a hip fracture—Can it be predicted? Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 29:3–9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2017.11.001
pubmed: 29602677
Kempen GI, Todd CJ, van Haastregt JC et al (2007) Cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory. Disabil Rehabil 29(2):155–162
doi: 10.1080/09638280600747637
pubmed: 17364765
Kempen GI, Yardley L, van Haastregt JC et al (2008) The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing 37(1):45–50
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm157
pubmed: 18032400
Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS et al (2010) The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing 39(2):210–216
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225
pubmed: 20061508
Dias N, Kempen GI, Todd CJ et al (2006) The German version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I). Z Gerontol Geriatr 39(4):297–300
doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0400-8
pubmed: 16900450
Denkinger MD, Igl W, Coll-Planas L et al (2009) Evaluation of the short form of the late-life function and disability instrument in geriatric inpatients—Validity, responsiveness, and sensitivity to change. JAGS 57(2):309–314
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02095.x
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR et al (1984) Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 64(1):35–40
doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35
pubmed: 6691052
Mehrholz J, Pohl M (2004) Klinische Gehtests bei Patienten mit Hemiparese nach Schlaganfall. Z Physiother 56:1628–1638
Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K et al (2007) Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:1314–1319
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764
pubmed: 17908575
Heuß D et al (2019) Diagnostik bei Polyneuropathien, S1-Leitlinie. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (Hrsg) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. AWMF-Registernummer: 030/067
Nicholas Murray N, Salvatore A, Powell D, Reed-Jones R (2014) Reliability and validity evidence of multiple balance assessments in athletes with a concussion. J Athl Train 49(4):540–549
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.32
pubmed: 24933431
pmcid: 4151843
Bohannon RW (2008) Population representative gait speed and its determinants. J Geriatr Phys Ther 31(2):49–52
doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831020-00002
pubmed: 19856549
Fulk GD, He Y, Boyne P, Dunning K (2017) Predicting home and community walking activity poststroke. Stroke 48(2):406–411
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015309
pubmed: 28057807
Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M (2015) Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act 23(2):314–322
doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236
pubmed: 24812254
Mehmet H, Yang AW, Robinson SR (2020) What is the optimal chair stand test protocol for older adults? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 42(20):2828–2835
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1575922
pubmed: 30907166
Rikli RE, Jones CJ (1999) Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act 7:162–181
doi: 10.1123/japa.7.2.162
Reider N, Gaul C (2016) Fall risk screening in the elderly: A comparison of the minimal chair height standing ability test and 5‑repetition sit-to-stand test. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 65:133–139
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.004
pubmed: 27018571
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed-up-and-go test. A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
pubmed: 1991946
Nielsen MS, Simonsen AH, Siersma V et al (2018) The diagnostic and prognostic value of a dual-tasking paradigm in a memory clinic. J Alzheimers Dis 61(3):1189–1199
doi: 10.3233/JAD-161310
pubmed: 29278887
Runge M, Wahl JH (1996) Esslinger Transfer-Skala. In: Runge M (Hrsg) Ambulantes geriatrisches Assessment: Werkzeuge für die ambulante geriatrische Rehabilitation. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, S 23–25
doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-26792-9
Krupp S, Wentzel R, Nachtsheim M et al (2021) Bewegungsförderung für Bewohner in Pflegeheimen. Bewegungsther Gesundheitssport 37:58–71
doi: 10.1055/a-1490-7131
De Morton NA, Jones CT, Keating JL (2008) The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI): an essential health index for an ageing world. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:63
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-63
pubmed: 18713451
pmcid: 2551589
Braun T, Schulz RJ, Reinke J et al (2015) Reliability and validity of the German translation of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) performed by physiotherapists in patients admitted to a sub-acute inpatient geriatric rehabilitation clinic. BMC Geriatr 15:58
doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0035-y
pubmed: 25935559
pmcid: 4424447
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85–M94
doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85
pubmed: 8126356
European Medicines Agencies (2018) Reflection paper on frailty: instruments for baseline characterization of clinical trial older populations EMA/CHMP/778709/2015. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-physical-frailty-instruments-baseline-characterisation-older-populations-clinical_en.pdf . Zugegriffen: 2. Okt. 2021
Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP et al (2002) Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function. Results from the women’s health and aging study. J Clin Epidemiol 55:916–921
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00436-5
pubmed: 12393080
Tinetti M (1986) Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 34:119
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x
pubmed: 3944402
Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: pre-liminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 41:304–311
doi: 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
Scherfer E, Bohls C, Freiberger E et al (2006) Berg-balance-scale—German version—Translation of a standardized instrument for the assessment of balance and risk of falling. Physioscience 2(02):59–66
doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926833
Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Rubio-Aparicio M, Lopez-Pina JA et al (2019) Characteristics that affect score reliability in the Berg Balance Scale: a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 55(5):570–584
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05363-2
pubmed: 30955319
Cook A, Woollacott MH (1995) Motor control: theory and practical applications. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL et al (1997) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 77:812–819
doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.8.812
pubmed: 9256869
Bishop MD, Patterson TS, Romero S, Light KE (2010) Improved fall-related efficacy in older adults related to changes in dynamic gait ability. Phys Ther 90(11):1598–1606
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090284
pubmed: 20705683