18F-FES PET/CT Improves the Detection of Intraorbital Metastases in Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Two Representative Cases and Review of the Literature.
18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES)
estrogen-receptor-positive cancer
orbital metastases
Journal
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
ISSN: 2379-139X
Titre abrégé: Tomography
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101671170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2022
07 04 2022
Historique:
received:
28
02
2022
revised:
17
03
2022
accepted:
30
03
2022
entrez:
21
4
2022
pubmed:
22
4
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Orbital metastases are a rare but life-altering complication in cancer. Most commonly seen in breast cancer, metastases to the optic nerves or extraocular muscles can have a devastating impact on visual acuity and quality of life. Hormone receptor status plays a central role in metastatic breast cancer treatment, with endocrine therapy often representing first-line therapy in hormone-receptor-positive cancers. Staging and treatment response evaluation with positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is limited by high physiologic uptake in the intracranial and intraorbital compartments. Thus, traditional staging scans with 18F-FDG PET/CT may under-detect intraorbital and intracranial metastatic disease and inaccurately evaluate active metastatic disease burden. In comparison, 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) is a novel estrogen-receptor-specific PET radiotracer, which more accurately assesses the intracranial and intraorbital compartments in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) cancers than 18F-FDG, due to lack of physiologic background activity in these regions. We present two cases of breast cancer patients with orbital metastases confirmed on MR imaging who underwent PET/CT imaging with 18F-FES and 18F-FDG. Multimodality imaging with 18F-FES PET/CT offers higher detection sensitivity of orbital metastases, compared with traditional 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, and can improve the assessment of treatment response in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) cancers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35448720
pii: tomography8020086
doi: 10.3390/tomography8020086
pmc: PMC9024434
doi:
Substances chimiques
Estrogens
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Case Reports
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1060-1065Références
J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1906-1912
pubmed: 28912144
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep;17(5):346-54
pubmed: 11642491
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2009 Dec 02;3:91-7
pubmed: 21556252
EJNMMI Res. 2020 May 24;10(1):54
pubmed: 32448947
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;18(5):405-13
pubmed: 17700235
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(4):249-51
pubmed: 25038605
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Apr 25;8(2):119-126
pubmed: 29755845
J Nucl Med. 2021 Mar;62(3):326-331
pubmed: 32680923
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 4;111(5):1933-8
pubmed: 24449868
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2557-2570
pubmed: 33369357
Steroids. 2002 Aug;67(9):765-75
pubmed: 12123788
Insights Imaging. 2014 Oct;5(5):585-602
pubmed: 25154759
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2793-9
pubmed: 16682724
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 15;17(14):4799-805
pubmed: 21750198
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6584
pubmed: 28747642
Mol Imaging Biol. 2014 Jun;16(3):431-40
pubmed: 24170452
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):546-555
pubmed: 30846327
Oncologist. 2020 Oct;25(10):835-844
pubmed: 32374053