Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death Manifesting With Documented Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia.
cardiac arrest
prevention
risk stratification
sudden cardiac death
ventricular fibrillation
Journal
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
ISSN: 2405-5018
Titre abrégé: JACC Clin Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101656995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
08
02
2022
revised:
09
02
2022
accepted:
09
02
2022
entrez:
22
4
2022
pubmed:
23
4
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to develop a novel clinical prediction algorithm for avertable sudden cardiac death. Sudden cardiac death manifests as ventricular fibrillation (VF)/ ventricular tachycardia (VT) potentially treatable with defibrillation, or nonshockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity/asystole) with low likelihood of survival. There are no available clinical risk scores for targeted prediction of VF/VT. Subjects with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest presenting with documented VF or pulseless VT (33% of total cases) were ascertained prospectively from the Portland, Oregon, metro area with population ≈1 million residents (n = 1,374, 2002-2019). Comparisons of lifetime clinical records were conducted with a control group (n = 1,600) with ≈70% coronary disease prevalence. Prediction models were constructed from a training dataset using backwards stepwise logistic regression and applied to an internal validation dataset. Receiver operating characteristic curves (C statistic) were used to evaluate model discrimination. External validation was performed in a separate, geographically distinct population (Ventura County, California, population ≈850,000, 2015-2020). A clinical algorithm (VFRisk) constructed with 13 clinical, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic variables had very good discrimination in the training dataset (C statistic = 0.808; [95% CI: 0.774-0.842]) and was successfully validated in internal (C statistic = 0.776 [95% CI: 0.725-0.827]) and external (C statistic = 0.782 [95% CI: 0.718-0.846]) datasets. The algorithm substantially outperformed the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (C statistic = 0.638) and performed well across the LVEF spectrum. An algorithm for prediction of sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with VF/VT was successfully constructed using widely available clinical and noninvasive markers. These findings have potential to enhance primary prevention, especially in patients with mid-range or preserved LVEF.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to develop a novel clinical prediction algorithm for avertable sudden cardiac death.
BACKGROUND
Sudden cardiac death manifests as ventricular fibrillation (VF)/ ventricular tachycardia (VT) potentially treatable with defibrillation, or nonshockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity/asystole) with low likelihood of survival. There are no available clinical risk scores for targeted prediction of VF/VT.
METHODS
Subjects with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest presenting with documented VF or pulseless VT (33% of total cases) were ascertained prospectively from the Portland, Oregon, metro area with population ≈1 million residents (n = 1,374, 2002-2019). Comparisons of lifetime clinical records were conducted with a control group (n = 1,600) with ≈70% coronary disease prevalence. Prediction models were constructed from a training dataset using backwards stepwise logistic regression and applied to an internal validation dataset. Receiver operating characteristic curves (C statistic) were used to evaluate model discrimination. External validation was performed in a separate, geographically distinct population (Ventura County, California, population ≈850,000, 2015-2020).
RESULTS
A clinical algorithm (VFRisk) constructed with 13 clinical, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic variables had very good discrimination in the training dataset (C statistic = 0.808; [95% CI: 0.774-0.842]) and was successfully validated in internal (C statistic = 0.776 [95% CI: 0.725-0.827]) and external (C statistic = 0.782 [95% CI: 0.718-0.846]) datasets. The algorithm substantially outperformed the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (C statistic = 0.638) and performed well across the LVEF spectrum.
CONCLUSIONS
An algorithm for prediction of sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with VF/VT was successfully constructed using widely available clinical and noninvasive markers. These findings have potential to enhance primary prevention, especially in patients with mid-range or preserved LVEF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35450595
pii: S2405-500X(22)00156-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.02.004
pmc: PMC9034059
mid: NIHMS1782411
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
411-423Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL126938
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL145675
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Chugh has received funding from National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants R01HL126938 and R01HL145675 for this work; and holds the Pauline and Harold Price Chair in Cardiac Electrophysiology at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Références
Heart. 2011 Oct;97(19):1597-601
pubmed: 21775508
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;2(3):221-7
pubmed: 24952687
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1454-9
pubmed: 9809962
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1063-4
pubmed: 26348755
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:26-30
pubmed: 27988060
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 15;104(12):1624-30
pubmed: 19962465
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Dec;4(6):1222-30
pubmed: 6238987
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37
pubmed: 15659722
Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):532-539.e5
pubmed: 29273191
Circulation. 2016 Sep 13;134(11):806-16
pubmed: 27542394
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 1;42(17):1676-1684
pubmed: 33417692
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Aug;8(8):1177-82
pubmed: 21376836
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1150-7
pubmed: 17868806
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21;47(6):1161-6
pubmed: 16545646
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Apr 17;39(8):1323-8
pubmed: 11955850
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;1(5):381-387
pubmed: 29759465
Lancet. 1999 Mar 13;353(9156):888-93
pubmed: 10093982
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;16(11):1175-82
pubmed: 25302657
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1268-75
pubmed: 15364331
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):927-32
pubmed: 26699237
Circulation. 2019 Feb 19;139(8):1012-1021
pubmed: 30779638
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):33-9
pubmed: 20102864
Eur Heart J. 2017 Oct 21;38(40):3017-3025
pubmed: 28662567
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):288-96
pubmed: 18206738
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3008-13
pubmed: 12479765
Circulation. 2013 Dec 3;128(23):2532-41
pubmed: 24297818
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83
pubmed: 11907286
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Aug;4(4):441-7
pubmed: 21593198
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743
pubmed: 33501848