Smartphone standoff: a qualitative study exploring clinician responses when a patient uses a smartphone to record a hospital clinical encounter.

Health policy PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Quality in health care

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 04 2022
Historique:
entrez: 23 4 2022
pubmed: 24 4 2022
medline: 27 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients are initiating recordings of their clinical encounters using a smartphone. While this is an important, universal issue, little is known about the clinician viewpoint. Understanding clinician perspectives and behaviours is key to ensuring the protection of patient and clinician interests. This study aimed to gain a deep understanding of clinician attitudes and behaviours to patient-led recordings of hospital clinical encounters. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 hospital clinicians. Participants were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. This study took place at two hospitals in the metropolitan area of Gold Coast, Australia. Participants included clinicians with varying levels of experience, or clinical managers in the roles of: medical, nursing and midwifery, and allied health staff. The 20 participants interviewed were from a range of health disciplines and clinical areas and most had experienced a patient-led recording. Three themes emerged when exploring participant attitudes. First, that recording was a significant and controversial topic. Second, that experiences often informed clinician attitudes and many clinicians held conflicting views. Finally, a perceived loss of control was a significant stressor. A further three themes emerged relating to clinician behaviours when a patient asks to record. Decision-making involved balancing multiple factors often in pressurised situations. Shared decision-making was shaped by power dynamics and, finally, decision-making was not informed by hospital policy. While patient-led recordings were viewed as beneficial, clinician welfare and patient safety may be at risk when a patient records a clinical encounter. Current safeguards, such as hospital policies, are not used and may not meet the needs of clinicians when decision-making is complicated by power dynamics. More research is needed to better understand how clinicians can be supported in this critical domain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35459670
pii: bmjopen-2021-056214
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056214
pmc: PMC9036419
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e056214

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

J R Soc Med. 2003 May;96(5):219-22
pubmed: 12724430
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jun;95(3):297-304
pubmed: 24630697
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1121-1128
pubmed: 29178602
Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;128(2):275-283
pubmed: 34633655
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 21;8(1):e15593
pubmed: 31961333
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 12;20(9):e11308
pubmed: 30209029
Med J Aust. 2021 Feb;214(3):119-123.e1
pubmed: 33131072
BMJ. 2015 Jan 08;350:g7645
pubmed: 25569249
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jun;17(6):819-820
pubmed: 32105646
PLoS One. 2015 May 01;10(5):e0125824
pubmed: 25933002
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):242-249
pubmed: 27593087
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Aug;100(8):1552-1557
pubmed: 28302340
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 11;5(8):e008566
pubmed: 26264274
BMJ. 2014 Mar 11;348:g2078
pubmed: 24620357
CJEM. 2019 May;21(3):384-390
pubmed: 30124176
Anaesthesia. 2020 Dec;75(12):1683
pubmed: 32588431
Health Expect. 2002 Dec;5(4):279-81
pubmed: 12460216
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):389
pubmed: 34742266
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1273-82
pubmed: 22821445
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72(12):2954-2965
pubmed: 27221824
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Mar 12;3(1):e11111
pubmed: 30860487
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001539
pubmed: 18646075

Auteurs

Laura Ryan (L)

Social Work, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia laura.ryan2@health.qld.gov.au.

Kelly Weir (K)

Allied Health Research, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Jessica Maskell (J)

Social Work, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Robyne Le Brocque (R)

School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, The University of Queensland-Saint Lucia Campus, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH