Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Among Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis and Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.
Alendronate
/ pharmacology
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Bone Density
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ adverse effects
Female
Femur Neck
Fractures, Bone
/ epidemiology
Humans
Osteoporosis
/ drug therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
/ drug therapy
Postmenopause
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
/ complications
ANABOLICS
CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
MENOPAUSE
OSTEOPOROSIS
ROMOSOZUMAB
Journal
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
ISSN: 1523-4681
Titre abrégé: J Bone Miner Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610640
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
23
03
2022
received:
02
06
2021
accepted:
21
04
2022
pubmed:
26
4
2022
medline:
11
8
2022
entrez:
25
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of fracture and associated negative outcomes, including increased mortality. The present post hoc analysis of two randomized, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trials-Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (FRAME) and Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH)-investigated the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate CKD. The analysis included data from 7147 patients from FRAME and 4077 from ARCH. Eighty-one percent of patients from FRAME and 85% from ARCH had mild or moderate reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, and part of this reduction is likely age related. During the 1-year double-blind phases of the trials, patients received romosozumab 210 mg sc or placebo monthly in FRAME and romosozumab 210 mg sc monthly or alendronate 70 mg po weekly in ARCH. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were assessed at baseline and month 12. In both trials, the least-square mean percent change from baseline BMD was significantly greater in the romosozumab groups versus controls across all kidney function categories at month 12. Romosozumab reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fractures at month 12 among patients with eGFR of 30-59, 60-89, and ≥90 mL/min by 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-91; p = 0.017), 70% (40-85; p < 0.001), and 84% (30-96; p = 0.005), respectively, in FRAME versus placebo, and by 51% (5-75; p = 0.04), 19% (-28 to 49; p = 0.39), and 57% (1-81, p = 0.04), respectively, in ARCH versus alendronate. Incidences of adverse events, asymptomatic decreases in serum calcium, and evolution of kidney function during the studies were similar across all baseline kidney function groups. Romosozumab is an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate reduction in kidney function, with a similar safety profile across different levels of kidney function. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35466448
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4563
pmc: PMC9544335
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
romosozumab
3VHF2ZD92J
Alendronate
X1J18R4W8P
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1437-1445Subventions
Organisme : Amgen
Organisme : Astellas Pharma
Organisme : UCB
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Références
Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Dec;76(12):715-23
pubmed: 19952296
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 20;375(16):1532-1543
pubmed: 27641143
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2097-2102
pubmed: 31418585
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3223-32
pubmed: 17005938
Intern Med. 2017 Dec 15;56(24):3271-3276
pubmed: 29021477
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54
pubmed: 16908915
Case Rep Nephrol. 2018 Nov 04;2018:7384763
pubmed: 30519493
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):962-969
pubmed: 29487093
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;20(5):1069-77
pubmed: 19357254
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Apr 13;11:1221-1231
pubmed: 28458516
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1595-1622
pubmed: 30907953
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Oct;68(10):1243-51
pubmed: 23902935
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1417-1427
pubmed: 28892457
Endocr Pract. 2020 May;26(5):564-570
pubmed: 32427525
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 15;11:1653-1659
pubmed: 27895472
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Sep;29(9):2129-2138
pubmed: 29947873
Discov Med. 2011 Oct;12(65):263-73
pubmed: 22031665
Lancet. 2005 Jan 8-14;365(9454):176-86
pubmed: 15639301
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):513-21
pubmed: 19190316
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):59-68
pubmed: 17013567
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Aug;26(8):1829-35
pubmed: 21491487
World J Methodol. 2017 Sep 26;7(3):73-92
pubmed: 29026688
J Nephrol. 2017 Oct;30(5):677-687
pubmed: 28432640
J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Apr;22(4):503-8
pubmed: 17243862
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jul;27(7):1471-9
pubmed: 22461041
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar 1;105(3):
pubmed: 32068863
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Jul;14(7):570-6
pubmed: 12844211
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Apr;6(4):937-50
pubmed: 21454722