Bile leak incidence, risk factors and associated outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a contemporary NSQIP propensity matched analysis.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 27 04 2021
accepted: 06 12 2021
pubmed: 26 4 2022
medline: 19 7 2022
entrez: 25 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite advances in surgical technique, bile leak remains a common complication following hepatectomy. We sought to identify incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes associated with biliary leak. This is an ACS-NSQIP study. Distribution of bile leak stratified by surgical approach and hepatectomy type were identified. Univariate and multivariate factors associated with bile leak and outcomes were evaluated. Robotic hepatectomy was associated with less bile leak (5.4% vs. 11.4%; p < 0.001) compared to open. There were no significant differences in bile leak between robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy (5.4% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.905, respectively). Operative factors risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy included right hepatectomy [OR 4.42 (95% CI 1.74-11.20); p = 0.002], conversion [OR 4.40 (95% CI 1.39-11.72); p = 0.010], pringle maneuver [OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.03-9.88); p = 0.044], and drain placement [OR 28.25 (95% CI 8.34-95.72); p < 0.001]. Bile leak was associated with increased reoperation (8.7% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (26.6% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (2% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), and complications (67.2% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001) for patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy. While MIS confers less risk for bile leak than open hepatectomy, risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy were identified. Bile leaks were associated with multiple additional complications, and the robotic approach had an equal risk for bile leak than laparoscopic in this time period.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite advances in surgical technique, bile leak remains a common complication following hepatectomy. We sought to identify incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes associated with biliary leak.
STUDY DESIGN
This is an ACS-NSQIP study. Distribution of bile leak stratified by surgical approach and hepatectomy type were identified. Univariate and multivariate factors associated with bile leak and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
Robotic hepatectomy was associated with less bile leak (5.4% vs. 11.4%; p < 0.001) compared to open. There were no significant differences in bile leak between robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy (5.4% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.905, respectively). Operative factors risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy included right hepatectomy [OR 4.42 (95% CI 1.74-11.20); p = 0.002], conversion [OR 4.40 (95% CI 1.39-11.72); p = 0.010], pringle maneuver [OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.03-9.88); p = 0.044], and drain placement [OR 28.25 (95% CI 8.34-95.72); p < 0.001]. Bile leak was associated with increased reoperation (8.7% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (26.6% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (2% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), and complications (67.2% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001) for patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy.
CONCLUSION
While MIS confers less risk for bile leak than open hepatectomy, risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy were identified. Bile leaks were associated with multiple additional complications, and the robotic approach had an equal risk for bile leak than laparoscopic in this time period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35467144
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08938-5
pii: 10.1007/s00464-021-08938-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5710-5723

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Giglio MC, Giakoustidis A, Draz A, Jawad ZAR, Pai M, Habib NA, Tait P, Frampton AE, Jiao LR (2016) Oncological outcomes of major liver resection following portal vein embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23:3709–3717. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5264-6
doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5264-6 pubmed: 27272106
Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, Corvera C, Weber S, Blumgart LH (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 236:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3
doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3 pubmed: 12368667 pmcid: 1422593
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Dematteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the international study group of liver surgery. Surgery 149:680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002 pubmed: 21316725
Erdogan D, Busch ORC, Van Delden OM, Rauws EAJ, Gouma DJ, Van Gulik TM (2008) Incidence and management of bile leakage after partial liver resection. Dig Surg 25:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118024
doi: 10.1159/000118024 pubmed: 18292662
Yamashita YI, Hamatsu T, Rikimaru T, Tanaka S, Shirabe K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K (2001) Bile leakage after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 233:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200101000-00008
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00008 pubmed: 11141224 pmcid: 1421165
Capussotti L (2006) Bile leakage and liver resection. Arch Surg 141:690. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.7.690
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.690 pubmed: 16847242
Reed DN, Vitale GC, Wrightson WR, Edwards M, McMasters K (2003) Decreasing mortality of bile leaks after elective hepatic surgery. Am J Surg 185:316–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01419-8
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01419-8 pubmed: 12657381
Spetzler VN, Schepers M, Pinnschmidt HO, Fischer L, Nashan B, Li J (2019) The incidence and severity of post-hepatectomy bile leaks is affected by surgical indications, preoperative chemotherapy, and surgical procedures. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 8:101–110. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2019.02.06
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.02.06 pubmed: 31098357 pmcid: 6503260
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413 pubmed: 26700223
Jin B, Chen M-T, Fei Y-T, Du S-D, Mao Y-L (2018) Safety and efficacy for laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 27:A26–A34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.06.007
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.06.007 pubmed: 28687154
He J, Amini N, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Makary M, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ, Pawlik TM (2015) National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis. HPB 17:919–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12469
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12469 pubmed: 26234323 pmcid: 4571760
Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, Sutcliffe RP (2020) A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.227
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.227 pubmed: 33339639
Tee MC, Chen L, Peightal D, Franko J, Kim PT, Brahmbhatt RD, Raman S, Scudamore CH, Chung SW, Segedi M (2019) Minimally invasive hepatectomy is associated with decreased morbidity and resource utilization in the elderly. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07298-5
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07298-5 pubmed: 31820156
Hilal MA, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D’Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van Der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2018) The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524 pubmed: 29064908
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Hilal MA, Belli G, Kwon CHD, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schön MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184 pubmed: 25742461
Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Fuks D, Ratti F, Kawai T, Berardi G, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Van der Poel M, Faoury M, Besselink MG, D’Hondt M, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Scatton O, Gayet B, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M (2020) Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations—a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 27:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.662
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.662 pubmed: 31419040
Maniar HS, Council ML, Prasad SM, Prasad SM, Chu C, Damiano RJ (2005) Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption. J Surg Res 125:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.11.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.11.010 pubmed: 15836846
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18:790–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2
Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, Sun V, Lee B, Singh G, Fong Y (2018) Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:77–84. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2017.05.05
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.05.05 pubmed: 29744334 pmcid: 5934136
Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y, He J, Boggi U, Troisi RI, Efanov M, Azoulay D, Azoulay D, Panaro F, Pessaux P, Wang XY, Fan J, Zhu JY, Zhang SG, Sun CD, Wu Z, Tao KS, Yang KH, Chen XP (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 25:1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432 pubmed: 30948907 pmcid: 6441912
Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, Marsh W, Reddy SK, Bartlett DL (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250 pubmed: 24045442
Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S, Rees M, Vauthey JN, Hugh TJ, Garden OJ, Fan ST, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Yokoyama Y, Büchler M, Weitz J, Padbury R (2015) Prospective evaluation of the international study group for liver surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB 17:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12322
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12322 pubmed: 25059275
Martin AN, Narayanan S, Turrentine FE, Bauer TW, Abrams RB, Stukenborg GJ, Zaydfudim VM (2018) Clinical factors and postoperative impact of bile leak after liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 22:661–667
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3650-4
Sucandy I, Giovannetti A, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Institutional first 100 case experience and outcomes of robotic hepatectomy for liver tumors. Am Surg 86:200–207
pubmed: 32223798
Saito Y, Yamada S, Imura S, Morine Y, Ikemoto T, Iwahashi S, Shimada M (2018) A learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: an effective training system and standardization of technique. Trans Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2018.07.03
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.07.03

Auteurs

Charles C Vining (CC)

Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

Kristine Kuchta (K)

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.

Amr I Al Abbas (AI)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA.

Phillip J Hsu (PJ)

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Pierce Paterakos (P)

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.

Darryl Schuitevoerder (D)

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Divya Sood (D)

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Kevin K Roggin (KK)

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Mark S Talamonti (MS)

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.

Melissa E Hogg (ME)

Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA. MHogg@Northshore.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH