Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Young Patients with Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Induced B Cell Aplasia.
Antigens, CD19
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ adverse effects
Child
Graft vs Host Disease
Humans
Immunity, Cellular
Immunoglobulin G
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
/ therapy
Prospective Studies
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
Recurrence
SARS-CoV-2
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
T-Lymphocytes
Vaccination
Vaccines, Synthetic
mRNA Vaccines
Anti-CD19 CAR T cell-induced B cell aplasia
CAR T cell therapy
Immune response
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
27
01
2022
revised:
13
04
2022
accepted:
18
04
2022
pubmed:
27
4
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
entrez:
26
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are capable of inducing combined humoral and cellular immunity. Which effect is more relevant for their potent protective effects is unclear, but isolated T cell responses without seroconversion in healthy household members of individuals with Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) suggest that T cell responses effectively protect against clinical infection. Oncologic patients have an outsize risk of unfavorable outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection and therefore were prioritized when vaccines first became available, although the quality of their immune response to vaccination was expected to be suboptimal, as has been confirmed in subsequent studies. Inherently, patients with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-mediated B cell aplasia would be incapable of generating humoral responses, so that assessment of the vaccine-induced cellular immunity is all the more important to gauge whether the vaccine can induce meaningful protection. A salient difference between T cell and humoral responses is the former's relative impassiveness to mutations of the antigen, which is more relevant than ever since the advent of the omicron variant. The objective of this study was to assess the immune cell composition and spike protein-specific T cell responses before and after the first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of juvenile CD19 CAR T cell therapy recipients with enduring B cell aplasia. The prospective study included all patients age >12 years diagnosed with multiply relapsed B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cell (CAR-T19) therapy in our center. The primary endpoint was the detection of cell-mediated and humoral responses to vaccine (flow cytometry and anti-S immunoglobulin G, respectively). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of vaccine-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, exacerbation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and the influence of the vaccine on CAR T cells and lymphocyte subsets. Even though one-half of the patients exhibited subnormal lymphocyte counts and marginal CD4/CD8 ratios, after 2 vaccinations all showed brisk T-cell responsiveness to spike protein, predominantly in the CD4 compartment, which quantitatively was well within the range of healthy controls. No severe vaccine-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, GVHD exacerbation, or relapse was observed in our cohort. We posit that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce meaningful cellular immunity in patients with isolated B cell deficiency due to CAR-T19 therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35472554
pii: S2666-6367(22)01240-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.04.017
pmc: PMC9040419
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD19
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
Vaccines, Synthetic
0
mRNA Vaccines
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
366.e1-366.e7Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Blood Adv. 2021 Aug 24;5(16):3053-3061
pubmed: 34387648
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Nov;53(11):1401-1415
pubmed: 29872128
Blood. 2021 Oct 7;138(14):1278-1281
pubmed: 34339501
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Sep;27(9):788-794
pubmed: 34214738
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33261718
Blood. 2022 Jan 6;139(1):137-142
pubmed: 34657156
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):765-778
pubmed: 33930323
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Sep;16(3):413-25
pubmed: 8535315
Cancer Cell. 2021 Aug 9;39(8):1031-1033
pubmed: 34331856
Scand J Immunol. 2016 Nov;84(5):291-298
pubmed: 27548364
Leukemia. 2020 Nov;34(11):3047-3049
pubmed: 32855439
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2020 Aug 25;9:21
pubmed: 32864192
Am J Transplant. 2021 May;21(5):1825-1837
pubmed: 33098200
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Feb;21(2):83-100
pubmed: 33353987
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1303-1312
pubmed: 35305296
Eur J Haematol. 2008 Jun;80(6):532-9
pubmed: 18284628
Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):259-275
pubmed: 34923107
Pract Lab Med. 2020 Oct 20;22:e00185
pubmed: 33204790
Eur J Immunol. 2022 Jul;52(7):1194-1197
pubmed: 35389515
Haematologica. 2020 Jan 31;105(2):297-316
pubmed: 31753925
Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1819-1829
pubmed: 33964222
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):69-78
pubmed: 34709356
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;130(3):388-93
pubmed: 9063413
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2204-2206
pubmed: 33950155