Diet or medication in primary care patients with IBS: the DOMINO study - a randomised trial supported by the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE Trials Programme) and the Rome Foundation Research Institute.
IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME
PRIMARY CARE
QUALITY OF LIFE
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
09
08
2021
accepted:
13
04
2022
pubmed:
29
4
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
28
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Europe, IBS is commonly treated with musculotropic spasmolytics (eg, otilonium bromide, OB). In tertiary care, a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet provides significant improvement. Yet, dietary treatment remains to be explored in primary care. We evaluated the effect of a smartphone FODMAP-lowering diet application versus OB on symptoms in primary care IBS. IBS patients, recruited by primary care physicians, were randomised to 8 weeks of OB (40 mg three times a day) or diet and followed for 24 weeks. We compared IBS Symptom Severity Score and the proportion of responders (improvement ≥50 points) in all patients and the subgroup fulfilling Rome IV criteria (Rome+). We also evaluated treatment efficacy, quality of life, anxiety, depression, somatic symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ15, PHQ9)) and treatment adherence and analysed predictors of response. 459 primary care IBS patients (41±15 years, 76% female, 70% Rome+) were randomised. The responder rate after 8 weeks was significantly higher with diet compared with OB (71% (155/218) vs 61% (133/217), p=0.03) and more pronounced in Rome+ (77% (118/153) vs 62% (98/158), p=0.004). Patients allocated to diet (199/212) were 94% adherent compared with 73% with OB (148/202) (p<0.001). The significantly higher response rate with diet was already observed after 4 weeks (62% (132/213) vs 51% (110/215), p=0.02) and a high symptom response persisted during follow-up. Predictors of response were female gender (OR=2.08, p=0.04) for diet and PHQ15 (OR=1.10, p=0.02) for OB. In primary care IBS patients, a FODMAP-lowering diet application was superior to a spasmolytic agent in improving IBS symptoms. A FODMAP-lowering diet should be considered the first-line treatment for IBS in primary care. NCT04270487.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In Europe, IBS is commonly treated with musculotropic spasmolytics (eg, otilonium bromide, OB). In tertiary care, a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet provides significant improvement. Yet, dietary treatment remains to be explored in primary care. We evaluated the effect of a smartphone FODMAP-lowering diet application versus OB on symptoms in primary care IBS.
METHODS
IBS patients, recruited by primary care physicians, were randomised to 8 weeks of OB (40 mg three times a day) or diet and followed for 24 weeks. We compared IBS Symptom Severity Score and the proportion of responders (improvement ≥50 points) in all patients and the subgroup fulfilling Rome IV criteria (Rome+). We also evaluated treatment efficacy, quality of life, anxiety, depression, somatic symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ15, PHQ9)) and treatment adherence and analysed predictors of response.
RESULTS
459 primary care IBS patients (41±15 years, 76% female, 70% Rome+) were randomised. The responder rate after 8 weeks was significantly higher with diet compared with OB (71% (155/218) vs 61% (133/217), p=0.03) and more pronounced in Rome+ (77% (118/153) vs 62% (98/158), p=0.004). Patients allocated to diet (199/212) were 94% adherent compared with 73% with OB (148/202) (p<0.001). The significantly higher response rate with diet was already observed after 4 weeks (62% (132/213) vs 51% (110/215), p=0.02) and a high symptom response persisted during follow-up. Predictors of response were female gender (OR=2.08, p=0.04) for diet and PHQ15 (OR=1.10, p=0.02) for OB.
CONCLUSION
In primary care IBS patients, a FODMAP-lowering diet application was superior to a spasmolytic agent in improving IBS symptoms. A FODMAP-lowering diet should be considered the first-line treatment for IBS in primary care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04270487.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35483886
pii: gutjnl-2021-325821
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325821
pmc: PMC9554021
doi:
Substances chimiques
Disaccharides
0
Monosaccharides
0
Oligosaccharides
0
Parasympatholytics
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04270487']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2226-2232Investigateurs
Alain Goorden
(A)
Alegonda Snijkers
(A)
An Leys
(A)
Annemiek Roelofs
(A)
Bart Schoolmeesters
(B)
Bart Vander Putten
(BV)
Benjamin Van den Broek
(BVD)
Birgitta Baade-Joret
(B)
Céline Huberlant
(C)
Christian Peetermans
(C)
David Van Humbeek
(DV)
Dirk Van den Brande
(DVD)
Dirk Wyseyr
(D)
Els Lemmens
(E)
Ethel Brits
(E)
Guido Simons
(G)
Hans Baetens
(H)
Hendrika Van Overmeire
(HV)
Hilde Tack
(H)
Ilse Cupers
(I)
Ive Talboom
(I)
Jeroen Stubbe
(J)
Jonas Docx
(J)
Judith Deseins
(J)
Julie Biot
(J)
Julie Vancaillie
(J)
Kara Vandeloo
(K)
Karlijn Louwies
(K)
Karolien De Ceulaer
(K)
Karolien Lemmens
(K)
Katrien Scheers
(K)
Leen Verleure
(L)
Lies De Sutter
(L)
Lies Plancke
(L)
Liesbet Bruyninckx
(L)
Liesbeth Vanzeir
(L)
Lieve Vandersmisse
(L)
Linde Wyseur
(L)
Lode Vermeersch
(L)
Lodewijk Pas
(L)
Lore De Greef
(L)
Luc Capiau
(L)
Luc Van Braeckel
(LV)
Lut De Groote
(L)
Lydia Jones
(L)
Maria Groot
(M)
Marianne Busschots
(M)
Marie-Hélène Landenne
(MH)
Marieke Monstrey
(M)
Marie-Magdalena Haemels
(MM)
Marleen Snellings
(M)
Maura Sisk
(M)
Nathalie Van de Vyver
(NV)
Nikea Sannen
(N)
Olivia Vandeput
(O)
Olivier Gernay
(O)
Philippe Thoné
(P)
Phouthalack Narongsack
(P)
Pierre Vrins
(P)
Pieterjan Geusens
(P)
Rik Sauwens
(R)
Rudy Van Boxstael
(RV)
Sigrid Musch
(S)
Sigrid Nous
(S)
Sofie Mazereel
(S)
Sophie Maes
(S)
Sophie Van Steenbergen
(SV)
Stéphanie Biot
(S)
Steven Ceulemans
(S)
Stijn Geeraert
(S)
Tine Caeyers
(T)
Vincent Vanbelle
(V)
Willem Raat
(W)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JT has given Scientific advice to Alfa Wassermann, Allergan, Christian Hansen, Danone, Grünenthal, Ironwood, Janssen, Kiowa Kirin, Menarini, Mylan, Neutec, Novartis, Noventure, Nutricia, Shionogi, Shire, Takeda, Theravance, Tramedico, Truvion, Tsumura, Zealand and Zeria Pharmaceuticals, has received research support from Shire, Sofar and Tsumura, and has served on the Speaker Bureau for Abbott, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Menarini, Mylan, Novartis, Shire, Takeda, Truvion and Zeria. Funding was provided by a Methusalem grant from Leuven University to JT. HP has given scientific advice to Allergan, Danone, Menarini, Merck Serono, Shire and Zeria and has served on the speaker Bureau of Menarini, Merck Serono, Shire and Zeria. LVO has given scientific advice to Danone and received research support from Nestlé. TV has given scientific advice to VectivBio, Shire, Dr. Falk Pharma, Takeda and Baxter; has received research support from Danone, MyHealth and VectivBio; and has served on the Speaker Bureau for Abbott, Tramedico, Truvion, Will Pharma, My Health, Kyowa Kirin, Menarini, Biocodex, Remedus, Fresenius Kabi and Dr. Falk Pharma. CM has served on the Speaker Bureau for Coca-Cola and Zespri and received travel/conference grants from Danone, Nestlé Health Sciences, Fresenius Kabi. This study was supported by a research grant from the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE). Questionnaires in this trial were developed, translated and provided by the Rome Foundation Research Institute.
Références
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;1(1):6-8
pubmed: 28404114
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):99-114.e3
pubmed: 32294476
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;31(2):239-255
pubmed: 29336079
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;10(3):311-322
pubmed: 28246548
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1824-1832
pubmed: 27725652
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;40(10):1133-45
pubmed: 25230281
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;113(7):1017-1025
pubmed: 29880963
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jan;146(1):67-75.e5
pubmed: 24076059
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020 Apr;33(2):159-169
pubmed: 31637777
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;11(2):395-402
pubmed: 9146781
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jan;30(1):
pubmed: 28707437
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):307-315
pubmed: 31080615
Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):93-100
pubmed: 25016597
Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1399-1407.e2
pubmed: 26255043
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;34(4):432-42
pubmed: 21679214
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 May 7;19(1):69
pubmed: 31064345
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Oct;5(6):773-788
pubmed: 29026591
BMJ. 2008 Nov 13;337:a2313
pubmed: 19008265
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;40(9):1023-34
pubmed: 25199904
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Dec;14(12):1331-8
pubmed: 12468954